Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Muzzy_Larsson

Member
  • Posts

    3,578
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Muzzy_Larsson

  1. Your half right. Rodgers bid £19m for McGregor the same summer after Tielemens arrived however it was towards the end of the window after we'd already sold Tierney and it was rejected. Rodgers then went and got Praet instead.
  2. That ship has surely sailed with him signing a new contract no?
  3. If physicality is what he's after in midfield then I can't see him making a move for McGregor, especially if Soumare signs as McGregor is similar in that one of his main strengths is he's a ball carrier.
  4. He doesn't, the context we were discussing was if Tielemans were to be sold.
  5. I'd say now, after two good seasons of finishing in the top 6, winning a trophy then Leicester would now be a tangible step up from a club like Wolves.
  6. Agreed on Traore. Football is always down to opinions but I have been impressed with Neves quit often, he blows hot and cold a bit so take your point but I think he's still at a good age for someone like Rodgers to develop consistency in him.
  7. If Tielemans were not to sign a new contract this summer cashing in on him to the tune of £70-80m and replacing him with Neves for £35m would be very decent business imo.
  8. Harsh on Albrighton, still a very useful player even now.
  9. He isn't half the player Barnes is.
  10. No no and thrice no. A runner and not much else who is still living off one decent season of football. Looks scared and is horrific technically.
  11. Reading your posts your feelings don't appear to be mixed at all. Just in that post above your banging on about all his shortcomings and basically discrediting his part in the FA cup win. Who is this champion coach you speak of that would have A: came to the club in the first place and B: exceeded Rodgers achievements with a net spend of £9m? He's not without his faults but some people need to get an absolute grip on here with regards him. I'd hate to have been on here when Puel was around given the mental level of entitledness at times. FWIW Under is not a champions league level player, despite the odd fleeting appearance at that level years ago. He's been papped out on loan because he's not part of the plans of a club who just scraped into the UEFA conference league. We're talking about a guy here who has never been able to be a regular starter anywhere he's been. Roma will be trying their damnest to get rid of him again next season which tells it's own story.
  12. Incredible achievement to do what they done and great for the Scottish game.
  13. If no big exits then four. Soumare Edouard Left footed right sided attacker Left Back
  14. I thought he looked poor also tbh, lacked composure big time and was thrashing at things.
  15. He had a horrible season for us the season before this one but in all honesty he has been the one shining light for us this season, he's done well and he looks at times like the only one that really cared. Only a year to go on his deal also so another one that any prospective clubs could get on the cheap. AC Milan have been constantly linked with him for the past couple of years.
  16. I'm not saying he's flawless, he makes mistakes and the wrong calls from time to time, what manager doesn't, but to deliver what he has over the last two seasons on a net spend of £9m is absolutely terrific. There's no other manager that would have come two and a bit years ago that would have come close to delivering what he has with those sort of resources.
  17. Gutting way to miss out on top 4 but it's important to take a step back and look at it as a whole. First ever FA Cup win and proving last season's top 5 finish wasn't a flash in the pan. Arguably the second best season in the history of the club. 8/10
  18. I was, hence "I agree". My only point was in the isolation of today's game, as much as it was the wrong call I didn't think not making that call would have had a material impact on the outcome such was the nature of it being a complete arse collapse.
  19. Did you bother to read my post? The first thing I said was "I agree".
  20. I agree but I don't think it had a material impact on the game, it worked fine until the last twenty minutes. It was a collective arse collapse (manager and players), tactical manouveres wouldn't have made much difference to that.
×
×
  • Create New...