Vestergaard

[kingfox]

Thought he deserved a new contract, but three years is very excessive. 
 

Very much in @Ian Nacho camp, thoroughly expected something like a one year contract with option of a second. 
 

If he didn’t want that, then we should’ve cut ties. 

[Leicester_Loyal]

20 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

I suppose with three years on his deal we can sell him next summer 

And when he refuses to go like has happened twice previously?!

 

He won’t even have thoughts of a bigger next contract or international football on his mind this time, he can just sit back and cream it for a further 2 years. 

 

I’d have just about accepted a 2 year deal but 3 is mental. 

[filthyfox]

****...  me.   Jesus Christ.

 

REALLY?

 

Who exactly was to blame for us getting the drop then?  Vesty was SHIT!

 

He was SHIT even before we bought him!

Sent off in a 0-9 thumping.

 

****ing hell

 

This is Rudkin's doing, right?

 

[Finn Claw II]

To give a bit of context a £70m wage bill across 25 players is over £50k each.  
 

that the wage bill of a low- mid ranking team.

if his wages drop in the championship (which they will do, he has shown that he is easily good enough at that level). 

Edited 7 June by Finn Claw II

[Product of 84]

Perhaps we are losing a few of the other CBs we have? 

 

I don't like the third year, but with FFP it means we don't have to buy and if we sell him we make money (I think). It's effectively like signing a free transfer. 

[filthyfox]

In 3 years he will be 34!!!!   ****ingell!

Edited 7 June by filthyfox

[South Shire Fox]

So what happens if the new manager comes in and doesnt rate him? ****ed then 😂

[Jazzy_Jeff]

Haven’t read through all the posts so apologies if this has been missed.

 

If he’s on a lower wage than before and we can sell him next summer - does than not help towards PSR and will it all count as profit as he was out of contract? 

[Lambert09]

58 minutes ago, DezFox said:

Or just don’t resign him. It’s not like he has much power surely? Accept this or don’t resign. We all know it would no big loss. 

yeah of course that’s where the debate falls. But maybe the club don’t want to have to pay 15-20m for a replacement. 

 

Obviously it becomes a bad decision if the new boss just goes with souttar or coady instead. But based on what’s been said, enzo requested this and the agreement was made before he left. 

 

 

 

[don_danbury]

why not 5 year deal like hamza? 

[Fazzer 7]

3 Years is just f  kin mental. Who in their right mind would do that, Rudkin?  Does this club never learn.

Edited 7 June by Fazzer 7

[honeybradger]

3 minutes ago, Jazzy_Jeff said:

Haven’t read through all the posts so apologies if this has been missed.

 

If he’s on a lower wage than before and we can sell him next summer - does than not help towards PSR and will it all count as profit as he was out of contract? 

His wages for 1 year are probably higher than the amount we can sell him for

 

[South Shire Fox]

Anyone think the deal was already signed off before the club knew Enzo was leaving? That can be the only explanation surely

[Gubbins]

Was worried we'd do this when he started to perform last season (at a massively worse level) I can't really add anything to what most others have said. Those last 2 years of contract will most likely just involve him sitting on the bench counting his earnings after we fail to loan him out or sell him. Absolutely insane decision given we've got 4 other cbs and Justin if we get desperate or play 3 at the back. Just gotta pray that whoever the next manager is doesn't play a high defensive line!

[AKCJ]

 **** me. We are beyond stupid.

[Jazzy_Jeff]

2 minutes ago, honeybradger said:

His wages for 1 year are probably higher than the amount we can sell him for

 

If he has a good euros, plays regularly in the PL a club (especially overseas) could pay £10m for 32yr old international 

[foxes_rule1978]

Just now, Jazzy_Jeff said:

If he has a good euros, plays regularly in the PL a club (especially overseas) could pay £10m for 32yr old international 

Would he go though  last time he didn’t 

[Lcfc82]

1 minute ago, South Shire Fox said:

Anyone think the deal was already signed off before the club knew Enzo was leaving? That can be the only explanation surely

He should do the right thing and sign him for Chelsea if it was

[Jazzy_Jeff]

Just now, foxes_rule1978 said:

Would he go though  last time he didn’t 

Because his wife was up the Damien duff 

[Royston.]

Jesus wept. 

 

Lets throw Nacho another 3 while we're at it

 

 

[chapero82]

What a waste of money. They will

never learn! 

[StonyFox]

I suspect this was agreed when Enzo was here, and then he ****ed off. Only announced today due to the embargo ending. 

[Unabomber]

Well funny how they snuck this in after the vardy announcement like we wouldn’t notice 

[CrazyKopCorner]

3 fuching years he’ll be 35! Pleased he showed up last year but he’s likely to be exposed again in the Prem - whoever’s handing out the contracts is a fuching dimwit. I don’t think we need to make 3 guesses as to who it is 

[st albans fox]

31 minutes ago, Leicester_Loyal said:

And when he refuses to go like has happened twice previously?!

 

He won’t even have thoughts of a bigger next contract or international football on his mind this time, he can just sit back and cream it for a further 2 years. 

 

I’d have just about accepted a 2 year deal but 3 is mental. 

He’s getting on - I don’t see him sitting around for two years here when he won’t then get a signing on fee at 35 when this new deal expires