Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
HankMarvin

Barnes

Recommended Posts

Reported to be a £25mn bid from the oil State toon which would be an absolute bargain for a 15 goal last season winger. The offloading could begin to look more like a fire sale if he goes for anything under £40mn.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

£25-30m is the going rate for a Championship player, but Barnes is a proven PL player stepping down to the Championship if he's made to stay.

 

As soon as muck like Buendia was going for £35m a few years back, the bar was set. £40m minimum.

Villa bought Buendia after getting Norwich promoted, rather than after Norwich got relegated so it was harder to prise him away from them as they didn't need to sell. Plus Villa had to outbid Arsenal for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, lucybro04 said:

Villa bought Buendia after getting Norwich promoted, rather than after Norwich got relegated so it was harder to prise him away from them as they didn't need to sell. Plus Villa had to outbid Arsenal for him

But barnes is surely a lot better and has actually achieved something,  So should surely be around 40m 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can say what we want about Barnes but he doesn’t seem to be forcing a move, has 2 years left and delivers numbers better than nearly all in his position in the prem and has done so I good teams and poor ones. 
 

Anything below 40m is criminal IMO. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, lucybro04 said:

Villa bought Buendia after getting Norwich promoted, rather than after Norwich got relegated so it was harder to prise him away from them as they didn't need to sell. Plus Villa had to outbid Arsenal for him

OK, Man City paid £43m for Nathan Ake the summer Bournemouth got relegated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, elvisfmcfly said:

Water itself isn’t actually wet though only dry solid objects that water absorbs into can be wet. 

OK there's 2 people who think this is funny, google is water wet and find out.

 

Also Barnes mustn't be sold for any less than 40 million or it's pointless. 

Edited by elvisfmcfly
Staying on topic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The mail article that talks about the £25 million is definitely talking from the Newcastle perspective, rather than this being briefed by Leicester's side. I remember articles saying Maguire was going for £30m. 

 

The figure definitely feels low so I wouldn't get so worked up from a press release just yet. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newcastle would absolutely the worst place for the lad to go. They wouldn’t be able to get him out the nightclubs.

 

That and 25 million is an insult, we need to put our foot down with them now and tell them we won’t be doing any dealings with them at all in the future even if it spites ourselves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

Needs to be minimum £40m upfront

 

Anything less is just an absolute failure from us

Well we have form on the failure front don´t we?   This may well turn out to be a defining moment for Rudkin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kingkisnorbo said:

All this “Anything less than (insert eye watering fee) is a disgrace” fluff has to stop. It doesn’t matter. If he wants out, get it done.

Or anyone who posts it should be banned from posting:

  • It takes us ages to get these sales finalised 
  • Its a scandal that players run contracts down

25 mil does feel light though, and somewhat hoping thats a low balled figure to make the 35 mil feel a little better when it foes through.

 

Not convinced Newcastle is the right choice for him, but time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kingkisnorbo said:

All this “Anything less than (insert eye watering fee) is a disgrace” fluff has to stop. It doesn’t matter. If he wants out, get it done.

I think the whole point of having an asset, that you also invest in, is to make the most money from it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SemperEadem said:

If he wants out gerrim gone.

We don't know that he does want out though, do we? There's a big difference between a player who is willing to move if his club wants him to and one who is actively seeking to leave and will throw his toys out of the pram if he doesn't get it. From what I've heard, Barnes would not be unhappy if he stayed and would definitely not do a Fofana if we don't accept Newcastle's offer.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...