Greg2607

agreed. it's a poor look. (pardon the pun)

I think they needed to use the "honeymoon period" to make some of these drastic changes. Even the conservatives were looking at removing the WFA allowance under Teresa May. There is a decent article from Laura Kuenssberg (I never thought i'd say that!!) on the BBC in-depth section today. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c87g7vdjqzyo It talks about the long term persistent problems that no political parties want to touch as it's too damaging for them with the voters... (The Triple Lock being one example) It's worth a read. our Politics and Style of Government need some systemic changes. It can't continue to be wholly short termist and operating from news cycle to news cycle. We vote for these people to make decisions that are for the better of the long term health of the country. They should start doing that and some of these early moves by Labour, whilst not good for PR, seem to be fitting that bill. There's also a 2nd article on how HS2 costs spiralled out of control. The move to merge the bodies responsible for Infrastructure in the UK over the weekend seems a sensible move. I suspect there will be more harsh feeling policies in October... but it's likely we NEED to do those things to get the country on to an even keel.

What happens if we give him a pro debut in the first team?? LOTS of pressure obviously, but does it mean we could get a higher fee at a tribunal? Or tie him to pro terms??

Sounds like they need a proper recruitment professional on board. 🙋‍♂️

absolute scenes when they roll out Blur and reignite the 90's feud....

could suggest Hermansen is on the way? edit - wrong kaminski then!!

mainstream media will report it as "Starmer says taxes to increase"........ as opposed to "Starmer sticks to pre-election promise of not raising NI, VAT or Income Tax".... then all of the anti labour mob will be slathering all over the place saying "it's always the way with labour".... I think there does need to be a REALLY honest debate with the country about the mess that we are in... what can be protected, what can we achieve and how do we get there. I'm a labour voter.... HOWEVER, I don't think they have got it right in terms of sharing a joined up vision of the future and getting the public behind it. I'm sure people wouldn't mind an increase in tax, if there was a vision of the end goal.

You must be new to all this. THIS is exactly the Leicester that Leicester have normally been. The previous decade has been a huge anomaly.

Subs were lined up before the goal.

Fatawu didn't track the runner.

I suspect it will be doing something to do with the fact we are a mainly service based economy.... i'm probably not smart enough to provide proof of that.... but we just don't really make (or own) anything anymore. Service sector jobs are typically low paid. So Job creation figures look good... but it's not really in "skilled labour". It means that as a business it's relatively easy to keep salaries low.

Well this is my new favourite thread.

I quite like tugenhat. He came across well in the previous leadership race. I think they missed an opportunity when they picked Boris ahead of Rory Stewart all those years ago.

You are making assumptions that everyone's wages are linear here for a start. Over a 12 year period, there will be lots of people who have been made redundant and struggled to find a role at the same salary again. lots of people also now on things like zero hours contracts, so have variable incomes versus a salary and childcare has become so expensive that lots of people do part time work, reducing average income as well. I absolutely do see it across many job families. Businesses paying the same salary for a role that they were 5 or 10 years ago.