Foreverfox

So if you agree we may have to pay part if his wages why then would they pay us a fee? Thibk about it. Any loans where a club pays part wages do not get a fee as they may as well use the loan fee if there was one to pay the wages. It eoulf not makes sense for us to get a fee but then pay part wages for tax purposes. Any why do you think we are now looking at loans as opposed to permanent transfers? Because we are struggling to sell the deadwood so anything off the wage books would help. I highly doubt any Italian club had EVER paid a loan fee for a championship player. As for me keep arguing with you as you claim? I made one comment to you as regards Braybrooke not returning to fill training anytime soon. The difference of training and full physical contact training is huge so I'll say it again he is nowhere ready to return to full time training. Just because I don't agree with you does not mean I have an issue with you or are you so superior you take it personally with anyone who remotely is in disagreement with you to the point where you claim I'm picking arguments with you? Sorry I'm not at school I just have a voice , one that you clearly don't like so I'll humbly bow to your superior knowledge.

I disagree. You are so wude of the mark. It's in our interest to reduce the wage bill. Look how much deadwood we are stuck with again Anything we can free up will help towards getting another couple in. There is no indication they will be paying a fee and they definitely will want a wage reduction as well. Theres Hardly 10 clubs queuing up to snap the lad up.

No way would be be getting any sort if loan fee. To get a club to cover 50% of his wages for a year would be as good as we could hope for I guess. You ain't getting a loan fee from an Italian club unless it's for a top class player.

Coached Schmeichel. Or does that not count because we can only lay blame on the forum and not give credit?

Asking 2.5m for Iversen.

Robbie James.

You must have nof bedn watching closely. Richards was in a withdrawn 9 position and Booth out wide. The formation was fluid so I guess you got confused with Booth going inside sometimes.

Richards was number 9. Booth was on the right.

They are nowhere near

Not due to return to training anytime soon.

The hold up us nothing to do with accommodation at Seagrave. What utter crap some people talk. 🙄

Why is everyone presuming that it's Chelsea holding the deal up. Has it not occurred to anyone it could be our side waiting for another outgoing before the powers that be give the go ahead for another incoming? Yes I know the deal is not for huge numbers but maybe just maybe we are acting responsibly with our finances moving forward.

Ndidi is going nowhere. Enzo obviously rates him.

It will be a loan

Injured