Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
HankMarvin

Barnes

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Diffco said:

Great player on his day, absolute knack for pin point strokey finishes. Very important for the team over the last 4/5 years. But also very one dimensional, no defensive nous. Lost the ability to dribble as time went on. Was limited in linking play if he wasn't 2 on 2 attacking. Passing was limited, couldn't cross. But yeah could finish well given the angle. 

 

Being a bright young spark you can't blame either him or the team for moving on. Could have a stellar career from here if he applies himself. To good for the Championship, settled in the Prem. Leaves a hole but it's a hole than can be filled if the club does it's due diligence. 

Spot on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

****ing hell. We are such an embarrassment of a football club these days. A player of his profile goes for well over £50m, especially with these types of clubs who effectively print money. We are just so, so badly run. When did it just flip to a bunch of imbeciles running lcfc? 

Edited by sdb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just can't help feeling we've been short changed with this. With the English tax should be going for £45m+. Especially when fecking Gordon's gone for more...

 

Will miss Harvey, not often you get quality local lads doing well as part of the first team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand people questioning the price. Player obviously wants the move and has no hunger to play in the Championship. Anything close to 40 million is a good price. Great player, but we rebuild. Good luck Harvey in the Champions League! 

Edited by scinnell
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, James_lcfc said:

I see the point of those complaining about the fee, but we have lost a lot of our leverage after getting relegated.

 

Plus it seemed like only one club really wanted him. There wasn’t a way of driving the price up.

 

The club have done OK considering.

This. Not sure what world some of our fans live in but it’s not planet earth. 
 

Great opportunity to get new blood in that we can grow to love. He’s a sellable asset and we’ve just been relegated, more than halving our income…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sdb said:

****ing hell. We are such an embarrassment of a football club these days. A player of his profile goes for well over £50m, especially with these types of clubs who effectively print money. We are just so, so badly run. When did it just flip to a bunch of imbeciles running lcfc? 

we probably could have got 50m but we would have had to wait till the end of the window giving us no time to rebuild

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sdb said:

****ing hell. We are such an embarrassment of a football club these days. A player of his profile goes for well over £50m. We are just so, so badly run. When did it just flip to a bunch of imbeciles running lcfc? 

We didn't seem to have a lot of buyers for £50m!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Approx. 40m is a decent return for a relegated team I think. About what we could've expected. Blows my mind more that 40m is now considered peanuts and a going transfer of 100m is now considered average, even if true world class talents don't move for that. Transfer market is absolutely bullshit crazy. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of people who want Barnes’ output to go along with elite defensive statistics either have never seen an attacking winger play football or need to seriously adjust their expectations for that position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

we’ve spent some of the madders money on winks, coady and mads. 
I doubt we’ll be spending much of the Barnes money for now.  your wingers/creative midfielders will need to be covered by further sales I think. If we have deals lined up then we may spend ahead of them going through due to the security of the Barnes money being in place 

We will spend a good chunk of it. We'd be fools not to, how else are we going to find the supply of goals otherwise? Maybe we will rely on loan deals but I think we'll bring 3-4 more in across midfield and out wide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If players like Praet, Castagne, Faes buy in to Maresca ball then we will be retaining a lot of quality that looked likely to go.

Im presuming that by playing them all in his first XI for second game running that he sees them playing a part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Viva said:

We didn't seem to have a lot of buyers for £50m!

Keep him then! He'd absolutely walk this league. Christ, he did 5 years ago when he was barely out of nappies. If we're letting players go so vastly under price, why not just pay off the donkeys who graze at Seagrave everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sdb said:

****ing hell. We are such an embarrassment of a football club these days. A player of his profile goes for well over £50m, especially with these types of clubs who effectively print money. We are just so, so badly run. When did it just flip to a bunch of imbeciles running lcfc? 

How many championship clubs get that type of price for their star players? As you need to realise that is where we are now. Yes, £50m+ for a prem player from a prem club. But we are not anymore and the sooner you accept it, the more you will realise actually it's the best we can do in our position 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the best to him, developed into a wonderful player and hope he smashes the champions league.

 

Don't think we can argue with the price, clubs obviously weren't queuing up to pay 45 so 38 is decent enough.

 

Now we need 3 wingers and a cm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sdb said:

Isn't that Lavia from Soton going for £50m odd? What's he done that makes him 20% better than Barnes? I'm so confused by this. 

Well, no he isn't actually. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...