Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
StriderHiryu

Wilfred Ndidi

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Sampson said:


From fbref:
 

Points per Game with Ndidi playing: 1.32

Points per Game for the club over the whole season: 1.37

 

It simply hasn’t been true for about 18 months now that “we are a better side when Ndidi plays”. And his personal performances have been pretty poor in that period as well.

 

Not that he doesn’t have the quality or ability to come back and be a great and really important player for us again, but I don’t think he’s anywhere near as important to us right now as he was 2 seasons ago.
 

Be interesting to see what happens to him really as I question whether we can really play Ndidi and Dewsbury-Hall in the same side without having to neuter Maddison. Neither Ndidi or KDH has really good enough vision or passing range to be the linkman and other than bringing Maddison back and neutering him into doing more dirty work or wasting him out on the wing, I don’t really know how you fit Ndidi and KDH into the same side.

Wouldn’t it be vs points without him playing as opposed for the total of the season?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Sampson said:


From fbref:
 

Points per Game with Ndidi playing: 1.32

Points per Game for the club over the whole season: 1.37

 

It simply hasn’t been true for about 18 months now that “we are a better side when Ndidi plays”. And his personal performances have been pretty poor in that period as well.

 

Not that he doesn’t have the quality or ability to come back and be a great and really important player for us again, but I don’t think he’s anywhere near as important to us right now as he was 2 seasons ago and I definitely don’t think you can say “we were a better side when Ndidi played” this season.
 

Be interesting to see what happens to him really as I question whether we can really play Ndidi and Dewsbury-Hall in the same side without having to neuter Maddison. Neither Ndidi or KDH has really good enough vision or passing range to be the linkman and other than bringing Maddison back and neutering him into doing more dirty work or wasting him out on the wing, I don’t really know how you fit Ndidi and KDH into the same side.

I don't really like comparisons with vs without comparisons, there's far too many other factors. Form, playing XI, luck, the ref etc. Is 0.05 ppg statistically significant enough, it's 1.9 points a season?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HankMarvin said:

Wouldn’t it be vs points without him playing as opposed for the total of the season?

True but surely it’s going to be more ppg without him playing 

 

however, the stats are skewed by the fact he was generally playing through the period where we had our worst injury list 

 

and he sometimes played CB rather than CDM 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Sampson said:


From fbref:
 

Points per Game with Ndidi playing: 1.32

Points per Game for the club over the whole season: 1.37

 

It simply hasn’t been true for about 18 months now that “we are a better side when Ndidi plays”. And his personal performances have been pretty poor in that period as well.

 

Not that he doesn’t have the quality or ability to come back and be a great and really important player for us again, but I don’t think he’s anywhere near as important to us right now as he was 2 seasons ago and I definitely don’t think you can say “we were a better side when Ndidi played” this season.
 

Be interesting to see what happens to him really as I question whether we can really play Ndidi and Dewsbury-Hall in the same side without having to neuter Maddison. Neither Ndidi or KDH has really good enough vision or passing range to be the linkman and other than bringing Maddison back and neutering him into doing more dirty work or wasting him out on the wing, I don’t really know how you fit Ndidi and KDH into the same side.

Who was he playing with at that time, he can't do it all on his own. 

 

Sorry but I'd take him over Mendy 75% fit.

 

 

Edited by coolhandfox
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, HankMarvin said:

Wouldn’t it be vs points without him playing as opposed for the total of the season?

Well yeah, but I couldn’t be bothered to work it out. Points without him would obviously be more than the points total. 1.4something depending on how many minutes he played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Who was he playing with at that time, he can't do it all on his own. 

 

Sorry but I'd take him over Mendy 75% fit.

 

 

Sure but that hadn’t been the either-or option most of the time and we’ve had to stick Maddison out on the wing when it has. It’s been KDH and Tielemans behind Maddison much more often than Mendy. KDH has been Ndidi’s replacement mostly and I’m not convinced we’ll be able to fit both KDH and Ndidi both in the same side so easily.

Edited by Sampson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, HankMarvin said:

Wouldn’t it be vs points without him playing as opposed for the total of the season?

