22/23 Kit

[phoneticerror]

Saw it in person today, if anything it looks worse in real life. Really nasty kit that. Cannot believe I saw some adults spending over £100 on the shirt, shorts and socks. 

[HankMarvin]

Sneak peak of the Training wear 

 

[SemperEadem]

Been shafted this year. As if they signed that off.

[VLC86]

My favourite part of it is that the back is all white other than a thin strip right at the bottom that looks like someone has wiped their arse on it.

[FoxOnWheels]

4 hours ago, StanSP said:

Doesn't look too bad in this light

 

 

They both look quite nice in this

[Ricey]

How it would look without the beige.

 

 

[Jaspa]

I know it makes alot of money, but the sponsor is too big & too high. Maybe I've just been spoiled after all these years of KP but it really puts me off wanting to wear one.

[phoneticerror]

44 minutes ago, Ricey said:

How it would look without the beige.

 

 

I’d buy that. Nicer pattern too.

[SystonFox]

It isn’t all that bad in real life imho.

 

that concept kit above is a BELTAH

[Fox in the North]

1 hour ago, Ricey said:

How it would look without the beige.

 

 

A nod to the FA cup win with a twist. It’s really not that hard. Great mock up mate.

[Ricey]

I've got carried away and 'fixed' the home kit as well...

 

Edited 31 July 2022 by Ricey

[The_77]

2 hours ago, Jaspa said:

I know it makes alot of money, but the sponsor is too big & too high. Maybe I've just been spoiled after all these years of KP but it really puts me off wanting to wear one.

Funny how everyone’s tastes differ, I think raising the sponsor above the belly is one thing they’ve gotten right. 

[Torten]

35 minutes ago, Ricey said:

I've got carried away and 'fixed' the home kit as well...

 

This would have been our best ever kit

[FoyleFox]

3 hours ago, Ricey said:

How it would look without the beige.

 

 

Great kit. Sponsor aside. 

And I like your home kit. 

[Chiltern Fox]

3 hours ago, Jaspa said:

I know it makes alot of money, but the sponsor is too big & too high. Maybe I've just been spoiled after all these years of KP but it really puts me off wanting to wear one.

Plus crap. Aesthetically FBS doesn't work. Very blocky.

[Chiltern Fox]

4 hours ago, Ricey said:

How it would look without the beige.

 

 

Could you do this in green with yellow detailing?

[Jaspa]

1 hour ago, The_77 said:

Funny how everyone’s tastes differ, I think raising the sponsor above the belly is one thing they’ve gotten right. 

 

Fair enough, but this next picture is absurd in my opinion; it doesn't even look centred correctly and is miles away from the belly, barely even getting down to the solar plexus:

 

 

with the longer shirts it looked even more strange last season;

 

 

 

The design choice is solely down to the fact close up shots of the players on TV cams usually focus on the face, so you're certain to get increased screentime the higher you push up the ad. Doesn't help that it's a chunks of plastic which won't flex very well and acts like a block on the fabric.

 

FBS have given LCFC an opportunity to make alot of money, their brand images are now tied together for a while. I just think they could've spent a little more time making a logo that could fit the kit rather than being huge blocks of bold text on your chest.

Edited 1 August 2022 by Jaspa

[FoxinNotts]

9 hours ago, Ricey said:

I've got carried away and 'fixed' the home kit as well...

 

So, so, so much better

[StanSP]

@Ricey, really good mock ups and much smarter I agree.

 

Where's the gold though ? 

[AKCJ]

16 hours ago, StanSP said:

Doesn't look too bad in this light

 

 

Just me or is the badge on that absolutely massive?

[Saxondale]

TBH, in the flesh, I thought this was alright. Still don’t like a burgundy LCFC badge though. Home kit is guff.

[Ricey]

30 minutes ago, StanSP said:

@Ricey, really good mock ups and much smarter I agree.

 

Where's the gold though ? 

The running fox on the back is gold on the home shirt, just to tick that particular box!

[Arriba Los Zorros]

I actually quite like it ....

 

It's unique, colours are a weird mix but work.

 

Better than some bland monochrome black guff.

 

Our away kits of late tend to be decent colour combinations, and innovative, just not always well executed.

 

Home kit is still honking, mind.

[lcfcdamo]

Hopefully the black and mint kit is going to save us 🤞

[Golden Fox]

On 30/07/2022 at 20:18, FoxInTheBirstallBox said:

At least this is original, I think it looks absolutely great, up there with the burgundy FA cup top

On 30/07/2022 at 20:20, goose2010 said:

So the burgundy is a nod to the FA Cup winning shirt then....

 

 

On 30/07/2022 at 20:36, kingfox said:

Beige  those sleeves should be all burgundy. 

On 31/07/2022 at 09:48, StanSP said:

Or burgundy.

On 31/07/2022 at 10:14, Jonezy said:

Still think after the FA Cup win in burgundy, we should have that as a 2nd or 3rd kit every season.

On 31/07/2022 at 00:57, brucey said:

The shininess of the sponsor is a bit off-putting when the rest of the burgundy detailing is matte.

1 hour ago, Saxondale said:

TBH, in the flesh, I thought this was alright. Still don’t like a burgundy LCFC badge though.

 

Does anybody actually understand that the colour is MAROON and not BURGANDY???

 

From the press release: https://www.lcfc.com/news/2696860/create-iconic--the-202223-leicester-city-third-shirt-by-adidas-on-sale-now - "With maroon highlights serving as a subtle nod to City’s 2020/21 FA Cup triumph"

 

If you are struggling to tell the difference, have read through: https://www.difference101.com/burgundy-vs-maroon-color/ - its not actually that difficult...