And this is the issue. UFS take comments that do not agree with their statement (and it is more a statement than gathering idea, questions and concerns because of how it is written) as a negative towards them. If you are a group trying to represent fans you have to be able to write it impartially. Instead it is loaded with the negatives - and of course there are negatives to the system the club are using at present - but unless posters agree with the 'statement', then they are seen as being against UFS. If you are asking for feedback,, please take all the feedback and not be selective if the feedback doesn't fit in with all of the same views of the original post. You are asking for the fans opinions and experiences. If the club had done their survey on the singing section with a strong negative slant towards the singing section then there would have been a massive outcry, and rightfully so. If UFS want to represent fans, and get a lot more fans backing them, they need to try and stop their members slating different views and be prepared to listen to constructive criticism. The lads and lasses are trying their best, and should be congratulated on all the great things they have been able to achieve, but if they want to push agendas that can and do affect us all (good or bad), then there should be a lot more work on 'public relations'.