Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Lionator

The I cant believe it’s not politics thread.

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Captain... said:

Why is everyone convinced Rishi doesn't have the support of the party members?

Because it’s believed they are largely racist. I’ve no idea either way, I’ve not seen any evidence though.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LVocey said:

You know the Conservative party has wildly flown off to the right when they accuse the richest politician this country has ever seen of being a socialist.

 

I genuinely wonder if the Tory party ever gets anywhere near close to centre-right again

Part of me hopes it never happpens so the swing votes never vote for them again, assign them to the dark ages where they belong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m finding it extremely shocking how far right the Conservative party has become after listening to some of the bile coming out of people like Braverman and Mogg , my only hope is they clear them out as it looks to me like they are having a massive crisis of identity and are split 50/50 with normality and extremism fighting each other. God help us all if the wrong ones win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rishi seems the type of individual who would pay for everyone's drinks at a works event, brushes his teeth soon after eating and goes to bed at exactly 22:00.

Edited by Wymsey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nalis said:

Part of me hopes it never happpens so the swing votes never vote for them again, assign them to the dark ages where they belong

Unfortunately I think there are a lot of people who are more centre ground but are also die hard conservatives who end up getting swept with it the tide right…more to be on the winning side than anything.

 

Until this country starts having a healthier relationship with political conversation and dialogue the centre ground will continue to be a silent majority. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Strokes said:

Because it’s believed they are largely racist. I’ve no idea either way, I’ve not seen any evidence though.


There's been a few polls that shows Mordaunt obliterating everyone else amongst the membership, next one is Truss. Sunak is actually amongst the lowest, and this was when the full range of candidates were in. 
 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuck 20 quid on Truss before the first round results came out at 10/3, into 3s now. Bit annoying because it went out to 4/1 when the first round results were announced and I thought about doubling down but bottled it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Strokes said:

Because it’s believed they are largely racist. I’ve no idea either way, I’ve not seen any evidence though.

Tories think that the furlough scheme caused the current problems. It's the only time over the last 12 years that the welfare state actually did its job so I have 2% of respect for him. 

 

Obviously without it then there would've been mass unemployment, poverty and civil unrest but they're not the brightest bunch. 

 

Also I think you're a bit right, it would be hilarious if the tories started off with 7/11 candidate being BAME and bragging about it, but then ending with a final two who are white.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Lionator said:

Tories think that the furlough scheme caused the current problems. It's the only time over the last 12 years that the welfare state actually did its job so I have 2% of respect for him. 

 

Obviously without it then there would've been mass unemployment, poverty and civil unrest but they're not the brightest bunch. 

 

Also I think you're a bit right, it would be hilarious if the tories started off with 7/11 candidate being BAME and bragging about it, but then ending with a final two who are white.

Furlough was probably the right thing to do. But you can’t print/borrow and spend hundreds of billions of pounds without causing all the economic problems we’re now facing and will continue to suffer for a year or 3. The war in Ukraine has fanned the fire, and god knows how that will finish up. Seems like msm are now primming us for winter fuel rationing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want an example of how utterly messed up the whole system is, Labour this week pledged to remove charitable status for private schools, which means fee payers will have to pay VAT on top of fees. The VAT gets reinvested into public services, apart from the very rich, how can anybody argue against that? Now google it and look at the media coverage of it, all from the fee payer perspective of how this could be catastrophic for private schools. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Lionator said:

If you want an example of how utterly messed up the whole system is, Labour this week pledged to remove charitable status for private schools, which means fee payers will have to pay VAT on top of fees. The VAT gets reinvested into public services, apart from the very rich, how can anybody argue against that? Now google it and look at the media coverage of it, all from the fee payer perspective of how this could be catastrophic for private schools. 

Whilst I think I agree with the policy, it can be argued that this could lead to scholarships for those from poorer backgrounds being cut by private schools, widening the gap between those who can afford private education and those who can't.

 

Of course that can just be achieved by improving state school standards.

 

Another argument against it is that it would reduce private school numbers, forcing some to close and therefore create more strain on the public sector.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LVocey said:

Whilst I think I agree with the policy, it can be argued that this could lead to scholarships for those from poorer backgrounds being cut by private schools, widening the gap between those who can afford private education and those who can't.

 

Of course that can just be achieved by improving state school standards.

 

Another argument against it is that it would reduce private school numbers, forcing some to close and therefore create more strain on the public sector.

It also helps to price out middle class families that cut back on holidays or cars to spend on private education. This will widen the gap further between the middle class and the very rich.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...