Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

ramboacdc

Member
  • Posts

    6,917
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

ramboacdc last won the day on 10 July

ramboacdc had the most liked content!

About ramboacdc

  • Birthday 18/08/1989

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Coalville
  • Fan Since
    1989

Recent Profile Visitors

10,254 profile views

ramboacdc's Achievements

Experienced Pro

Experienced Pro (13/14)

  • Dedicated
  • Very Popular
  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine

Recent Badges

1,145

Reputation

  1. Can you actually have a 6 pointer this early in the season?
  2. It's not just them "sleuths" who were jumping on the Jay thing or the woman who went missing in the river a few years ago. They will jump on anything they can go keep the videos and clicks coming, that's just how this shitty social media world works and there is enough people who will make it and morons who will watch it and follow them. If I hear the words "true crime documentary" or "True Crime Podcast" one more time I may put my head through a microwave. This case has has David Davis, medical professionals and some statiticians saying that there is holes and inconsitencies. They could still take it higher than our Court of Appeal if they find something. It isn't over until it goes all the way up to the Supreme Court then into the European courts. I think she was involved for sure, but the doubts over if she got given a fair defence will be something that could end up at retrials for sure. I don't think it's a conspiracy. It's not like it's being done to cover someone or something else and she is the scapegoat or whatever. This inquiry will show what we all know, the NHS can't keep up with itself at this point and there is too many people involved in higher up roles that stuff gets lost. If a doctor or nurse raises a concern to their superior, there is a good chance it won't even make it to a consultant's desk or someone above them who has no medical experience and it's just white noise to them. EDIT: I just read the rest of the thread. I'll grab my tin foil hat and my flack jacket and sit in the corner....
  3. There's more at Wembley for sure. Taylor Swift has the record at 8 gigs at wembley on the same tour, they will aim to beat that for certain
  4. Mine was set up on Desktop. I have always got emails or notifiations before. I will keep an eye on it and see if I start getting any over the next few months.
  5. Someone just pointed out to me we moved our FY end date in April 2023 to June 30th 2023, probably knowing this was coming and could help. We don't know when the FY end was set for the 23/24 yet do we? We only have the 22/23 accounts I believe?
  6. Charges are unrelated but judgements like this blow holes in things apart from just what you are facing. Their legal teams will be reading through this and finding anything they can use, even if it just kicks the can down the road a few more years.
  7. If we broke it last year in The Championship, I think the point deductions are only added once you drop back into the EFL.
  8. Short answer is "almost certainly not." I think the Premier League would have also said in their statement of which course of action they would pursue now if there was one.
  9. For those who don't want to read a 22 page doc, here is GPT summarisation. I bet that FY rule gets changed soon: Summary: Leicester City Football Club (LCFC) successfully appealed against a decision by a Premier League Disciplinary Commission that found the club breached the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSRs) for the 2022/2023 season. The Appeal Board, consisting of three senior legal figures, overturned the Commission's decision on the basis that LCFC was not bound by the relevant Premier League rules after its relegation to the English Football League (EFL) on 13 June 2023. Key Points: Background of the Case: The Premier League accused LCFC of breaching the PSRs due to losses exceeding the upper loss threshold of £105 million for the 2022/2023 season. LCFC contested the jurisdiction of the Commission to rule on the matter after the club's relegation from the Premier League. Jurisdictional Challenge: LCFC argued that it was no longer bound by the Premier League rules after its relegation on 13 June 2023. The Appeal Board agreed with LCFC, emphasizing that liability under the PSRs could only be assessed after the completion of the club's financial year, which ended on 30 June 2023—after the club had left the Premier League. Commission’s Original Decision: The Disciplinary Commission had ruled that LCFC remained bound by the Premier League rules for the 2022/2023 season, even after relegation, to ensure fairness and prevent clubs from avoiding penalties by being relegated. Appeal Board’s Decision: The Appeal Board found that the Premier League’s rules did not apply to LCFC after its relegation. The PSR Calculation for FY23 could only be performed after the end of the club’s financial year (30 June 2023), by which time LCFC was no longer a Premier League member. The Board concluded that LCFC did not breach Rule E.49 of the PSRs as it was not a "Club" under the Premier League rules at the time the breach could have occurred. Importance of the Accounting Reference Date: The Appeal Board noted that LCFC’s decision to change its accounting reference date to 30 June 2023 was critical. This decision, albeit coincidental, meant the club's PSR Calculation fell after its relegation, thus placing it outside the Premier League’s jurisdiction. Final Outcome: The Appeal Board reversed the Disciplinary Commission's finding of jurisdiction, concluding that LCFC was not in breach of the PSRs as the rules did not apply to them post-relegation.
  10. Someone at Man City is reading this judgement and fobbing themselves silly. Their team will love this ruling.
  11. So now I am learning that my Twickets alert for Oasis isn't working then from the comments here. Off I go to fix that!
  12. I am the same. I refuse to pay gym prices but I hate autumn and winter with a passion. Forcing myself to have no excuse and went out in the piss down rain this morning. May as well start now or I will find it way too easy to find an excuse when it's pitch black and 4 degrees.
  13. Tried for 11 hours, closest I got was I got to watch the standing tickets vanish infront of my eyes and them "in demand" tickets appear. Had 4 of them in my basket. I refuse to pay what I could get an all inclusive week away for a day out. No band is worth £300+ for a 1 day gig. Glastonbury is £355 for 5 days of music, Liam and Noel want that for 1 day in a park? You can bollocks. Nothing will change, they still sold out and idiots paid the surge pricing, justifying that they can charge it and people would pay it.
  14. Will always remember that time he grew an extra head in that clash of heads against Derby. Great guy and great player. RIP Sol!
×
×
  • Create New...