Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Sol thewall Bamba

Rudkin

By Sol thewall Bamba, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Collymore

Collymore

Posted
Posted (edited)

We can talk until the cows come home but there's no way, absolutely zero chance that Rudders gets the chop while Top's here. The best we can hope for is a change of job role or some new structural/ethos change in the way we do decision making as a club.

 

Having had a 'review' at the start of the season into last season's horror show and seemingly nothing really has changed, I wouldn't hold my breath. 

Edited by Collymore
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stadt

Stadt

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

Surely Rudkin didnt hold sufficient power over the owner and Susan Whelan that he could effectively block the sacking of Rodgers, if that is true then that is absolute madness and on which case the relegation is pretty much on him, which you would have thought would have led to him losing his job. 
 

although it does make you wonder just how much accountability and responsibility he has taken within the club’s heirarchy for last seasons utter shit show and maybe as a consequence Top stepped in to oversee the appointment of Enzo, which does suggest Rudkin has lost some support and credibility.
 

My only hope is if he is as complicit in our demise last season and some of the other things being bandied out about him have even a modicum of truth, that he has been given one final opportunity to clear up his own mess or better still he is serving a pre-agreed exit from his role which has a severance package linked to outgoing performance in readiness for a new sporting director to come in from next season. 
 

His lack of involvement in the recruitment of Enzo demonstrates that Top has lost some trust in the man. 

I think it’s more likely the club just operate on a whim and not procedurally at all. 
 

If you didn’t trust your DoF you’d replace him, not go over his head and leave him in his post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CosbehFox

CosbehFox

Posted
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Stadt said:

I think it’s more likely the club just operate on a whim and not procedurally at all. 
 

If you didn’t trust your DoF you’d replace him, not go over his head and leave him in his post.

Post Rodgers sacking an utter mess at that level (and agents etc quite aware of this and utilise it). 
 

The lines blur when you have situations like Whelan sorting transfer deals with Chelsea and Man U which we do know for fact 

Edited by CosbehFox
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MattFox

MattFox

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

Post Rodgers sacking an utter mess at that level (and agents etc quite aware of this and utilise it). 
 

The lines blur when you have situations like Whelan sorting transfer deals with Chelsea and Man U which we do know for fact 

It’s a royal court and whoever has Top’s ear/access on that said day usually get their way

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stadt

Stadt

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, CosbehFox said:

Post Rodgers sacking an utter mess at that level (and agents etc quite aware of this and utilise it). 
 

The lines blur when you have situations like Whelan sorting transfer deals with Chelsea and Man U which we do know for fact 

 

2 hours ago, MattFox said:

It’s a royal court and whoever has Top’s ear/access on that said day usually get their way

 

 

Good to know we operate in a way befitting a business turning over nine figures! 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mickyblueeyes

Mickyblueeyes

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, Dan LCFC said:

Tanner in the Athletic back in May;

 

image.png.f47787539608b4a17856de23caf0203d.png

 

 

There were hints on here that there was somebody digging in their heels on getting Rodgers out the door and an assumption that it was Top. Turned out it was Rudkin all along.

imagine how tinpot and incompetent you must be to keep someone (rather beg) who “doesn’t believe” in the club anymore. 
 

If it was another club, we’d be taking the piss. It’s embarrassing. Still hurts how so many disregarded something so important to many of us. It’s why each time I get excited about us I remember it’s probably going to hit a wall due to this group in charge/ownership. 
 

Ah well. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LFox99

LFox99

Posted
Posted

Let's talk about the fact that we've got: Iversen, Ward, Thomas, Praet, Souttar, Daka, Choudhury on our books and none of them will ever be sold, however in sheer desperation he's gonna bin off our best player in the middle of a promotion battle

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fox_favourite

fox_favourite

Posted
Posted (edited)

He's the sort of bloke that tucks a napkin under his chin and pour custard from his bowl into his mouth and dribbles

5 minutes ago, Trelleh said:

He’s the sort of bloke that drops his pants to his ankles at urinals.

 

Edited by fox_favourite
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hales

Hales

Posted
Posted
Just now, Pliskin said:

Time to make a stand and get this guy ****ed off. He’s incompetent and he’s been saved by our recent success. The only way he goes is if fans actively call for his head. 

Read that quickly and thought you said impotent 🤭😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...