Guest Chocolate Teapot Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 1 minute ago, moore_94 said: If they wanted verbal talks they'd have done that by then. This lad knows **** all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARM1968 Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 I can help Boehly out here, for free. Oi, numb nuts, world record fee which is actually closer to £100 million or Fuchs right off you ****. Hope this helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Sunbury Fox Posted 10 August 2022 Popular Post Share Posted 10 August 2022 God, I hate Chelsea. There's nothing to talk about here. Table a world record bid up front or cheerio. We're not going to be bullied. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARM1968 Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 They’d like to do a deal under £80 million. I mean, no shit. Aspirations are all good but we’re dealing in reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluearmyfox28 Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 9 hours ago, WigstonWanderer said: Wages, transfer fees and agent’s fees are all included in the new UEFA FFP regs, so money raised by sales or lost in amortised transfer fees when buying would be included in the limits AFAIU. Perhaps I’ve misunderstood your post. The wages aren’t sustainable for the amount of revenue we are currently bringing in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxinNotts Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 1 minute ago, Bluearmyfox28 said: The wages aren’t sustainable for the amount of revenue we are currently bringing in. We keep hearing this, but are they now 'under control' following the release of Kasper, Jakupovic, Daley-Campbel, Lookman ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will1981 Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 25 minutes ago, ARM1968 said: I can help Boehly out here, for free. Oi, numb nuts, world record fee which is actually closer to £100 million or Fuchs right off you ****. Hope this helps. All cash upfront no installments and we want a buyback clause and sell on clause included. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARM1968 Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 Just now, Will1981 said: All cash upfront no installments and we want a buyback clause and sell on clause included. At least. 🤣 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPH Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 (edited) 34 minutes ago, Chocolate Teapot said: If they wanted verbal talks they'd have done that by then. This lad knows **** all. we are rejecting bids instantly so are not entertaining verbal talks.. Edited 10 August 2022 by MPH 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lesta2014 Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 Who if parting with £80 million wouldn’t discuss it verbally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARM1968 Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 12 minutes ago, Lesta2014 said: Who if parting with £80 million wouldn’t discuss it verbally They’ll be parting with more than that if they want him, that IS for sure. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thebluefox85 Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 this is becoming ridiculous stinks of the drinkwater transfer, i really wouldnt accept anything under 100m hes only 21 hes rated as the next best french international CB we should be saying 110m now upfront or go away because the end of this season the price is going to be alot more! i cant understand why we entertain these low ball transfer fees 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lanefox Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 2 minutes ago, Thebluefox85 said: this is becoming ridiculous stinks of the drinkwater transfer, i really wouldnt accept anything under 100m hes only 21 hes rated as the next best french international CB we should be saying 110m now upfront or go away because the end of this season the price is going to be alot more! i cant understand why we entertain these low ball transfer fees We’re not that’s why they’ve been rejected straight away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st albans fox Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 30 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said: We keep hearing this, but are they now 'under control' following the release of Kasper, Jakupovic, Daley-Campbel, Lookman ? No It’s too complex to work out in detail but basically we are overspent £30m for the calendar year 2023. A lot of players will leave next summer so likely we have to save about fifteen mill. The ones you listed are not going to be more than half of that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sacreblueits442 Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 (edited) 13 hours ago, Ian Nacho said: His value is only going to go up ....they want him now, they will keep pushing until they get us to relent!!! If they find someone else, next season there may not be a big club in a situation where they are desperate to fill the role. All this to an extent is playing into our own hands, they need him and we set the price. Edited 10 August 2022 by sacreblueits442 Spelling error. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thebluefox85 Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 1 minute ago, lanefox said: We’re not that’s why they’ve been rejected straight away we are because they have been twice and coming a 3rd time which from reports will be rejected so on the first bid should of been made clear what the situation is hes not for sale unless over a 100m bid comes in bye bye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxinNotts Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 1 minute ago, st albans fox said: No It’s too complex to work out in detail but basically we are overspent £30m for the calendar year 2023. A lot of players will leave next summer so likely we have to save about fifteen mill. The ones you listed are not going to be more than half of that. So (I appreciate it's all crude maths etc) if we were to also get, for example, Vestergaard, Choudhury, Soumare off the wage bill, would we be able to bring in one more body, and pay their wages? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Fresh Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 2 minutes ago, Thebluefox85 said: we are because they have been twice and coming a 3rd time which from reports will be rejected so on the first bid should of been made clear what the situation is hes not for sale unless over a 100m bid comes in bye bye. Doesn't mean we're entertaining them does it? It's Chelsea trying to cause a stir with the player and getting the media in to a frenzy in the hope we'll cave for less than we actually want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sacreblueits442 Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 13 hours ago, 4everfox said: No, a new contract of employment supersedes a previously agreed one by law. That is an absolute fact. .. surely you would have a contract with the player and also a contract with the club that you have just brought him from!!! The contract between clubs will be in force regarding the agreed length of time stipulated. The contract with the player would be a different issue which would not involve his previous club. If it was possible to do away with "sell on clauses" by drafting up a new contract, the next day after the player was acquired, what would be the point of inserting the "sell on clause". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thebluefox85 Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 just dont want this rolling on to transfer deadline day and he goes and we are left with vesty as CB all season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GingerrrFox Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 Said it before and said it again, unless they bid north of £85 million it’s not even going to be discussed. We will only sell this summer for silly money, all this bollocks about negotiation etc we don’t want to sell, Chelsea know the score, pay up or **** off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeds Fox Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 Surely Fofana’s agent has been aware of the Chelsea interest for a while. They’d have known before the contract extension I’d imagine. If he fancied the move, why did he sign it? To get bigger wages at Chelsea? To get a huge signing on bonus? (Usually around 10%). They’ve either played this really well, or really poorly… and I can’t work out which. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARM1968 Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 I think they know it’s £100 million. They just want to keep trying our resolve. You’ve gone to £80 million, what’s another £20 in reality for them. This is negotiation, just being done our way, not theirs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pliskin Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 Thing is he is one player we don’t need to sell, and can’t really afford to sell. So Chelsea can swiftly **** off. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st albans fox Posted 10 August 2022 Share Posted 10 August 2022 9 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said: So (I appreciate it's all crude maths etc) if we were to also get, for example, Vestergaard, Choudhury, Soumare off the wage bill, would we be able to bring in one more body, and pay their wages? It’s not quite this desperate they club can do some fiddling around with numbers Getting vestergaard and hamza out would, I believe, mean we could bring a couple in this summer need to get some of the younger ones out on loan too so we have no one outside the 25 except long term injured players 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts