Webbo Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 because he is a stupid cvnt thats what weve all been saying mate Explain to it to me. The ref didn't see anything and just blew his whistle on the off chance that something happened? Think about it ffs. It was a harsh decision but these things happen. Show a bit of dignity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasmic123 Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 hope we give rose some shit in the replay, cheating pleb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
promised land Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 Well done to our away support. You boys were load and clear. In fact you showed them up. They only sang one song all game. 2500 there despite TV and weds night. Coaches left quickly too even after walking to the Thames barrier to get on them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 All in favour of webbo being banned from this thread say "aye". You're a cheeky git . You've had that many pointless arguments on here it's unbelievable. I'm not offended if people want to disagree with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 All in favour of webbo being banned from this thread say "aye". Aye. If other people get banned for the most petty of things lets have some consistancy, and i'm all for everyone bein entitled to an opinion usually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxylady64 Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 Aye.......clearly has a thing for Madley.....odd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry_LCFC Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 There is no way the ref could have seen Dyer's hand hit the ball unless he has some of those xray glasses out of Bond. What he probably did see was the ball suddenly change direction followed by their protests. Very, very harsh penalty imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babylon Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 Explain to it to me. The ref didn't see anything and just blew his whistle on the off chance that something happened? Think about it ffs. It was a harsh decision but these things happen. Show a bit of dignity. Because he saw the second handball of Rose and reacted to their protests. Because he just reacted to their protests. Because he was just mistaken. Because it was clearly a dive and worthy of a yellow card. Oh sorry that was last season in the same fecking game, where he saw something that didn't pissing happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weller54 Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 Replay. 19th January Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 Look at it - the ball is directly in front of rose, the ref directly behind. It isn't humanly possible to see it from his position. He's just taken a random guess because of Roses ridiculous protests. Much as Dyers been done by an absolutely abysmal decision, it really just capped off his performance, completely ineffective and I don't understand why Gray was hooked instead of him, or why Mahrez didn't come on in addition to Albrighton. I'll agree with that bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babylon Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 You're a cheeky git . You've had that many pointless arguments on here it's unbelievable. I'm not offended if people want to disagree with me. Hee hee... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighPeakFox Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 They only sang one song all game. 2500 there despite TV and weds night. Coaches left quickly too even after walking to the Thames barrier to get on them. Jeez, is it Wednesday already? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Oxlong Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 Something need to be done about the standard of referees, no other profession puts up with such poor standards from those at the top of their profession....... Is a (visually impaired) FT mod at the top of their profession? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxes_rule1978 Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 It is humanly impossible for the ref to have seen the ball contact Dyer's hand, that alone means he can't give a penalty let alone the fact that the handball wasn't even intentional. It was ball to hand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxinsox Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 Disappointed by the dodgy handball. I think Kante knew he was only on for 45, and instructed to stay fit. By half time it was clear that Inler and King could cope. Dyer was awful. The last sub should have been Simpson on for Dyer at about 75 min, and push De Laet forward. I do not want to see Dyer play for us again after Bournemouth and this match. The penalty was dubious, but Rose was well covered so didn't need that sort of tackle. Wasyl MOTM for me. A true Legend (and I was on at 20/1 too). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callabinho Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 Impressed with Gray, he's going to develop into one hell of a player! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxylady64 Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 Is a (visually impaired) FT mod at the top of their profession?. .....from what ive read on here no way! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thracian Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 For me this all raises the question of playbacks once more. Recognising how shamefully corrupt FIFA has been shown to be and how many players have been involved in various scandals over the years I've long failed to understand why football is so damned reluctant to allow video playbacks as a means of deciding uncertain situations. And yet they are. Why? Rugby and tennis use playbacks and it seems to work wonderfully. I'm not saying it guarantees the fair outcome but it helps enormously. So why not in football. Today's issue could have been sorted in seconds and we'd have doubtless been through to the next round as we'd deserved assuming Spurs didn't fashion something else in those closing minutes which didn't seem likely and which was very unlikely from the situation in which they were given a free goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 Disappointed by the dodgy handball. I think Kante knew he was only on for 45, and instructed to stay fit. By half time it was clear that Inler and King could cope. Dyer was awful. The last sub should have been Simpson on for Dyer at about 75 min, and push De Laet forward. I do not want to see Dyer play for us again after Bournemouth and this match. The penalty was dubious, but Rose was well covered so didn't need that sort of tackle. Wasyl MOTM for me. A true Legend (and I was on at 20/1 too). What tackle? Dyers blocked him out, the ball has bounced up as Rose has tried to drive past and as Dyer turns to follow the run it hits his hand. Dyer couldn't avoid that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Year Of The Fox Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 Shocking decision- the ref couldn't even see it. Impressed with Gray, Chilwell, Inler, Benaloune, Okazaki. Thought Leo looked good with the ball at his feet. Kante, Was, King, RDL were their usual consistent selves. Bit disappointed with Dyer and Kaspers parry for their goal but that's gone now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 . .....from what ive read on here no way! i'm part of the conspiracy against us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamafox Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 Beating them in the league on Wednesday and again in the replay the following week would be the ultimate payback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Boos Up Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 I'd have taken a defeat pretty well away from home; as in the end they had put out a strong team. I bet they are worrying more about Wednesday than we are! Chilwell and Gray! that's gonna be a pretty strong left side in a few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry_LCFC Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 For me this all raises the question of playbacks once more. Recognising how shamefully corrupt FIFA has been shown to be and how many players have been involved in various scandals over the years I've long failed to understand why football is so damned reluctant to allow video playbacks as a means of deciding uncertain situations. And yet they are. Why? Rugby and tennis use playbacks and it seems to work wonderfully. I'm not saying it guarantees the fair outcome but it helps enormously. So why not in football. Today's issue could have been sorted in seconds and we'd have doubtless been through to the next round as we'd deserved assuming Spurs didn't fashion something else in those closing minutes which didn't seem likely and which was very unlikely from the situation in which they were given a free goal. Even if video playback was in place, that "handball" is still open to interpretation. Yes it was involuntary, but it did move the ball away out of his path. Personally I think it was harsh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramadaone Posted 10 January 2016 Share Posted 10 January 2016 A draw was a fair result in the context of possession and chances created over 90 mins Move along nothing to see here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.