Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
HankMarvin

Soyuncu

Recommended Posts

He knows he's not wanted and can walk for free in 10 months. Big contract incoming and reputation in tact because, effectively, one (increasingly clueless) manager didn't fancy him. It'll work out fine for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soyuncu is a specialist central defender who we all know can play on the left in a successful partnership with Evans. We saw it for a year and were laughing all the way to the bank after selling Maguire. Amartey is a useful utility/squad player and a converted midfielder who, therefore, lacks a defender's instincts. He is also uncomfortable playing on the left. Not playing Soyuncu makes absolutely no sense at all. He backed out of a tackle? Give me a break! And what has Praet done wrong? He probably made it clear to Rodgers that he wanted to play. Vindictiveness on Rodger's part? Make no mistake this guy is taking us down!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, LCCFox96 said:

I thought Soyuncu had a decent end to last season and salvaged a little bit of form. I do not understand why he's behind Amartey in the pecking order. Amartey is your man if you want a solid, dependable enough 4th/5th choice CB. We know what Amartey's limitations are and one of them - composure on the ball and ball playing ability - is one Soyuncu's strengths. The Soyuncu-Evans partnership pre-Covid was also our most successful defensive period in recent times, albeit it was a few seasons ago.

 

Soyuncu is a better player than Amartey, his strengths suit our style of play more, and he has a higher ceiling. Rodgers knows that. Ergo it must be a contractual issue or a disagreement between player and manager. Another thing on a long list that needs sorting either way very sharpish. 

Absolutely spot on.

 

People are happily glossing over a few much improved performances for us at the latter stages of the season.

 

Surely that should put “some credit in the bank” so to speak.

 

Big Dan on the other hand is so passive, been at fault for over half of our goals this season and genuinely a poor CB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soyuncu is an example of absence makes better, but he isn’t, he was occasionally improved (from utter toilet) later last season, but still poor at Amartey levels.

Amartey poor

Soyuncu poor

Jannick also poor

Why pick anyone over the other? No idea, attitude? :dunno:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pmcla26 said:

I'd pick Soyuncu first because he's proven for us, that with Evans, he can do it. 

Jannick would be second, as he's proven that he can do it in the Premier League in spells, with Southampton. 

Amartey would be last resort for me, as he's never proven himself to be good enough for us in a pairing (he can be okay on the right side of a back 3 occasionally). 

I get what you are saying about Soyuncu, at his best he is miles ahead of the alternatives, but those times are long past, as ever since the Euro’s  he has been below his best.

Guess I just feel a lot of the judgements are historical rather than contemporary - which is now way to select a player

Hey, wouldn’t be the first time I am wrong and won’t be the last. :D

 

Certaunly hopes he gets back to his best, no question about that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dahnsouff said:

I get what you are saying about Soyuncu, at his best he is miles ahead of the alternatives, but those times are long past, as ever since the Euro’s  he has been below his best.

Guess I just feel a lot of the judgements are historical rather than contemporary - which is now way to select a player

Hey, wouldn’t be the first time I am wrong and won’t be the last. :D

 

Certaunly hopes he gets back to his best, no question about that

Against Brentford at home, Soyuncu was superb, like his form in H1 of 19/20 and most of 20/21. 

 

He's got it in the locker, while Amartey doesn't. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dahnsouff said:

Soyuncu is an example of absence makes better, but he isn’t

 

There’s a maxim in American football:  “The backup quarterback is the best player on the team”

 

Simply meaning, the high-priced guy who isn’t playing is the fans’ golden boy … until he starts playing.

 

FWIW, I think Cags is at least better than Amartey, and suits our play better.  Either BR disagrees or someone above him thinks we're about to get a decent price for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cags was magnificent when he played alongside Evans in a settled back 4. Last season he played alongside Dan and Vesty for a large part without any of our 1st choice fullbacks fit. I remember one incident when he steps up to play the striker offside, but Dan's loitering around playing everyone onside leading to a goal. Yes, he's not turned out as good as many had thought and his progress has stalled, but he's still plenty good enough to play if Fofana doesn't want to. We've conceded 8 goals in 3 games so defence hasn't improved any in his absence. No doubt he'll leave for free at the end of the season and have a pretty decent career I'd guess, but whilst he's here, we should use him.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, coolhandfox said:

You do realise they only come together under Rodgers? 

 

Soyuncu didn't get much of a kick under anyone else.

We had Maguire of course but he only got his chance after he went. Benkovic was injured (again) and so I think Rodgers had to play him by default, I don't think it was a Rodgers masterstroke! He hadn't played him before much if at all. He immediately started playing well next to Evans (as did Maguire). Ironically, it was perhaps Evans that United needed 🤣. For me, Soyuncu's fall from form also falls at the feet of Rodgers sticking him out on the extreme left of a three where he struggled and lost confidence. He'll still make a really good centre half for someone I believe. Sometimes the answers are right under your nose. I think Bassy recently got mom for Ajax also. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, volpeazzurro said:

We had Maguire of course but he only got his chance after he went. Benkovic was injured (again) and so I think Rodgers had to play him by default, I don't think it was a Rodgers masterstroke! He hadn't played him before much if at all. He immediately started playing well next to Evans (as did Maguire). Ironically, it was perhaps Evans that United needed 🤣. For me, Soyuncu's fall from form also falls at the feet of Rodgers sticking him out on the extreme left of a three where he struggled and lost confidence. He'll still make a really good centre half for someone I believe. Sometimes the answers are right under your nose. I think Bassy recently got mom for Ajax also. 

:rolleyes: We wanted Bassey to stay....AS A CENTRE BACK....he wanted to play LB so moved to Rangers, guess which position he played to earn his move to Ajax?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s him, Armarty or Vestegard to partner Evans.  Cags has at least show patches of being miles better than the other two.

 

BR needs to play to the strengths we now have, personally I think that’s defending deeper and protect the back 4.

 

i think Ball playing CBs are quite frankly the least of our worries 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soyuncu and Demiral would be a solid and sensible partnership for us. Right kind of age group and without downplaying us too much they are probable the right kind of players for our level as a team… meaning perhaps no fear of them doing a fofana/ Mahrez

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Finn Claw II said:

It’s him, Armarty or Vestegard to partner Evans.  Cags has at least show patches of being miles better than the other two.

 

BR needs to play to the strengths we now have, personally I think that’s defending deeper and protect the back 4.

 

i think Ball playing CBs are quite frankly the least of our worries 

Brent will probably compound the problems by playing 3 of them rather than 2 decent one's protected by more able midfielders. With Rodgers, it's system before sense, philosophy before practicality. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, volpeazzurro said:

Brent will probably compound the problems by playing 3 of them rather than 2 decent one's protected by more able midfielders. With Rodgers, it's system before sense, philosophy before practicality. 

Hopefully the 2 or 3 would depend on if a RW of suitable quality arrives

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...