oxford blue

I don't follow your argument. Pagers replaced mobiles because communication with these does not emit a digital signal - which enabled location to be tracked. An individual in a specific location could be connected to the pane so could bee attacked. This is completely different to implanting a detonation device to pagers which could be activated through a message. Perhaps you are suggesting all phones should be banned because they can be tracked and subsequently bombed with causalities to all around

Debut for Stoke on Saturday v Oxford - hardly got into the game and no threat to Oxford defence (which had Nelson on bench throughout).

Colin Ackerman shared in a record 5th wicket partnership for Leics - 477 v Sussex in 2022. He now has shared in a record 5th wicket partnership for Durham - 424 v Lancs

There is nothing wrong with dynamic pricing in itself. Anyone who has bought an airline ticket or a space in an airline carpark will have experience of dynamic pricing. The price changes periodically from when it is first offered on sale. There is dynamic pricing with football tickets in banding of games - or if you take advantage of 'Happy Hour' in your local. There is a problem with changing in pricing whilst a customer is trying to buy a ticket and finding the price has changed whilst they have been logged onto website. At the moment a customer enters a company website trying to buy a ticket for an event, that should be the price at checkout. In other words, prices should be clear at outset and should not be changed once a person is trying to buy a ticket. (Just to relate to Oasis tickets - pricing could change for new customers whilst on sale, but not whilst someone is in a queue.

I'm not sure how this comment helps any discussion!

...and get even more points deducted. Not sure I agree!

Chris Wright - worth a read https://www.theguardian.com/sport/article/2024/jul/24/the-spin-cricket-chris-wright-raring-to-return-ban

Guessing what she said: I have to confess, I've...got a new job at CrowdSrtrike; it started on Friday...

I don't agree All the main indices have increased over the past 12 months. The AIM top 50 is actually up 50%; the best performer of all FTSE indices. The AIM all share is up nearly 5%over this period (although down slightly from a high a month ago).

Being pedantic this won't be necessary - he will be 17 on Saturday...

I have not seen such a suggestion so perhaps someone with technical ability than me (probably most of you!) could set up a petition to board not to sell and to KDH not to leave? If he is lining up in a City shirt on 19 August a fans thank you would be appropriate eg perhaps a clap on 22nd minute if squad number still the same?

Contrived circumstances (as recognised in records). Previous record was 38 by Flintoff. This is an amazing achievement (and from a centrally contracted bowler as well ). This record will last for decades; i hope it gets proper recognition in national media.

It has -except when there are English officials (France v Netherlands)

It seems likely we will sign Rodon. Faes has the greatest value of current centre backs and it make sense to sell; I am sure he would command a similar fee to that we would have to pay for Fatwu. (or if considering receiving transfer fees, I would think better not to receive Bologna's money for Kristiansen.) In other words, both Fatwu and Kristiansen both greater assets to City than Faes. I am sure there will be interest across Europe with a current Belgian international player...

This is starting very soon (and is separate from charges regarding PPS). It was reported in the Times (behind a paywall so cannot copy) but there is a very good podcast https://www.thetimes.com/podcasts/the-story. Also a good summary here: https://www.sportspromedia.com/news/premier-league-sponsorship-trans-associated-party-transactions-sanctions/ Essentially, Man City are arguing rules that rules on inflating sponsorship deals (which is against PL rules) is tyranny of majority and illegal). The outcome of this will be huge for football if successful. Aramco (or Saudi Arabia) could put even more money into Man City. Chelsea, Villa and Sheff Utd all owned by Gulf state owners were 4 clubs to vote against this. I am surprised this has not had more publicity to date given effects of outcome - and those on FFS charges v Man C i be heard November .