Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Sampson

Ukraine

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Captain... said:

Is there an opposition party as such? One that is actually a viable alternative and more moderate than Putin.


 

the fastest growing political party in Russia is the communist party of which Putin is not a part of. I’m unaware of any political party that’s more moderate than him. Whilst he’s not officially their leader and runs as an independent Putin represents the United Russia in all but name. It’s a political party that would be considered centrist with a slight lean to the right.  There’s some far right nut jobs and some left wing nut jobs within Russian politics.  Those that are clamped down upon are those who are vociferous in their criticism of United Russia “, who polled more than 75% of the votes at the last election.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding - from people who have worked in Russia - is that, among the political class, there are some really entrenched views.

 

To think that this is all down to Putin alone is naive, sadly. 

 

The best result is for Russia to come to its senses, sit down at the table and cooperate with everyone else. This benefits everyone through shared work and knowledge.

 

But the likely result is far less pleasant

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Zear0 said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-63573387

 

Also, Russian's to withdraw from Kherson...

Looks like the patient strangulation strategy paid off and hopefully saves a lot of lives in the process. A full on Mariupol type assault would've been very costly to both sides, the remaining civilians and the destruction of the city itself. The issue now is the Russian forces can shell the shit out of Kherson from the other side of the River after blowing all the main bridges .I suppose they can be picked off with the longer range artillery & HIMARS that Ukrainian forces have to play with

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ginger_Filbert said:

As good as this is, I hope it’s not a trap of some sorts. 

Ukraine with the help of the US , UK and other countries' intelligence will be all over this probability. There's a big chance Kherson is now laiden with mines and traps however, and it may result it a very slow and careful advance into the city. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As someone who lacks any expertise on this conflict, I was nevertheless wondering if there is any scope for a negotiated settlement involving some concession of Ukrainian territory, such as Crimea, and possibly other occupied areas, perhaps along the lines of natural boundaries such as rivers, with the proviso that the remainder of Ukraine immediately joins NATO.

 

As distasteful as it would be for Putin to gain anything through aggression, it may at least prevent a huge amount of future bloodshed, whilst giving Ukrainians back a normal life. This solution would appear to address the main Ukrainian concern regarding a settlement, that Russia would merely use a peaceful period to regroup, rearm and subsequently re-invade.

 

I’d be interested in the views of more seasoned observers. Perhaps I’m being too naive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WigstonWanderer said:

As someone who lacks any expertise on this conflict, I was nevertheless wondering if there is any scope for a negotiated settlement involving some concession of Ukrainian territory, such as Crimea, and possibly other occupied areas, perhaps along the lines of natural boundaries such as rivers, with the proviso that the remainder of Ukraine immediately joins NATO.

 

As distasteful as it would be for Putin to gain anything through aggression, it may at least prevent a huge amount of future bloodshed, whilst giving Ukrainians back a normal life. This solution would appear to address the main Ukrainian concern regarding a settlement, that Russia would merely use a peaceful period to regroup, rearm and subsequently re-invade.

 

I’d be interested in the views of more seasoned observers. Perhaps I’m being too naive.

The only concession that would be palatable would be free and fair elections in the Crimea and Donbas regions overseen by the UN and only available to anyone who was living in those regions prior to 2022 in the case of the Donbas and 2013 for Crimea.

 

If there is a genuine case for self determination and the people of those regions genuinely desire Russian rule then it needs to be proved legitimately and not taken by force.

 

I do think it's too far gone now for these types of negotiations, if anyone should be ceding territory and paying reparations for this war it should be Russia. Whatever valid claim they might have had to these regions are nullified by such blatant and wanton aggression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Captain... said:

The only concession that would be palatable would be free and fair elections in the Crimea and Donbas regions overseen by the UN and only available to anyone who was living in those regions prior to 2022 in the case of the Donbas and 2013 for Crimea.

 

If there is a genuine case for self determination and the people of those regions genuinely desire Russian rule then it needs to be proved legitimately and not taken by force.

