Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
davieG

Stephy Mavididi

By davieG, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

damolcfc

damolcfc

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Verumex said:

How's this guy supposed to be a replacement for Barnes??

 

He doesn't even shoot the ball straight into the keeper's arms every chance he gets...

Makes the excitement of tete look dull 🤪

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sacreblueits442

sacreblueits442

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

Bring back Tete, all is forgiven.

 

I wonder how Tete would get on in the Championship?

 

Hypothetical question

...he would still be doing what he did last season!!!

Holding on to the ball too long, being sent down the line and an inability to beat the player in front of him. So far as he is concerned it seems, going out on loan until he retires still pays well. No worries about making friends, he will not be in a place too long and the fact that he has to be making readjustments every time he signs a new contract is a built-in ready-made answer to his non-performance.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Finnegan

Finnegan

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

Bring back Tete, all is forgiven.

 

I wonder how Tete would get on in the Championship?

 

Hypothetical question

 

I said it the other day but seriously if the best he can get is Celtic, I'd offer him a contract. 

 

He'd do much, much better with Maresca's vision and would be far too good for the Championship. 

 

If his agent seriously can't get him a decent gig in Italy, France, Portugal or Spain though then he needs sacking. Genuinely unbelievable it the best he can manage is going to play pub football for a manager that didn't like him in the first place. Baffling. 

 

Edited by Finnegan
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
fuchsntf

fuchsntf

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Jon the Hat said:

English people often do that.

His granny had Welsh blood & Papa's

Side from Jersey...too near the French coast..The Customs for strange awkward immigrants had to step in..:whistle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ARM1968

ARM1968

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, kingpower said:

From a French ITK journalist close to Montpellier. It appears the hold up is due to the fact Rudkin is proposing to pay £50 per month for the next 200 years in instalments 😆

IMG_0487.jpeg

The Italian way

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted

FFS - is he signing or not?  So it’s perfectly fine for our DoF to have an happy ending, but we are still waiting for ours….

Link to comment
Share on other sites
An Sionnach

An Sionnach

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, sacreblueits442 said:

...he would still be doing what he did last season!!!

Holding on to the ball too long, being sent down the line and an inability to beat the player in front of him. So far as he is concerned it seems, going out on loan until he retires still pays well. No worries about making friends, he will not be in a place too long and the fact that he has to be making readjustments every time he signs a new contract is a built-in ready-made answer to his non-performance.

Less TV in the Championship so the refs are under less close scrutiny. Which probably means a gorilla of a championship full back would eat him alive and get away with it. He should stick to more gentlemanly football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lillehamring

Lillehamring

Posted
Posted

Can't see that there's anything wrong in forcing through a payment structure that benefits us, exactly what chelsea did with Fofana.  The club can't win, they try to be smart and tough, and are balled out for faffing!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Simmo86

Simmo86

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Lillehamring said:

Can't see that there's anything wrong in forcing through a payment structure that benefits us, exactly what chelsea did with Fofana.  The club can't win, they try to be smart and tough, and are balled out for faffing!

When you’re dealing with 6 million euros does it really matter though? More benefit  to having him intergrated into the side and learning his role within the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Spudulike

Spudulike

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Lillehamring said:

Can't see that there's anything wrong in forcing through a payment structure that benefits us, exactly what chelsea did with Fofana.  The club can't win, they try to be smart and tough, and are balled out for faffing!

Haven't heard rumours of any other clubs trying to sign him so Susan and Rudders are in a strong position to haggle. Might be glad they did if he turns out to be a dud. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hitesh

Hitesh

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, urban.spaceman said:

Hope we get that work permit sorted :fc:

 

 

 

Don't worry, he's on a boat from Calais. Only thing is we have to stop him doing a stop in Rwanda first

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lillehamring

Lillehamring

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, Simmo86 said:

When you’re dealing with 6 million euros does it really matter though? More benefit  to having him intergrated into the side and learning his role within the team.

I'm sure when you're on a warning for FFP transgressions, every little bit of clever accounting helps. A day here or there of integration (especially with the team being overseas) might be a small price to pay if it means we can spend a few million extra elsewhere - at this level, that could be an entire player :dunno:  I'm sure it's been well considered and justified.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lillehamring

Lillehamring

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, Spudulike said:

Haven't heard rumours of any other clubs trying to sign him so Susan and Rudders are in a strong position to haggle. Might be glad they did if he turns out to be a dud. 

And yet they'll be slaughtered for jeopardizing our promotion challenge by denying Maresca as much time as possible to work with him!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Simmo86

Simmo86

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Lillehamring said:

I'm sure when you're on a warning for FFP transgressions, every little bit of clever accounting helps. A day here or there of integration (especially with the team being overseas) might be a small price to pay if it means we can spend a few million extra elsewhere - at this level, that could be an entire player :dunno:  I'm sure it's been well considered and justified.

FFP was to do with European football. We’ve just had 80 million in for 2 players. If he was costing 50 million fairplay, try and get best payment structure. 6 million euros, just get him in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lambert09

Lambert09

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Simmo86 said:

FFP was to do with European football. We’ve just had 80 million in for 2 players. If he was costing 50 million fairplay, try and get best payment structure. 6 million euros, just get him in. 

On paper that sounds logical but when you consider the 80m will barely cover a years wage bill ... I dont think we are quite out of the woods because of it, id expect we still have to tread carefully. An extra 2 m upfront might be the difference between us being able to get another good player on loan. 

 

Plus our old party trick of using Maquire to release promised transfer funds early is unlikely possible anymore. 

Edited by Lambert09
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...