Cincinnati Fox Posted 20 January 2023 Share Posted 20 January 2023 Craig Dawson to wolves for 3 million . We should have been looking at this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot Posted 20 January 2023 Share Posted 20 January 2023 2 hours ago, JimJams said: I'm not sure his 5 goals last season or 2 this would be worth killing for. Bit short sighted imo, he's limited yeah but he's a different option, hold the ball up bring others in to play etc, he was good when he was here and still good enough to do a job now, doesn't have to be him, man u just got that weghorst, anyone like that for a different angle but under this manager it's 1 size fits all and it's not working. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bear Posted 20 January 2023 Share Posted 20 January 2023 16 minutes ago, Cincinnati Fox said: Craig Dawson to wolves for 3 million . We should have been looking at this. He wanted to move back to the West Midlands for family reasons. Don't know if Leicester would have been close enough. Maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lambert09 Posted 21 January 2023 Share Posted 21 January 2023 7 hours ago, Cincinnati Fox said: Craig Dawson to wolves for 3 million . We should have been looking at this. this is exactly the type of transfer we are trying to move away from. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cincinnati Fox Posted 21 January 2023 Share Posted 21 January 2023 1 hour ago, Lambert09 said: this is exactly the type of transfer we are trying to move away from. Need a balance ! Look at what god did!! young and Hungry mixed with model pros. nobby Esteban kevin 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox 4 Life Posted 21 January 2023 Share Posted 21 January 2023 Danjuma to Everton on loan, good signing that! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post -sodapop Posted 21 January 2023 Popular Post Share Posted 21 January 2023 On 19/01/2023 at 18:02, Steve Earle said: Really makes you wonder if Omari Hutchinson's regretting his decision to leave Arsenal to get minutes to a club who have signed two more wingers for more than 130m combined since he joined . Maybe there's an in there. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Flair Posted 21 January 2023 Share Posted 21 January 2023 1 hour ago, -sodapop said: Really makes you wonder if Omari Hutchinson's regretting his decision to leave Arsenal to get minutes to a club who have signed two more wingers for more than 130m combined since he joined . Maybe there's an in there. Bang on, was an odd move anyway. He's now got a further 6 new wingers and attackers in front of him. We should be all over him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankieADZ Posted 21 January 2023 Share Posted 21 January 2023 tbf if you are an under 21 player(not first team) at chelsea now you'd certainly be having second thoughts about things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkey123 Posted 21 January 2023 Share Posted 21 January 2023 Seems cheap? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st albans fox Posted 21 January 2023 Share Posted 21 January 2023 13 hours ago, The Bear said: He wanted to move back to the West Midlands for family reasons. Don't know if Leicester would have been close enough. Maybe. It would have but wolves is a better fit for him so why not …. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blanchflower78 Posted 21 January 2023 Share Posted 21 January 2023 Danjuma agreed to join Everton on loan. You cannot emphasise enough just how important it is we sign at least one winger! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StriderHiryu Posted 21 January 2023 Share Posted 21 January 2023 43 minutes ago, Clarkey123 said: Seems cheap? He was very impressive at the World Cup. I think it's important for Leicester to return to the "buy promising young players" angle though and am happy we seemed to have gone back to that way. The problem with the older players is whilst their transfer fees can be cheap, their wages usually are not. And that's why all teams end up with dead weight players they can't shift. That's why players like Dawson, Ings, etc might be good for the short term but will eventually get you into trouble. Juarnovic is 27... so not too old. At that age with a 3 or 4 year contract you probably don't get to sell them on, but worst case scenario he'd be 31 when he leaves on a free, and Union will have him for the peak of his career. He's actually their record signing and they have a good record of scouting, so I think that is a good deal for them. I think it's highly important we keep going for players like Fofana, Faes, Kristiansen, etc because those are the type of players who can end up being sold for 3-4x for what we paid for them. And that's how the club sustains itself! Sadly with clubs like Chelsea in the league there simply isn't a way we can compete other than to exploit them with high transfer fees. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarkey123 Posted 21 January 2023 Share Posted 21 January 2023 35 minutes ago, StriderHiryu said: He was very impressive at the World Cup. I think it's important for Leicester to return to the "buy promising young players" angle though and am happy we seemed to have gone back to that way. The problem with the older players is whilst their transfer fees can be cheap, their wages usually are not. And that's why all teams end up with dead weight players they can't shift. That's why players like Dawson, Ings, etc might be good for the short term but will eventually get you into trouble. Juarnovic is 27... so not too old. At that age with a 3 or 4 year contract you probably don't get to sell them on, but worst case scenario he'd be 31 when he leaves on a free, and Union will have him for the peak of his career. He's actually their record signing and they have a good record of scouting, so I think that is a good deal for them. I think it's highly important we keep going for players like Fofana, Faes, Kristiansen, etc because those are the type of players who can end up being sold for 3-4x for what we paid for them. And that's how the club sustains itself! Sadly with clubs like Chelsea in the league there simply isn't a way we can compete other than to exploit them with high transfer fees. Yeah agree on the most part, although i think it’s ok to chuck in the odd more seasoned pro to add the experience, especially one who’s likely to be a starter. Seeing how he performed at the World Cup, and the desire the Croatians play with, you’d think he’d be just what we need. Can’t imagine he’d be on wages above £50,000 a week at Celtic either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingfox Posted 21 January 2023 Share Posted 21 January 2023 Brighton’s scouting team potentially at it again, now picking up one of the best talents out of Sweden. The Scandinavian countries have some potential gems. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunbury Fox Posted 21 January 2023 Share Posted 21 January 2023 Chelsea's transfer policy is mind boggling. Once the Madueke deal goes through that leaves them with the following wide attackers: Ziyech, Pulisic, Sterling, Mudryk, Madueke, as well as Mount and Havertz who can play in those positions. Meantime, we've struggled through this season with 1 proper wide man!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Flair Posted 21 January 2023 Share Posted 21 January 2023 1 hour ago, kingfox said: Brighton’s scouting team potentially at it again, now picking up one of the best talents out of Sweden. The Scandinavian countries have some potential gems. The problem is, we seem to have no financial flexibility or interest in spending money on development players. Whether that's players for our academy or players thst go on loan and develop to become 1st team here or sold on for a profit to reinvest in the model. Its surely the logical plan for having the best facilities in the world and yet we've made no attempts to do so, even before the financial issues. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJQuik Posted 21 January 2023 Share Posted 21 January 2023 Transfer coup as chelsea raid accrington stanley for top crawley town target Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urban fox Posted 22 January 2023 Share Posted 22 January 2023 Chelsea could be investigated for breach of FFP due to use of long contracts to attempt spread of cost through amortisation. Apparantly there is a uefa rule that states maximum contract length must not exceed 5 years. Chelsea are claiming that the contracts under question are five years with options to extend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moore_94 Posted 22 January 2023 Share Posted 22 January 2023 Just now, urban fox said: Chelsea could be investigated for breach of FFP due to use of long contracts to attempt spread of cost through amortisation. Apparantly there is a uefa rule that states maximum contract length must not exceed 5 years. Chelsea are claiming that the contracts under question are five years with options to extend. If they go after Chelsea for it, Chelsea could easily start pointing at a lot of other clubs that have given contracts longer than 5 years to players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanSP Posted 22 January 2023 Share Posted 22 January 2023 1 minute ago, moore_94 said: If they go after Chelsea for it, Chelsea could easily start pointing at a lot of other clubs that have given contracts longer than 5 years to players Haven't we just given Kristiansen a 5 and a half year contract Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chelmofox Posted 22 January 2023 Share Posted 22 January 2023 4 minutes ago, urban fox said: Chelsea could be investigated for breach of FFP due to use of long contracts to attempt spread of cost through amortisation. Apparantly there is a uefa rule that states maximum contract length must not exceed 5 years. Chelsea are claiming that the contracts under question are five years with options to extend. Well, if the contracts are 5 years then thats what should be used when Amortising? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urban fox Posted 22 January 2023 Share Posted 22 January 2023 9 minutes ago, StanSP said: Haven't we just given Kristiansen a 5 and a half year contract Yep. That's what got me thinking when I read the article. Presuming that as it's a January transfer it is permitted to extend to the end of a season to bring into line with the normal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Flair Posted 22 January 2023 Share Posted 22 January 2023 RB Salzburg have signed Oscar Gloukh, FFS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sly Posted 22 January 2023 Share Posted 22 January 2023 What happened to the Anthony Gordon transfer thread 😂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts