Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
lcfcsnow

Other clubs transfer news

Recommended Posts

Chris Richards to Palace almost done. Could rise to £20million according to Fabrizio. Good signing for them although they do already have Guehi and Andersen so not convinced he massively improves them in the short term. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CrispinLA in Texas said:

What do you think... should we keep Kelechi or sell? Is ever going to be used here or will he be benched?

I've come to the difficult conclusion that I think we should sell.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Foxes96 said:

Chris Richards to Palace almost done. Could rise to £20million according to Fabrizio. Good signing for them although they do already have Guehi and Andersen so not convinced he massively improves them in the short term. 

As much as I know a number of us liked the idea of us signing him, this does remove one more competitor for Colwill...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Cardiff_Fox said:

Interested to see how he does. Not a great record of Italian forwards in the PL over recent years. Zola a rarity 

Only 16 in 41 last year so he isn't tearing it up. I've never seen him play but it's hard to see what the fuss is about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

West Ham have been able to spend that kind of money, simply because they haven't got a huge squad. They had about 18/19 senior players at the start of the window, with three being keepers. Then when you realise we're paying Bertrand about twice what they pay Coufal, and we're paying Vestergaard the same as they pay Soucek, you begin to realise where we are going wrong financially, in terms of being able to compete on a transfer front.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, FoxyLeon said:

West Ham have been able to spend that kind of money, simply because they haven't got a huge squad. They had about 18/19 senior players at the start of the window, with three being keepers. Then when you realise we're paying Bertrand about twice what they pay Coufal, and we're paying Vestergaard the same as they pay Soucek, you begin to realise where we are going wrong financially, in terms of being able to compete on a transfer front.

West ham are about 2 years behind us. They're now attempting to push the boat out and try and establish themselves as best of the rest..

 

We did really well to get 5th place twice. Let's see where they end up.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus and zinchenko to arsenal. Probably two of the more underated, team orientated Man City players. Both have the right attitude, are young and will really help Arsenal. I’d have liked to seen either here as not only are they both good technical players but they have a lot of character, attitude, tenacity and resilience that would be useful here. Breaking into the top six has got more difficult this year with the way spurs arsenal have recruited this summer. Hope I’m wrong. 

Edited by Supergray22
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LFox99 said:

£15m offer for Brighton's Neal Maupay from Salernitana in Serie A....

Surely we could offload Kele for close to double 

They’re similar players. Maupay is not the reason for Brighton’s scoring woes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think our wages to turnover was something like 95% in the last set of accounts. 
 

Ideally this should be around 60 - 70 percent or lower! 
 

We’re ideally needing to drop our squad size by 5 to 6 players. This will become easier next season though, as we’ll drop some big earners off the wage bill. This is why certain contract deals are difficult. The money we’ve made in transfer has substituted the wage bill. 
 

We’ve overpaid on certain players. We need to sell assets to balance the books and back fill with youth players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sly said:

I think our wages to turnover was something like 95% in the last set of accounts. 
 

Ideally this should be around 60 - 70 percent or lower! 
 

We’re ideally needing to drop our squad size by 5 to 6 players. This will become easier next season though, as we’ll drop some big earners off the wage bill. This is why certain contract deals are difficult. The money we’ve made in transfer has substituted the wage bill. 
 

We’ve overpaid on certain players. We need to sell assets to balance the books and back fill with youth players. 

Getting our wages down to 70% of turnover is a nightmare and will make it very difficult to compete. You can't expect to keep successful players because every contract renewal on big wage increases will mean selling other players to fund it and then replace those with players on smaller wages.

 

It means everything has to run so perfectly and other clubs will try and exploit that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Getting our wages down to 70% of turnover is a nightmare and will make it very difficult to compete. You can't expect to keep successful players because every contract renewal on big wage increases will mean selling other players to fund it and then replace those with players on smaller wages.

 

It means everything has to run so perfectly and other clubs will try and exploit that. 

That’s why we need more extensive outside investment, larger sponsorship deals, but not sure KP, would be keen.  :dunno:

Like pull our first lever and sell 50% of future broadcast rights for the Correndon Cup defence…

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without stating the obvious, if the stadium extension isn’t going ahead (or quickly enough), what are our other options of a quick profit (other than player sales)?

 

Can we not do something commercially with our state of the art training ground? 
 

Edit: just saw Dahnsouff comment -

 

2 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

That’s why we need more extensive outside investment, larger sponsorship deals, but not sure KP, would be keen.  :dunno:

Like pull our first lever and sell 50% of future broadcast rights for the Correndon Cup defence…

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dahnsouff said:

That’s why we need more extensive outside investment, larger sponsorship deals, but not sure KP, would be keen.  :dunno:

Like pull our first lever and sell 50% of future broadcast rights for the Correndon Cup defence…

The thing is you can't really magic up over the market value commercial revenue and sponsorship unless you want to risk the microscope being on you and I guarantee a club like us wouldn't get away with it like Man City and others have. 

 

We absolutely need to increase that but if our wage bill is £180m as it stands and we pull in £200m. 70% of £200m is £140m, to lose £40m in wages is 8 players on £100k a week. It's going to be very difficult to do and compete.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...