leicsmac Posted 2 October 2022 Share Posted 2 October 2022 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Facecloth said: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/woman-pours-faeces-captain-tom-28131436?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=mirror_main @leicsmac Just wondered your thoughts on this. We've discussed before how I think the actions of some protester distract from the message they are trying to get across, where as you think anything goes if the cause is important enough. In this instance I've seen literally nobody talking about her campaign, or how we go about achieving what she wants, and all they are talking about is how disgusting she is and the disrespect shown to somebody who is fondly remembered by large numbers of the British public. So do you agree with her way of going about things? I really don't. I think I've said it before on the Extinction Rebellion thread and I'll repeat it here: activism is only really useful as long as it aids the work of what needs to be done. This clearly does not, so it isn't useful and is frankly ridiculous and disgusting. Give her pelters. My point all along - and apologies if I haven't been clear on this - is that meaningful action needs to be taken no matter what idiots like this say or do because the laws of thermodynamics don't give a shit (hur hur hur) either way. So while folks like these are detrimental in terms of at best stalling and at worst inhibiting the human response and they should share responsibility for that if bad things happen as a result...we still need to keep the main focus on the work that has to be done. Of course daft stunts like this distract from that (and folks like this really should know that if they didn't have their head up their arses), but the best course of action is to roll eyes, give her whatever prosecution is necessary for criminal damage or whatever, then forget about her and set about lobbying MP's for proper change in energy generation in this country and abroad, as fast as possible. Not use her and those who act like her as an excuse to take insufficient action or none at all. Edited 2 October 2022 by leicsmac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicsmac Posted 3 October 2022 Share Posted 3 October 2022 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-63112509 Lula gets 48%, Bolsanaro 43%. Neither hitting the 50 needed to win outright, so to a runoff at the end of the month it goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicsmac Posted 5 October 2022 Share Posted 5 October 2022 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-63140095 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicsmac Posted 6 October 2022 Share Posted 6 October 2022 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-63153281 Niemann certainly not backing down. This could get ugly for the game unless the allegations of cheating are conclusively proven one way or the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicsmac Posted 10 October 2022 Share Posted 10 October 2022 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-63059585 Antibiotic resistance is something that needs to be looked at much more closely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunge Posted 10 October 2022 Share Posted 10 October 2022 On 06/10/2022 at 14:25, leicsmac said: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-63153281 Niemann certainly not backing down. This could get ugly for the game unless the allegations of cheating are conclusively proven one way or the other. Going back a few days, but what do you reckon to this, Mac? Given the number of possible moves, I’m not sure how one would cheat, unless there was some sort of earpiece. Any Major Ingram type shenanigans would get easily picked up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicsmac Posted 10 October 2022 Share Posted 10 October 2022 4 minutes ago, Dunge said: Going back a few days, but what do you reckon to this, Mac? Given the number of possible moves, I’m not sure how one would cheat, unless there was some sort of earpiece. Any Major Ingram type shenanigans would get easily picked up. Well, chess.com did analysis of his games and concluded that at least online his games match too closely to what a computer would play in certain circumstances (e.g. complex and/or difficult positions) and therefore he *did* cheat online, but there's no evidence that he's been involved in cheating in live games. However, I'm of the opinion that Carlsen wouldn't make this claim without being pretty damn sure of it himself and therefore there is a case to be answered. There's a few different ways I can think of that would allow for silent signals to be sent in an undetectable way indicating a right or wrong move during a game. Like I said, I just hope the ICF get to the bottom of it with quick and thorough investigation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunge Posted 10 October 2022 Share Posted 10 October 2022 17 minutes ago, leicsmac said: Well, chess.com did analysis of his games and concluded that at least online his games match too closely to what a computer would play in certain circumstances (e.g. complex and/or difficult positions) and therefore he *did* cheat online, but there's no evidence that he's been involved in cheating in live games. However, I'm of the opinion that Carlsen wouldn't make this claim without being pretty damn sure of it himself and therefore there is a case to be answered. There's a few different ways I can think of that would allow for silent signals to be sent in an undetectable way indicating a right or wrong move during a game. Like I said, I just hope the ICF get to the bottom of it with quick and thorough investigation. I guess, thinking about it, some sort of vibrating Morse code would work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Facecloth Posted 12 October 2022 Popular Post Share Posted 12 October 2022 BBC News - Alex Jones told to pay $965m damages to Sandy Hook victims' families https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-63237092 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zear0 Posted 12 October 2022 Share Posted 12 October 2022 2 minutes ago, Facecloth said: BBC News - Alex Jones told to pay $965m damages to Sandy Hook victims' families https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-63237092 Good. T***. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facecloth Posted 12 October 2022 Share Posted 12 October 2022 2 minutes ago, Zear0 said: Good. T***. Didn't know the One Show paid that well 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunge Posted 12 October 2022 Share Posted 12 October 2022 17 minutes ago, Facecloth said: BBC News - Alex Jones told to pay $965m damages to Sandy Hook victims' families https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-63237092 Poor man. That could ruin him. I almost feel like not collapsing in a fit of howling laughter. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicsmac Posted 13 October 2022 Share Posted 13 October 2022 3 hours ago, Facecloth said: BBC News - Alex Jones told to pay $965m damages to Sandy Hook victims' families https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-63237092 Splendid. Enjoy the broken and impoverished ignominy that the rest of your life will (hopefully) consist of, Alex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozleicester Posted 13 October 2022 Share Posted 13 October 2022 On 10/10/2022 at 21:20, Dunge said: Going back a few days, but what do you reckon to this, Mac? Given the number of possible moves, I’m not sure how one would cheat, unless there was some sort of earpiece. Any Major Ingram type shenanigans would get easily picked up. Wasnt it supposed to be a vibrating butt plug? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soup Posted 13 October 2022 Share Posted 13 October 2022 So getting a vaccine you didn't need to protect granny was a lie. People died as a result and nobody gives a shit. I'm not daft, I do know that it was a difficult situation and decisions need to be made but to just make stuff up was tragic. But I guess when you put your trust in the most corrupt companies in the most corrupt industry that's what you get. https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/pfizer-did-not-know-whether-covid-vaccine-stopped-transmission-before-rollout-executive-admits/news-story/f307f28f794e173ac017a62784fec414 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Jon the Hat Posted 13 October 2022 Popular Post Share Posted 13 October 2022 16 minutes ago, Soup said: So getting a vaccine you didn't need to protect granny was a lie. People died as a result and nobody gives a shit. I'm not daft, I do know that it was a difficult situation and decisions need to be made but to just make stuff up was tragic. But I guess when you put your trust in the most corrupt companies in the most corrupt industry that's what you get. https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/pfizer-did-not-know-whether-covid-vaccine-stopped-transmission-before-rollout-executive-admits/news-story/f307f28f794e173ac017a62784fec414 This is being rather overstated I think. Did it reduce the chance of getting the virus? Yes. If you don't have the virus can you transmit it? No. Does it also reduce the severity if you do get it? Yes. Are you less likely to transit it? if your symptoms are less severe? Unknown at the time, but theoretically yes, and later proven to be Yes. Yes of course it is tragic that some people reacted badly to the vaccine and some of those died. Many more people would likely have died without the vaccine rollout. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicsmac Posted 13 October 2022 Share Posted 13 October 2022 18 minutes ago, Jon the Hat said: This is being rather overstated I think. Did it reduce the chance of getting the virus? Yes. If you don't have the virus can you transmit it? No. Does it also reduce the severity if you do get it? Yes. Are you less likely to transit it? if your symptoms are less severe? Unknown at the time, but theoretically yes, and later proven to be Yes. Yes of course it is tragic that some people reacted badly to the vaccine and some of those died. Many more people would likely have died without the vaccine rollout. And that is what it comes down to at the end of the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotch Posted 13 October 2022 Share Posted 13 October 2022 10 hours ago, Facecloth said: BBC News - Alex Jones told to pay $965m damages to Sandy Hook victims' families https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-63237092 I don't think he'll pay anywhere near that. He'll win his appeal. Scum like that always seem to survive, Like cockroaches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozleicester Posted 13 October 2022 Share Posted 13 October 2022 (edited) Edit - outdated info Edited 13 October 2022 by ozleicester Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicsmac Posted 13 October 2022 Share Posted 13 October 2022 50 minutes ago, Scotch said: I don't think he'll pay anywhere near that. He'll win his appeal. Scum like that always seem to survive, Like cockroaches. I hope not, and I see no legal reason why he'd win an appeal. Of course, he'll drag out the legal process to avoid paying for as long as possible, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marbles Posted 13 October 2022 Share Posted 13 October 2022 (edited) sad to say, but he will get out of paying. The same way big business who lose lawsuits to individuals find ways to never pay the settlement Edited 13 October 2022 by marbles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicsmac Posted 14 October 2022 Share Posted 14 October 2022 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63251303 Let's see what happens now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marbles Posted 14 October 2022 Share Posted 14 October 2022 2 hours ago, leicsmac said: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-63251303 Let's see what happens now. Hate to ruin your hand ringing and maniacal laugh - but let me give you a preview….. ”on advice of my council…..” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicsmac Posted 14 October 2022 Share Posted 14 October 2022 Just now, marbles said: Hate to ruin your hand ringing and maniacal laugh - but let me give you a preview….. ”on advice of my council…..” Of course. It's what I'd do too. What happened to "only guilty people plead the 5th", I wonder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marbles Posted 14 October 2022 Share Posted 14 October 2022 27 minutes ago, leicsmac said: Of course. It's what I'd do too. What happened to "only guilty people plead the 5th", I wonder? That’s like saying “only guilty people need lawyers” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts