AlloverthefloorYesNdidi

He never failed to condemn it. Thats a myth

That does show that Duke interpreted Trump's campaign a certain way. I interpeted it as restoring patriotism and conservative values, not to do with race. Duke obviously felt differently There is no quote there showing anything Trump has said that aligns with white supremacy Interesting in that article David Duke was unhappy with Trump's response which condemned the violence, shows he clearly thought Trump was not defending Duke's cause

https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/commentary/why-trumps-executive-order-health-care-positive-step Same website with an article on his initiatives.

I've been having a read of what Trump has done regarding healthcare. Here is an article stating he has added options and flexibility to the system which has benefits in that people dont have to také just what the govt. offers, which can result in rising costs for people According to this its not as straightforward as Trump destroying Medicaid and taking healthcare away from people. Curious to know if this softens your opinion of him on this issue.... https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/commentary/why-the-left-desperate-sabotage-trumps-health-care-plans

I'm not being facetious. I didnt follow this one closely at the time. Has Trump projected a white supremacist thing? Got any quotes for that? Because Richard Spencer came on and said Trump is not for the white nationalist cause. So not all white supremacists like him obviously. Although no doubt some do. Did Trump really campaign with that lot in mind? Seems to me its something the media sticks on him more than anything I'm not flat denying your claim, just asking if there is any tangible evidence in things Trump has said that states alliance with white supremacist views. I guess one could say his 'bad hombres' kind of thing could be picked up by them. But its not explicit in that sense, its just saying all these refugees are not innocent angels and security is needed

What did Trump say that encouraged that guy? Genuine question because I dont know, it could have been in the news but I missed it because I wasnt paying too much attention in general at the time

Haha, i get you leicsmac The subject within that could be endless couldnt it? So many factors. Some people are appalled Trump pulled out of these deals. But some people have said that the Paris was bad for the US with no real return ecologically And some have said that the ACA actually made things worse, so to pull out of that and not replace it is fine, if you hold that perspective Trump did something nice about kidneys recently apparently, also getting his organs mixed up amusingly enough. A slight improvement to healthcare in america in that field. I'll give him a brownie point for that

Ducked out of this one? @Carl the Llama

Well, maybe, but Clinton had a much more involved relationship with Epstein, so surely Hilary would be a worse offender in that regard and Trump is perhaps less associated than she? So by that criteria you must be pleased she didnt win

Even as someone who likes Trump I would agree with this If politicians and the media spent more time honestly assessing policies and their effects it would serve the people a lot better I'm not even sure if its been mentioned on here that whilst all this has been going on Trump has made a move to cancel asylum from Central American countries. This isnt getting a lot of media time because they are talking about his tweets, its incredible

I would argue revoking a bad policy is better than leaving it there. Ive heard accounts that ACA made things worse, added on costs through extra bureaucracy Just because these Acts sound nice doesnt mean they are good. Shouldnt keep something just because its politically correct. A strong politician doesnt give in to things just because they sound nice

I had a brain fart there and was half thinking about something else I was reading, my mind inserted a completely irrelavant word, edited it as soon as I re-read it So forget that. Do you think she was right to use the term Never Again? Do you concede she was invoking the holocaust regarding these camps that people are flocking to? As far as I remember Jews werent running to the camps in droves from far and wide. Pretty sure they were forced there agains their will

Have you got these on a permanent clipboard leicsmac? I think you can strike off the Paris Agreement one at least. And the Affordable Care Act, which was a disaster

What does discontinuing the camps mean? No borders? And I like how you have completely avoided acknowledging how shitty it was of her to use the phrase Never Again, which is synonymous with the holocaust. That alone could be said to incite the man with the gun who firebombed the place Thats why she couldnt condemn the attack probably, because she would then have to answer questions as to her inflammatory rhetoric I doubt AOC is aware tbf, think she is just a giant idiot

AOC claimed it though. She used the term 'Never again'. I assume you are aware of this term?