Rodgers in or out?

[Unabomber]

anyone voting in and you explain why? Not being a dick just genuinely interested to hear the other side.

[coolhandfox]

I have no idea what the best idea is, for me it would depend on if we have a good replacement in mind.

[Sharpe's Fox]

If Brendan has million number of fans i am one of them 🙋🏻. if Brendan has ten fans i am one of them. if Brendan have only one fan and that is me 🙋🏼🙋🏽🙋🏾. if Brendan has no fans, that means i am no more on the earth 😢. if world against the Brendan, i am against the world ❌🌍☄️. i love #Brendan till my last breath.. 😍 .. Die Hard fan of Brendan 🤓🌹. Hit Like If you Think Brendan Best manager  & Smart In the world 🤠

[fleshdaddy]

13 minutes ago, Deano79 said:

We can’t afford to sack him !! 

This!

 

We need to sell players before we can buy, so what makes people think we can afford to pay Rodgers off? Don't get me wrong, I think it's time for a change and have done for a while...but yeah, we can't afford to sack him so we're stuck with him, unfortunately.

Edited 13 August 2022 by fleshdaddy

[kristianity77]

1 minute ago, coolhandfox said:

I have no idea what the best idea is, for me it would depend on if we have a good replacement in mind.

The way I see it is, could anyone realistically, do any worse.  You don't hold on to an employee because you aren't sure if there is anyone better available than what you have that is destroying the club to its core.

[Foxdiamond]

Will reserve judgement till after Palace game on 15 October. We will have played more of the top sides plus some we are expected to beat. 

[Lako42]

Should have sacked him the night he embarrassed and shamed this club in Nottingham last season.  

 

 

[coolhandfox]

Just now, kristianity77 said:

The way I see it is, could anyone realistically, do any worse.  You don't hold on to an employee because you aren't sure if there is anyone better available than what you have that is destroying the club to its core.

Yes, just look at Man U.

[Kinowe Soorie]

I had doubts with some of the weak minded, capitulation in games, Bournemouth and Aston Villa spring to mind. But the Notts Forest game was the final nail, for me. 
He just doesn’t deserve a pay off though, to get him out of the club.

[Lako42]

1 minute ago, coolhandfox said:

Yes, just look at Man U.

No

[Daggers]

15 minutes ago, Deano79 said:

We can’t afford to sack him !! 

Managerial contracts have a sack clause that stipulates the sum payable - he does not get the full balance. It is less than a year’s salary, precise term negotiated on signing. 

[TheFiveTime]

and replace with who? in for now. Until someone finds a good replacement

[HybridFox]

In because what's the point at this stage when we can't sign anyone

[Lako42]

1 minute ago, TheFiveTime said:

and replace with who? in for now. Until someone finds a good replacement

You want someone on here to find a replacement? 

 

Bit weird

Edited 13 August 2022 by Lako42

[kristianity77]

2 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Yes, just look at Man U.

Nonsense.  That guy is 2 games in to his tenure.  Let's see where they are in 10 games time.  They will be streets above us in the table. 

 

 

[Guest foxestalkisfullofidiots]

We would have to do what Spurs did to Poch, put him on gardening leave and just wait for someone to come in for him, no way could we pay up his contract

[Dames]

3 minutes ago, Daggers said:

Managerial contracts have a sack clause that stipulates the sum payable - he does not get the full balance. It is less than a year’s salary, precise term negotiated on signing. 

Are we sure theres even one in Rodgers contract? The way the club has dropped the ball with contracts in recent years it wouldnt surprise me if they left this out as a way of keeping Rodgers around.

[FoxInTheBirstallBox]

12 minutes ago, Unabomber said:

anyone voting in and you explain why? Not being a dick just genuinely interested to hear the other side.

I genuinely think we can't afford to sack him AND pay to get in a good enough replacement. 

 

We'll bumble through this season, not getting top 4, but not getting relegated, and I'm fine with that. Not every season will be incredible, long term stability financially is worth wayyyy more than a rash sacking and bring in a stop gap manager.

[Corky]

My position in Rodgers has been that it was probably best that we parted ways but understood we'd have to be in serious bother at the bottom of the whole squad being in revolt before change is made. I get that the club don't want pay out unless they have to and he had credit in the bank.

 

Now, though, it feels we've reached the end. Same old mistakes, bizarre comments, odd selections and this overblown lack of signings issue when we have a decent squad.

 

He's done well but I just see us limping on now unless he changes approach which I can't see.

[Pliskin]

Unfortunately you can’t just change 11 players. Personally I think he’s lost the lads. 

[Tielemans63]

Taken us as far as he can, sadly. 

[Phenom]

Rudkin needs to go with him.

[Bob Weasel Fox]

I have voted Rodger’s in but only just

 

ever since that despicable defeat to  F@@est last season I haven’t got that much respect for him - he needs to turn things around and quickly 

[Daggers]

1 minute ago, Dames said:

Are we sure theres even one in Rodgers contract? The way the club has dropped the ball with contracts in recent years it wouldnt surprise me if they left this out as a way of keeping Rodgers around.

No idea, eh. Only those privy to the contract will. My bigger fear is that they won’t have begun succession planning. 

[Hitesh]

In for now because what is your point in replacing him now and more so, who could we get in / want to come knowing we're selling and not buying any players. 

 

And we can't afford him to be sacked.