We took 25 points from the 18 games he started

 

We took 27 points from the 20 games he didn’t start

 

Wilf starting = 1.38 ppg

Wilf not starting = 1.35 ppg

 

2 of the games he started were also him at centre back - both against Liverpool

Edited by moore_94
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

True but surely it’s going to be more ppg without him playing 

 

however, the stats are skewed by the fact he was generally playing through the period where we had our worst injury list 

 

and he sometimes played CB rather than CDM 

Also the 19 games played were against some teams twice and others not at all, so many variables including the run at the end of the season, for the difference to be 2 points over the 19 games given the variables ( form, opposition, squad strength,) I’d say it’s pretty inconclusive to say we are a better team with out him.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, HankMarvin said:

Also the 19 games played were against some teams twice and others not at all, so many variables including the run at the end of the season, for the difference to be 2 points over the 19 games given the variables ( form, opposition, squad strength,) I’d say it’s pretty inconclusive to say we are a better team with out him.

No one has said we are a better team without him. I was arguing against those who said “we are a better team with him”, my point was that we weren’t and that it hadn’t really made a difference whether he’d been in the side or not and I don’t see him as one of the first names on the teamsheet anymore like I absolutely did 2 years ago.

Edited by Sampson
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

“We play better with Wilf”

”statistically we’ve earned fewer point with him in the team this season”

”stats are boolllllooooocks”

 

Obviously it’s a nuanced thing but it’s funny the mental gymnastics people do. I think Wilf is top class and would hate to lose him but it’s mad to bot even consider the stats. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sampson said:

No one has said we are a better team without him. I was arguing against those who said “we are a better team with him”, my point was that we weren’t and that it hadn’t really made a difference whether he’d been in the side or not and I don’t see him as one of the first names on the teamsheet anymore like I absolutely did 2 years ago.

Are u going on this year , because u can’t use this year as a guide, our defence was undermanned due to injuries and I don’t care who u had doing ndidi job , the results would have been the same 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sampson said:

Sure but that hadn’t been the either-or option most of the time and we’ve had to stick Maddison out on the wing when it has. It’s been KDH and Tielemans behind Maddison much more often than Mendy. KDH has been Ndidi’s replacement mostly and I’m not convinced we’ll be able to fit both KDH and Ndidi both in the same side so easily.

Are you sure?

 

In the 12 PL games since Ndidi injury Mendy has played in all of them.

 

In fact Mendy has played in the last PL 14 games (Starting 12 and sub 2)

 

 

Edited by coolhandfox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bourbon Fox said:

Can we factor in those times when he receives the ball in a golden position 20 yards out, and even my long-dead pet rabbit would hit the target?

He shouldn't be receiving the ball 20 yards out from goal. He should be 15-20 yards further back than that looking to either be a safe option to go back too or looking to cover full backs that have gone forward incase there's a counter.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Are you sure?

 

In the 12 PL games since Ndidi injury Mendy has played in all of them.

 

In fact Mendy has played in the last PL 14 games (Starting 12 and sub 2)

 

 

The non cdm approach was in europe when we didn’t have mendy available (psv and Roma)

 

it didn’t work too well - we were exposed but because it was two legged games, the opposition didn’t really go for it. psv did create a lot of opportunities but Jose was much more reserved re their approach. 
 

in the PL, we have used mendy to shield the back four. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dames said:

He shouldn't be receiving the ball 20 yards out from goal. He should be 15-20 yards further back than that looking to either be a safe option to go back too or looking to cover full backs that have gone forward incase there's a counter.

And yet there have been several injuries in row z over the last few years

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Sampson said:

Sure but that hadn’t been the either-or option most of the time and we’ve had to stick Maddison out on the wing when it has. It’s been KDH and Tielemans behind Maddison much more often than Mendy. KDH has been Ndidi’s replacement mostly and I’m not convinced we’ll be able to fit both KDH and Ndidi both in the same side so easily.

are we watching the same games?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Wilfcho said:

are we watching the same games?

I have no idea. When  have you seen us play with Mendy, KDH, Maddison and Tielemans all in the side and Maddison in the centre? And if so, who was on the right wing? KDH? Tielemans?

Edited by Sampson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...