Unabomber Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 Just now, turlo said: He was on the line for FFS and no west ham players nearby so made sod all difference whether the ball hit him or not Yeah exactly. They shouldn’t have even got involved there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanSP Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 1 minute ago, Lcfc82 said: That was going in anyway, he was trying to get out of the way if anything ? 1 minute ago, turlo said: How the hell is that offside. no interference with play what so ever Just now, Unabomber said: Didn’t change the outcome of anything the ball clipping that guy. VAR ruled it out, the on field lino gave the goal, we want to see goals. Wow you guys need to know the rules. Imagine if the 23 is the goalkeeper. He is the last line of defence - goalkeeper or defender, he's the last player. Doesn't matter if it goes in or not. Its offside sadly. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox forever Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 1 minute ago, The Year Of The Fox said: It touched him But West Ham’s 23 was playing him on wasn’t he? Ahead of keeper so offside 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turlo Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 (edited) 3 minutes ago, The Year Of The Fox said: It touched him But West Ham’s 23 was playing him on wasn’t he? Unless Raphina was number 10 by the side of the goal? not sure but that's the only player who was offside. no idea to be honest Edited 16 January 2022 by turlo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unabomber Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 Just now, StanSP said: Wow you guys need to know the rules. Imagine if the 23 is the goalkeeper. He is the last line of defence - goalkeeper or defender, he's the last player. Doesn't matter if it goes in or not. Its offside sadly. I know the rules. I hate VAR and they goal would’ve counted prior to this mess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARM1968 Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 1 minute ago, The Year Of The Fox said: It touched him But West Ham’s 23 was playing him on wasn’t he? Oh no. The perils of offside. Ain’t it still GK and a defender, or 2 defenders. Some shots like that. Anyway. VAR are pony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl the Llama Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 1 minute ago, The Year Of The Fox said: It touched him But West Ham’s 23 was playing him on wasn’t he? There need to be 2 defending players beyond him to play him onside, it's just that usually the goalkeeper being goal-side of the attacker can be taken for granted. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Year Of The Fox Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 1 minute ago, StanSP said: Wow you guys need to know the rules. Imagine if the 23 is the goalkeeper. He is the last line of defence - goalkeeper or defender, he's the last player. Doesn't matter if it goes in or not. Its offside sadly. You’ve completely and utterly lost me 23 is playing the Leeds guy with his hands out in front of him onside. No? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanSP Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 Just now, Unabomber said: I know the rules. I hate VAR and they goal would’ve counted prior to this mess. It's offside. You don't know the rules if you're disputing it It literally doesn't matter if the ball was going in or not. It's touched him so therefore it is offside. As @Vacamion said, it's correct but seems cruel. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosbehFox Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 9 minutes ago, FoxyLeon said: No idea why we never went for Bowen. Left footed right winger, direct, plenty of energy, set pieces. Can't believe we didn't want him. We did. But his attitude in tentative talks and the character checks from ex team mates weren’t glowing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Year Of The Fox Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 Just now, Carl the Llama said: There need to be 2 defending players beyond him to play him onside, it's just that usually the goalkeeper being goal-side of the attacker can be taken for granted. Fckin hell 😂😂 How longs this been a rule? 😂😂😂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unabomber Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 Just now, StanSP said: It's offside. You don't know the rules if you're disputing it It literally doesn't matter if the ball was going in or not. It's touched him so therefore it is offside. As @Vacamion said, it's correct but seems cruel. You’re missing my point about VAR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanSP Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 Just now, The Year Of The Fox said: You’ve completely and utterly lost me 23 is playing the Leeds guy with his hands out in front of him onside. No? No, 23 is the last defender. Because the keeper is so far out, 23 is the last man so to speak. If the keeper was still on his line, then 23 would be playing Rodrigo onside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post StanSP Posted 16 January 2022 Popular Post Share Posted 16 January 2022 Just now, The Year Of The Fox said: Fckin hell 😂😂 How longs this been a rule? 😂😂😂 Always! 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosbehFox Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 1 minute ago, The Year Of The Fox said: Fckin hell 😂😂 How longs this been a rule? 😂😂😂 Since 1915. Spurs were crying about it in the week too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lcfc82 Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 2 minutes ago, StanSP said: Wow you guys need to know the rules. Imagine if the 23 is the goalkeeper. He is the last line of defence - goalkeeper or defender, he's the last player. Doesn't matter if it goes in or not. Its offside sadly. I’m aware he’s in an offside position but the ball hitting him didn’t make any difference to the outcome. Very harsh and probably technically the correct decision. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanSP Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 Just now, Lcfc82 said: I’m aware he’s in an offside position but the ball hitting him didn’t make any difference to the outcome. Very harsh and probably technically the correct decision. That's not the rule though whether there was a difference to the outcome? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl the Llama Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 (edited) 4 minutes ago, The Year Of The Fox said: Fckin hell 😂😂 How longs this been a rule? 😂😂😂 Since 1990... https://www.football-stadiums.co.uk/articles/what-is-the-offside-rule-in-football/ Edit: Nvm I misread, 1990 is when being level became a thing. 1925 is the correct answer to the question. Edited 16 January 2022 by Carl the Llama 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Year Of The Fox Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 Just now, Cardiff_Fox said: Since 1915. Spurs were crying about it in the week too Wow I’ve honestly never known that 😂😂 Used to run the line for my brothers Sunday league as a kid too. Played as a defender at a relatively decent level Sunday league wise myself too Im going to have to go and have a lie down to get my head round that 😂 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vacamion Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 If Leeds win this, it puts massive pressure on those at the bottom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CosbehFox Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 Just now, Carl the Llama said: Since 1990... https://www.football-stadiums.co.uk/articles/what-is-the-offside-rule-in-football/ I must have read some bollocks about it being as old as I said but it’s been the rule since I was watching footy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bats8711 Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 Laughing hard at “harsh” and “cruel”. Haha you guys always bring the lols. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingsX Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 36 minutes ago, kingfox said: Why they sacking the guy who finally turned Demarai Gray into a World Class player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weller54 Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 12 minutes ago, TK95 said: Come on Leeds this would be a great result for us Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lcfc82 Posted 16 January 2022 Share Posted 16 January 2022 1 minute ago, StanSP said: That's not the rule though whether there was a difference to the outcome? Fcuk me I’ve said to the rules is probably the correct decision but as others have said it’s annoying when VAR gets involved in something like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts