Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Countryfox

Also in the news

Recommended Posts

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-58502589

 

Oh dear, a few people getting twitchy that their executives and managers might not get the rewards this year?

 

How sad. Years of crap, unreliable services, charged through the nose to sit (or stand) in old, cramped carriages and now people have had enough of it. People taken for granted have made a stand (with nobody pushed up against them).

 

But yes, for the train companies it's all about the small businesses and pollution.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, AS78UK said:

Prince Andrew looking guilty as.... trying to avoid getting served.... 

Disgraceful especially if he is so sure it didn't happen. I know harry doesnt have a lot of supporters right now but hey lets protect a possible pedo instead....people need to give their heads a shake. 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/09/2021 at 00:57, Jattdogg said:

Disgraceful especially if he is so sure it didn't happen. I know harry doesnt have a lot of supporters right now but hey lets protect a possible pedo instead....people need to give their heads a shake. 

 

 

 

Possibly a pedo based on accusations of girls who were both over the age of consent at the time of the alleged offence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, urban.spaceman said:

 

Well he won't have that conflict of presenting himself as an anti-establishment voice after spending the last 3 decades working mainly for...(checks notes) Rupert Murdoch and the BBC.

 

The struggles of GB News remind us all that slagging off something you have and demanding an alternative is not the same as actually having to consume that alternative when it turns out to be every bit as shit as you insisted it would be

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, doverfox said:

Possibly a pedo based on accusations of girls who were both over the age of consent at the time of the alleged offence. 

One was 17 and it was in the states, so was under the age of consent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Blue-fox said:

But unless I am mistaken she met him in England? 

As far as I know, one of the meeting was in the UK, not sure it that was the first.

 

I'm not an expert, but I still think having sex with someone in another country where they are below the age of consent means its a crime. You can't have a beer in the US when your 19 because the drinking age is 18 here. Your still under their legal drinking age. So why would you be allowed to go to the US and sleep with a 17 year old? You're breaking their law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Facecloth said:

As far as I know, one of the meeting was in the UK, not sure it that was the first.

 

I'm not an expert, but I still think having sex with someone in another country where they are below the age of consent means its a crime. You can't have a beer in the US when your 19 because the drinking age is 18 here. Your still under their legal drinking age. So why would you be allowed to go to the US and sleep with a 17 year old? You're breaking their law.

But an 18 year old US citizen can legally have a beer in the UK, what is important here where the act took place as much as the age of the individuals. Age of consent in the US by state [620 x 393]: MapPorn

11 hours ago, Facecloth said:

One was 17 and it was in the states, so was under the age of consent.

not all of the states just some of the states some. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no expert in kiddy sex but I would think the US courts are at least a little bit confident in their case if they're willing to summon a member of the royal family.  That said a bloke on the internet must know better than they or I do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Facecloth said:

As far as I know, one of the meeting was in the UK, not sure it that was the first.

 

I'm not an expert, but I still think having sex with someone in another country where they are below the age of consent means its a crime. You can't have a beer in the US when your 19 because the drinking age is 18 here. Your still under their legal drinking age. So why would you be allowed to go to the US and sleep with a 17 year old? You're breaking their law.

No, no, it’s only the law where you live that counts. For example, if you live on a road with a speed limit of 40, that means you’re allowed to drive at 40 anywhere, even if the speed limit says 30.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...