Dyche wouldn’t make my top 10 but this is King Power’s Leicester we’re taking about - we appointed Cooper who is the ersatz/tinpot/heron foods Dyche anyway.
Bournemouth/Fulham/Brighton were all
promoted into weaker PL seasons, the drawbridge has been pulled up now and there’s basically one or two weak links - there wasn’t in 21-23. Us, Wolves, Palace, Everton, Southampton were soft teams in a way there aren’t now (United maybe lol).
He’s had an under-resourced Burnley up twice and had a couple of top ten finishes, admittedly he couldn’t do it now but he’s more likely to keep a team up than ideologues like Martin.
The back end of last season was football terrorism. We played anti-football at Plymouth and Millwall, zero threat, zero impetus - it’s not like we’re behind it.
Parker and Wilder have shown you don’t have to have 65% possession to go up. Burnley are 4th and Sheff Utd 9th whereas Norwich and Swansea are 2nd and 3rd.
Carrick is exactly the sort of touted manager that we’d walk into the trap of appointing; despite his teams being decent they lack the cutting edge an over emphasis on short passing has, with more than good enough players too.
If you detach his name, face and demeanour from his record it’s a completely different proposition.
Dyche has achieved more than Martin, Cooper, Gary O’Neil, Mowbray - the sort of pool our myopic twats are
looking in.
He can also manage upwards far better which is what we need. Substance over style is necessary.