 

I do think it's too far gone now for these types of negotiations, if anyone should be ceding territory and paying reparations for this war it should be Russia. Whatever valid claim they might have had to these regions are nullified by such blatant and wanton aggression.

 

27 minutes ago, Daggers said:

7F2C55AA-C1C2-4FFF-BE4D-78175ECAF607.gif

I’d be delighted if Ukraine can kick Russia out of its territory altogether, but is this really very likely?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WigstonWanderer said:

 

I’d be delighted if Ukraine can kick Russia out of its territory altogether, but is this really very likely?

 

1 hour ago, WigstonWanderer said:

 

I’d be delighted if Ukraine can kick Russia out of its territory altogether, but is this really very likely?

They could push them back but I don't know if they would be able to maintain a permanent defence along a very long border.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve watched a few videos from this YouTuber on the Ukrainian war. Very positive commentary from the Ukrainian perspective, and quite plausible. A bit wary about placing too much credibility in a YouTuber called Joe Blogs though. Can’t find any other information on him so don’t know his academic credentials.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2022 at 05:58, Captain... said:

 

They could push them back but I don't know if they would be able to maintain a permanent defence along a very long border.


 

i suspect any border control

be done by drones and artillery 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11417563/Putin-offered-surrender-terms-West-loses-control-Kherson.html
 

I know it’s from the Mail but interesting. 
 

I know the west might lean on Ukraine to accept terms without takin back Crimea but I can’t see th being too accepting of that after all the loss and whilst having such momentum.  

Edited by Ginger_Filbert
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Ginger_Filbert said:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11417563/Putin-offered-surrender-terms-West-loses-control-Kherson.html
 

I know it’s from the Mail but interesting. 
 

I know the west might mean on Ukraine to accept terms without takin back Crimea but I can’t see they being too accepting of that after all the loss and whilst having such momentum.  


 

I would literally dance with Joy if that happened. I’d be highly suspicious if Putin agrees to it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Ginger_Filbert said:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11417563/Putin-offered-surrender-terms-West-loses-control-Kherson.html
 

I know it’s from the Mail but interesting. 
 

I know the west might mean on Ukraine to accept terms without takin back Crimea but I can’t see they being too accepting of that after all the loss and whilst having such momentum.  


 

I would literally dance with Joy if that happened. I’d be highly suspicious if Putin agrees to it though.

 

 

He’s callous enough to fire off a small nuke whilst all the soldiers are dancing in the street with the residents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MPH said:


 

I would literally dance with Joy if that happened. I’d be highly suspicious if Putin agrees to it though.

 

 

He’s callous enough to fire off a small nuke whilst all the soldiers are dancing in the street with the residents.


Reckon the Yanks know that and think this is actuallly probably the way you get rid of Putin. You take them off a war footing, cater to his wider circle and isolate him. They scrutinise his actions and get rid him. Probably still run Russia into the ground and line their pockets but at least leave other countries alone.

 

Think that interpretation explains why Ukraine might go for it, other than the obvious that it brings back peace.

Edited by Bryn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ginger_Filbert said:

If peace was to be agreed I really hope we don’t turn the gas pipes back on overnight and all is forgiven, they should have sanctions until they pay a rebuilding compensation package. 

Absolutely. We should also use this as a learning exercise for our own energy security. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ginger_Filbert said:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11417563/Putin-offered-surrender-terms-West-loses-control-Kherson.html
 

I know it’s from the Mail but interesting. 
 

I know the west might lean on Ukraine to accept terms without takin back Crimea but I can’t see th being too accepting of that after all the loss and whilst having such momentum.  

It's the word "surrender" that bothers me a bit. A word that might poke Putin's ego.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ginger_Filbert said:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11417563/Putin-offered-surrender-terms-West-loses-control-Kherson.html
 

I know it’s from the Mail but interesting. 
 

I know the west might lean on Ukraine to accept terms without takin back Crimea but I can’t see th being too accepting of that after all the loss and whilst having such momentum.  

Sounds like a plan :fc:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...