ZeGuy Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 2 minutes ago, Koke said: ManC will go up to £70m by midnight and we will probably sell him for that. 68M. Sure of it. Got the info from an ITK who knows an ITK. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davieG Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 £65mill plus a player they want to shift is not a Huge, Massive or Astonishing that some of the media outlets seem to think it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desertfox2 Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 Just now, Ian Nacho said: That hairpiece. Looks a bit like Trumps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themightyfin Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 No way will they touch Nachos contract agreement it would be way to complicated legally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARCHER Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 He can't leave till we reach 100 pages! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScouseFox Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 Just now, davieG said: £65mill plus a player they want to shift is not a Huge, Massive or Astonishing that some of the media outlets seem to think it is. yeah and it’s still about 50 mill less han what he’s worth to us right now, so fu ck them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turtmcfly Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 1 minute ago, Costock_Fox said: I know, the wiggy ****. What Man City don't know is the secret is in the syrup. Benny will be wearing it from tomorrow... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Suzie the Fox Posted 31 January 2018 Popular Post Share Posted 31 January 2018 Sadly i actually want him gone now. Not helping anyone by staying. He has made his situation quite obvious. I am and always will be A LCFC fan not a Mahrez one. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeGuy Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 Just now, ARCHER said: He can't leave till we reach 100 pages! Can't rep anymore, so I quote you and we have one more comment. Two birds with one stone. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds Fox Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 1 minute ago, desertfox2 said: I don't think it would be in his contract though. It will only be in the contract between us and them. His agent would be pretty crap if it was on Nachos contract with us. Surely it's in his interest to be available to anyone. Imagine he went on a mental scoring spree and someone like Barca or Real Madrid wanted him... If anything the last person who would want that term would be the player/ Fair point. I wouldn’t be sure how it worked so you’re probably right. I just thought it might be as it’d give him a guaranteed out should he perform. Probably unnecessary as it’s in the clubs agreement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunbury Fox Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 35 minutes ago, MCFC said: Zinny will play wherever Puel tells him to, and do it well. If you have a goalkeeping injury crisis he'll probably pull on Schmeichel's gloves. Naturally an attacking midfielder but I've seen him play on either wing, as a second striker, at left-back (including inverted left-back and wing-back) and defensive midfield. I'd be absolutely gutted if he left. Good cos we don't want him or your dirty cash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasey Keller Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 3 minutes ago, Ian Nacho said: That hairpiece. No neck ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 5 minutes ago, Molson Canadian said: would they give us him as part of the deal? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oleksandr_Zinchenko_(footballer) Bloody hope so. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 Just now, ZeGuy said: Not in the midfield. We have enough people there. I want to play him as left back. Also no. Fuchs is adequate, Chilwell is the future. That'll do. If they're wanting to send a player, make it a flair attacking midfielder to replace riyad. Not much else we need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Nacho Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crisp packet Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 Sky know the square route of fcuk all!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desertfox2 Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, themightyfin said: No way will they touch Nachos contract agreement it would be way to complicated legally Doubt it's any more difficult than doing a 65-75m pound contract a few hours before midnight. Adding players to the mix complicates things. Edited 31 January 2018 by desertfox2 minor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
breadandcheese Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 (edited) My guess for the Man City player is either Patrick Roberts or Bersant Celina. I can't see them selling Diaz. Edited 31 January 2018 by breadandcheese Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeGuy Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 Just now, The Doctor said: Also no. Fuchs is adequate, Chilwell is the future. That'll do. If they're wanting to send a player, make it a flair attacking midfielder to replace riyad. Not much else we need. You won't get one, that breed is a rare thing. Unless it's some young prospect. Chillwell is the future but Fuchs is done. Delph is more versatile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnderbyFox Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 9 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said: It’s confirmed. Fake news 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themightyfin Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 (edited) The bid is not £65mil+ a player . The total value of the bid is £65mil including the player. Leicester standing by £90mil. Edited 31 January 2018 by themightyfin 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZeGuy Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 1 minute ago, Ian Nacho said: Well that would be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxxed Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 If we sell, I want Iheanacho's release clause binned as part of the deal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surrifox Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 10 minutes ago, lgfualol said: Starting to slowly think it's best he goes. He don't wanna be here. I didn't think I would have to say goodbye until the Summer Man City head a list of clubs I could reluctantly accept getting him if there was some agreement allowing him to go on the cheap to some dog crap outfit like Spurs or Arsenal I'd seriously consider self harm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnglishOxide Posted 31 January 2018 Share Posted 31 January 2018 I hope Vichai holds firm and doesn't feel pressured into accepting a low offer. You have 2.5 years to run on your contract Riyad. Fine him a maximum amount of wages for being a **** and unprofessional. He should have learnt his lesson around these transfer windows after the last few. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts