Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Sampson

Ukraine

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Spiritwalker said:

Apparently the prevailing wind generally blows eastwards from Ukraine to Russia rather than towards Europe so any

radiation would in theory blow back on their own population.

Yes it does. But it does change. No point in going further in this discussion, as if you believe he won’t then it’s the end of my point! I just feel we’ll see chemical weapons in the next week, then as a point to the West for our sanctions, he would be willing to go further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, westernpark said:

By deploying a nuclear weapon until they do.

The assault on Kyiv will commence soon. This is the immediate objective whilst the fall of Odessa will cut off supplies from the Black Sea. Both cities will come at a huge cost to the Russian military. Tactical deployment of mini-nukes blur the line between conventional and non-conventional weapons, and the latter are a slippery slope into all out nuclear escalation. It's more likely that Russia will look to chemical weaponry to end this conflict. This would likely inflict huge loss of life on the civilian population of Ukraine and the scenes that unfold will be horrific. In spite of this, the Kremlin will believe that it is by far the less likely route to escalation.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Line-X said:

The assault on Kyiv will commence soon. This is the immediate objective whilst the fall of Odessa will cut off supplies from the Black Sea. Both cities will come at a huge cost to the Russian military. Tactical deployment of mini-nukes blur the line between conventional and non-conventional weapons, and the latter are a slippery slope into all out nuclear escalation. It's more likely that Russia will look to chemical weaponry to end this conflict. This would likely inflict huge loss of life on the civilian population of Ukraine and the scenes that unfold will be horrific. In spite of this, the Kremlin will believe that it is by far the less likely route to escalation.  

Yes it’s in the playbook of Russian military to move towards chemical weapons. Hence my prediction above that they’ll be seen in the next week or so. I just believe that if Putin struggles further, they will be deployed down the line. Tactical due to its effect on both Ukraine and the West. Putin purporting the nuclear stance from the beginning, he  wasn’t expecting to be backed into a corner like this. I believe potentially he pushes further because of being a rat in a corner, as per his childhood. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have Netflix and want to know more about Ukraine. It's worth watching a documentary called Winter On Fire made in 2015. It's all about the 2013/14 Maidan uprising. Which lead to Russia's last puppet government being overthrown.

 

It's mainly in Ukrainian so it's not something you can have on in the background as you have to read subtitles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I’m sadly not surprised. This is crazy if true. Soldiers being shot for not following orders is medieval shit. Can’t quite believe it’s going on in Europe in 2022.

 

So many young Russians, many basically kids, sent to fight in an unjust war and if they try to stop doing it get sent to their certain deaths as well.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Sampson said:

Although I’m sadly not surprised. This is crazy if true. Soldiers being shot for not following orders is medieval shit. Can’t quite believe it’s going on in Europe in 2022.

 

So many young Russians, many basically kids, sent to fight in an unjust war and if they try to stop doing it get sent to their certain deaths as well.

 

 

Face possible death ahead or inevitable death behind. Used in Stalingrad and no doubt throughout Russian military history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Fox1norfolk said:

There are other ways and means, nasty stuff on door handles eg Salisbury

I doubt he opens his own doors.  I also suspect that he has several years supply of underpants in sealed containers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Guvnor said:

There's three or four Super Yachts now Been seized in France and Italy, no idea how many rooms that would amount to but beats being put up in a Travelodge.

They should paint big red crosses on them, fill them with supplies and send them to Mauripol.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/03/2022 at 11:37, westernpark said:

When this is finished and I think we will see an agreement soon

 

21 hours ago, westernpark said:

 I think Russia will halt things and test the West, see if they can get some things back from economic sanctions.

 

18 hours ago, westernpark said:

I believe it will end sooner than some are suggesting. 
My reasoning for mentioning NATO, is why I think it’ll end soon. It won’t be escalated ..

 

14 hours ago, westernpark said:

 I just feel we’ll see chemical weapons in the next week, then as a point to the West for our sanctions, he would be willing to go further.

 

Make your mind up ...   

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, foxes_rule1978 said:

Putin is a mad man, he needs to be stopped. Got to call his bluff early and NATO need to step up now 

This might just be me, but in my experience madmen tend not to bluff. Inherent lack of self-preservation is what tends to define them as mad in the first place.

Edited by leicsmac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, leicsmac said:

This might just be me, but in my experience madmen tend not to bluff. Inherent lack of self-preservation is what tends to define them as mad in the first place.

You could be right but I feel he isn’t stopping and how long can you let civilians be slaughtered without taking action? for me he has crossed the line and he needs putting in his box 

Edited by foxes_rule1978
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Countryfox said:

 

 

 

 

Make your mind up ...   

 

I have. There’s not a contradiction in what I say. I think it’ll end soon, partly due to use of chemical weapons. Push Zelenskiy into making concessions(unfortunately).Wouldn’t be surprised though if we saw a tactical nuke at some point. But before this ends Putin will want to warn the West. NATO won’t escalate and Putin will feel victorious in a sense. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, foxes_rule1978 said:

You could be right but I feel he isn’t stopping and how long can you let civilians be slaughtered without taking action? for me he has crossed the line and he needs putting in his box 

Depends.

 

How big is the risk of nuclear holocaust as a result of such an attempt to stop the slaughter? Might be a useful thing to ascertain and factor in.

 

Of course what's going on is horrible and wading in with the heavy mob to save the day sounds good as a result, but it's not much good to save the day when the people you're saving, along with you and countless millions of others, then disappear in a sudden 100 million Kelvin flash.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sampson said:

Although I’m sadly not surprised. This is crazy if true. Soldiers being shot for not following orders is medieval shit. Can’t quite believe it’s going on in Europe in 2022.

 

So many young Russians, many basically kids, sent to fight in an unjust war and if they try to stop doing it get sent to their certain deaths as well.

 

 

Not mediaeval it’s straight out of Uncle Joe Stalin’s playbook in WW2 . Having purged the army of its best generals because of his insanity and paranoia he sent commissars and NKVD units to terrorise front line troops with summary executions for even tactical withdrawals . 

The ensuing chaos and collapse in morale caused the unnecessary death of millions 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, leicsmac said:

Depends.

 

How big is the risk of nuclear holocaust as a result of such an attempt to stop the slaughter? Might be a useful thing to ascertain and factor in.

 

Of course what's going on is horrible and wading in with the heavy mob to save the day sounds good as a result, but it's not much good to save the day when the people you're saving, along with you and countless millions of others, then disappear in a sudden 100 million Kelvin flash.

Then he isn’t stopping, for me there is no chance he launches nukes… I said he is a mad man and I’m right but he isn’t totally insane either, he is smart enough to know when beaten. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, foxes_rule1978 said:

Then he isn’t stopping, for me there is no chance he launches nukes… I said he is a mad man and I’m right but he isn’t totally insane either, he is smart enough to know when beaten. 

I hope you're right.

 

But, for the sake of the future of human civilisation in whatever form, it would be nice to be sure about that rather than just hoping/assuming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...