Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
FoxesWalk

Sowah (Loan)

Recommended Posts

Straight swap for Noa Lang or they can piss off.

 

To even let him go on loan when we have only 2 wingers on our books + Perez would be scandalous. He doesn't take up a space in our PL squad and I'm not so sure he does on the EL squad either.

 

You'd think this means we're going to buy another winger but I'm not confident.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dunno, maybe we were more optimistic we'd offload Praet and/or Hamza and now we've got to consider alternatives to bring in a bit of money? Particularly given I imagine we were hoping we wouldn't have to lump 15m on Vestergaard?

 

Maybe Rodgers just doesn't rate him and marked him surplus to requirements as soon as he came back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Chocolate Teapot
Just now, UniFox21 said:

What was the point in the long term deal to flog him a year later?

Chelsea make millions out of this strategy every year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, UniFox21 said:

What was the point in the long term deal to flog him a year later?

 

Just now, Chocolate Teapot said:

Chelsea make millions out of this strategy every year. 

 

This. Look at Chelsea's income from transfers the last few years. It's disgusting, half of which you'd be forgiven for forgetting even played for them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Kopfkino
1 minute ago, UniFox21 said:

What was the point in the long term deal to flog him a year later?

Max our returns on him. Batshuayi just signed a new contract at Chelsea despite never having had a hope of getting in the team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

No winger will be signed.

I can't wrap my head around that. 

 

BR has spoken about working to get playerS (emphasis on the plural) in but wouldn't go into what positionS (that plural again). I honestly can't think of a position we need to address more so than on the wings so I'm confused at to what players and what positions he's looking at. Weird, man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...