Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Wymsey

Also in the News - Part 2

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, The Doctor said:

Yes potential. Whether trans women maintain an athletic advantage (since transfeminine bodies on HRT are not equivalent to male bodies) is complicated. Take Lia Thomas as an a high profile example, her record competing in the mens 500 free style prior to HRT was 4:18.72, 105.0% of the record time (4:06.32), and podiumed. She plummeted to 400 rankings competing in men's swimming while on HRT then swimming in women's, podiumed with a 500 freestyle time of 4:33.24, 103.5% of the women's record finish (4:24.06). Now, is that slightly better relative finish because she still maintains some biological advantage or is it because she's a couple of years older and more experienced.

 

The proportion of trans athletes is much smaller than the proportion of trans people in society as a whole, is that because the reduction in performance associated with HRT makes them uncompetitive or because of structural obstacles meaning less trans people want to pursue sports.

 

studies into reductions in athletic performance, or more specifically attributes believed to correlate to athletic performance, show slight differences that don't then play out in practice, is it because these attributes don't correlate as neatly as we think, or is it a limitation of study length meaning the full reduction in performance isn't achieved during the study period?

 

this is a far more complicated topic than you make out.

You are making it complicated when it isn’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, FoxesDeb said:

It is according to the Olympic committee apparently 

Yeah and about a thousand other sports aren’t. Look I’m not arguing every sport requires sex segregation.  See some equestrian sports manage very well without it, but many do and they should protect it.  Who nows what chess are up to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, FoxesDeb said:

Probably nothing more than the official records as documented by the hospital. 

Probably.

 

But I meant her scrap notes where she allegedly says shocking stuff about the incidents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sport:- A game, competition, or activity needing physical effort and skill, done according to rules, for enjoyment or as a job.

Cricket, tennis and golf undoubtedly fit the dictionary definition, but perhaps not snooker or darts and definitely not chess, unless moving the pieces counts as physical effort. Blasting the brains out of pheasants isn't my idea of 'sport' either.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, SouthStandUpperTier said:

Cricket isn't a sport either. Anything that has to stop for lunch, tea, or a bit of light drizzle is not a sport.

It's a sport. There are 11 men / women on a field and a ball. Textbook sport. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SouthStandUpperTier said:

At any one time 9 of them are sat in the pavilion eating cucumber sandwiches and Maude's victoria sponge cake. Not a sport. Sorry.

Would it be a sport if they were swigging beer? There's absolutely nothing wrong with cucumber sandwiches or sponge cake. Just thinking about cucumber in vinegar makes my mouth water, like Pavlov's dogs salivating when hearing a bell. Conditioning can infliuence much in life - even moaning about something that might be regarded as middle class!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jon the Hat said:

Yeah and about a thousand other sports aren’t. Look I’m not arguing every sport requires sex segregation.  See some equestrian sports manage very well without it, but many do and they should protect it.  Who nows what chess are up to.

Thank you for clarifying your position.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, String fellow said:

Sport:- A game, competition, or activity needing physical effort and skill, done according to rules, for enjoyment or as a job.

Cricket, tennis and golf undoubtedly fit the dictionary definition, but perhaps not snooker or darts and definitely not chess, unless moving the pieces counts as physical effort. Blasting the brains out of pheasants isn't my idea of 'sport' either.

Basically a lot of sports that get added that just the Americans play so they can dominate the medal table. Soon sports like cricket, snooker and darts get added their doomed. A lot more countries play cricket than rounders.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, The Doctor said:

Not at all, it is complicated unless you take a dogmatic "science of trans bodies doesn't matter" position. 

Most males have a physiological advantage over most females in most sports.  That is enough to segregate sports by sex.  Gender is irrelevant.

Edited by Jon the Hat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon the Hat said:

Most males have a physiological advantage over most females in most sports.  That is enough to segregate sports by sex.  Gender is irrelevant.

Trans women on hormone therapy and cis men are not biologically equivalent and cannot be cross compared. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...