Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Aus Fox

Premier League 2022/23 Thread

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

But the second challenge would be unlikely to happen if the shirt pull didn’t occur in the first place. 99/100 the ref blows for a foul in that instance. 

I think he might have got the foul had he made more of the initial pull, but he keeps the ball and plays on. Regardless of how the second challenge comes about, I don't think the ref can pull it back because Traore chose the wrong moment to stop playing and willfully relinquished the ball. He's gonna give the ball away regardless because he stops playing, he doesn't lose the ball in the second challenge he gives it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

Lots of players stop playing when they get fouled and don’t fall to the ground - the refs usually just blow up when they look across to them. In this instance traore half played on but then chose not to - I think the ref was wrong not to disallow the goal on review. It was a clear foul to gain possession. Of all the times when they could justifiably ignore the var they choose this one ! 

This is where the subjectivity comes into it, you think it’s a foul, many others think it’s not. I don’t think there’s anywhere near enough to give the foul, he doesn’t prevent Traore from keeping control of the ball. Forest had one the other week where an Everton player has grabbed a bit of shirt for a split second, MGW decided to throw his arms up and fall down but the ref, for me rightly, called play on and Forest players were incensed. On both occasions players have felt some form of contact and decided they’re going to award themselves a foul, it’s not for them to decide. There’s supposed to be a higher threshold for fouls this season, which for me is the right decision with how the league was going. It just needs to be consistent across every game, but as we see when everyone views it differently how do you get to that? And do you get to a point where fans, players and managers don’t react in the manner we have seen lately?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ealingfox said:

What a ridiculous decision that Southampton penalty against Spurs was. When was the last time we got a stroke of luck like that? Feels like nothing falling for us now.

Dont like Spurs at all, but I have to say thought it was a woeful decision never a penalty

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, The Bear said:

Please don't talk about things you haven't got a clue about. This has been going on for 3 seasons since VAR first came in. Constantly on the end of utterly dreadful decisions every season. 

false

 

gained 3 points off having VAR last season: https://m.allfootballapp.com/amp/news/EPL/How-the-21-22-Premier-League-table-would-look-if-we-didn’t-have-VAR/2849740

 

gained 1 point off having VAR in 2020/21: https://www.planetfootball.com/quick-reads/how-the-premier-league-table-would-look-if-we-didnt-have-var-in-2020-21/

 

lost 5 points off having it in 2019/20: https://www.givemesport.com/1586941-how-the-final-premier-league-table-would-look-without-var-this-season/

 

net points difference across 3 seasons: -1

 

for reference we'd have been 3 points better off across 3 seasons without it.

 

this is literally just a cognitive bias, you remember subjective decisions by VAR against you as robbery and subjective decisions for you as definitely correct, like fans of every other club 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, The Doctor said:

false

 

gained 3 points off having VAR last season: https://m.allfootballapp.com/amp/news/EPL/How-the-21-22-Premier-League-table-would-look-if-we-didn’t-have-VAR/2849740

 

gained 1 point off having VAR in 2020/21: https://www.planetfootball.com/quick-reads/how-the-premier-league-table-would-look-if-we-didnt-have-var-in-2020-21/

 

lost 5 points off having it in 2019/20: https://www.givemesport.com/1586941-how-the-final-premier-league-table-would-look-without-var-this-season/

 

net points difference across 3 seasons: -1

 

for reference we'd have been 3 points better off across 3 seasons without it.

 

this is literally just a cognitive bias, you remember subjective decisions by VAR against you as robbery and subjective decisions for you as definitely correct, like fans of every other club 

Nope, I'm pretty sure it's the product of a grand anti-Wolves conspiracy and there's no other explanation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The Doctor said:

false

 

gained 3 points off having VAR last season: https://m.allfootballapp.com/amp/news/EPL/How-the-21-22-Premier-League-table-would-look-if-we-didn’t-have-VAR/2849740

 

gained 1 point off having VAR in 2020/21: https://www.planetfootball.com/quick-reads/how-the-premier-league-table-would-look-if-we-didnt-have-var-in-2020-21/

 

lost 5 points off having it in 2019/20: https://www.givemesport.com/1586941-how-the-final-premier-league-table-would-look-without-var-this-season/

 

net points difference across 3 seasons: -1

 

for reference we'd have been 3 points better off across 3 seasons without it.

 

this is literally just a cognitive bias, you remember subjective decisions by VAR against you as robbery and subjective decisions for you as definitely correct, like fans of every other club 

Those tables are never accurate. Firstly they don't consider stuff that should have been looked at by VAR and wasn't. Plus they admit it's only the first VAR decision of each game, so will have missed plenty of others.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Leicester_Loyal said:

Traore one was definitely a foul and a free kick should have been given IMO, but obviously you play to the whistle, basic stuff.

Definitely wasn't a foul, well deserved goal...he was brought into my  FPL team for a -4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Bear said:

Those tables are never accurate. Firstly they don't consider stuff that should have been looked at by VAR and wasn't. Plus they admit it's only the first VAR decision of each game, so will have missed plenty of others.

Because there's no such thing. VAR routinely checks goals and tackles, but it can only intervene for penalties, red cards and offsides. So anything you're talking about falls into one of two categories: 1) Not in the scope of VAR. 2) Subjective decision which wasn't a clear error that VAR would intervene to change, to which I bring you back to:

 

3 hours ago, The Doctor said:

this is literally just a cognitive bias, you remember subjective decisions by VAR against you as robbery and subjective decisions for you as definitely correct, like fans of every other club 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Ian Nacho said:

Why on earth isn’t the arsenal game on tv? Disgusting. 

Despite being broadcast on a Sunday, the game was originally pencilled in for the Saturday 3pm slot - for which there is still a live football television blackout across the country.

 

Even though it had been moved, broadcasters had used up their allocation of games for the weekend with the FA Cup dominating the airwaves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said:

Despite being broadcast on a Sunday, the game was originally pencilled in for the Saturday 3pm slot - for which there is still a live football television blackout across the country.

 

Even though it had been moved, broadcasters had used up their allocation of games for the weekend with the FA Cup dominating the airwaves.

Bonkers. 

The amount customers pay for the ability to watch football, and we don't put games on for stupidest reasons 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Col city fan

Im getting a few quid on Palace to be relegated.

They have some good players but look in complete disarray.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:

Bonkers. 

The amount customers pay for the ability to watch football, and we don't put games on for stupidest reasons 

The customers get to watch the exact same number of live games across the season, within the various broadcasting agreements. Neither Sky or BT chose the Arsenal game, so it isn’t being shown live. The matches that they did pick from this gameweek, will be shown whenever the rearranged games take place. It’s quite simple really, but it appears a lot of people just don’t understand how it works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Col city fan said:

Im getting a few quid on Palace to be relegated.

They have some good players but look in complete disarray.

 

Their game against us is so important. We have a game in hand anyway but if we beat them we leave them in serious poo. If we lose I think we are done. If we play prime high line Brendan ball, it’s going to be a tough afternoon. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, EastNeukFox said:

The customers get to watch the exact same number of live games across the season, within the various broadcasting agreements. Neither Sky or BT chose the Arsenal game, so it isn’t being shown live. The matches that they did pick from this gameweek, will be shown whenever the rearranged games take place. It’s quite simple really, but it appears a lot of people just don’t understand how it works.

I understand how it works cheers, the system itself is poor given customers in this country you pay to watch certain matches, whilst in pretty much every other country a single fee gives you access to every game.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...