Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Mike1983

Vestergaard

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, filthyfox said:

****...  me.   Jesus Christ.

 

REALLY?

 

Who exactly was to blame for us getting the drop then?  Vesty was SHIT!

 

He was SHIT even before we bought him!

Sent off in a 0-9 thumping.

 

****ing hell

 

This is Rudkin's doing, right?

 

:nigel:

I'm assuming this is for comedic effect? If not where do I start?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, filthyfox said:

****...  me.   Jesus Christ.

 

REALLY?

 

Who exactly was to blame for us getting the drop then?  Vesty was SHIT!

 

He was SHIT even before we bought him!

Sent off in a 0-9 thumping.

 

****ing hell

 

This is Rudkin's doing, right?

 

What 9-0 thumping was he sent off in?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jattdogg said:

Ffs.  1 year extension fine but 3? 

 

 

Depends on the terms. 
 

156 weeks (3 years) x £40k - Total £6,000,000

 

52 weeks (1 year) x £90k - £4,680,000

 

We also spread the costs. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sly said:

Depends on the terms. 
 

156 weeks (3 years) x £40k - Total £6,000,000

 

52 weeks (1 year) x £90k - £4,680,000

 

We also spread the costs. 

 

We’ve been spreading cheeks I think.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, themightyfin said:

Why would he want to sign a 1 year deal?

 

He would walk for nothing abd rhen we have to get a replacement.  

 

Not sure what people were expecting or just moaning for the sake of it.

 

A two year deal !

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cincinnati Fox said:

Idiots.

giving him a 3 year deal in insanity!! They have learnt nothing.

Yeah.

 

Don't let players who are needed in the squad walk away for nothing and get them tied down on more realistic contracts hopefully. 

 

What's the alternative?.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, themightyfin said:

Yeah.

 

Don't let players who are needed in the squad walk away for nothing and get them tied down on more realistic contracts hopefully. 

 

What's the alternative?.

 

One year - agree, not acceptable.

Three years - one year too many

Two years - Perfect. No one would complain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

One year - agree, not acceptable.

Three years - one year too many

Two years - Perfect. No one would complain.

Ok so your not happy about one years difference? Not the worst thing in the world then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...