Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Trelleh

EFL Officiating Abomination Journal 23/24

Recommended Posts

1st goal was clearly onside. 
Don’t know where all these pen/handball claims are coming from. 
What/where are the red cards people are claiming? 
 

the things he did get wrong were: not enough yellows for Boro, not enough time added on at the end. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Les-TA-Jon said:

1st goal was clearly onside. 
Don’t know where all these pen/handball claims are coming from. 
What/where are the red cards people are claiming? 
 

the things he did get wrong were: not enough yellows for Boro, not enough time added on at the end. 

Clarke chopping down Ricardo, getting booked, then doing the exact same, right down to the blade of grass it was on, on Praet 15 minutes later. Clarke was also the one who basically caught it to take it away from McAteer when we were chasing a first goal 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Doctor said:

Clarke chopping down Ricardo, getting booked, then doing the exact same, right down to the blade of grass it was on, on Praet 15 minutes later. Clarke was also the one who basically caught it to take it away from McAteer when we were chasing a first goal 

It wasn't Clarke who got booked in the first half apparently. Comms made a mistake.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Les-TA-Jon said:

1st goal was clearly onside. 
Don’t know where all these pen/handball claims are coming from. 
What/where are the red cards people are claiming? 
 

the things he did get wrong were: not enough yellows for Boro, not enough time added on at the end. 

Second half. The ball has bounced and hit their 5’s hand. It’s a penalty. I was right in line with it. The red card. Same suspect. Booked in the first 5 minutes. Then not booked ten minutes later for the exact same foul. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bert said:

Second half. The ball has bounced and hit their 5’s hand. It’s a penalty. I was right in line with it. The red card. Same suspect. Booked in the first 5 minutes. Then not booked ten minutes later for the exact same foul. 

Maybe it was a different incident but with the benefit of replays it never hit his hand

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bert said:

Second half. The ball has bounced and hit their 5’s hand. It’s a penalty. I was right in line with it. The red card. Same suspect. Booked in the first 5 minutes. Then not booked ten minutes later for the exact same foul. 

Those bouncing onto someone's hand penalties are only ever really given after a VAR review.

 

Referee wasn't brilliant but in no way responsible for that shower we've just presented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LCFC-92 said:

Those bouncing onto someone's hand penalties are only ever really given after a VAR review.

 

Referee wasn't brilliant but in no way responsible for that shower we've just presented.

So, referees aren't competent enough to give decisions correctly without help then? Not like it was from a corner with a blocked sight line, it was out towards the side of the box

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Les-TA-Jon said:

No. It was another player who neither scored or assisted

The fact he wasn't involved in the goal is irrelevant? If Kasey headbutts their defender at the before Vardy scores, goal would be ruled out. 

 

JJ's tripped and good chance he makes it back to defend the goal. 

 

 

Edited by UniFox21
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Bert said:

He was woeful. Unsurprisingly. Arrogant as usual. How their centre half didn’t get sent off after being booked for the same tackle he actually got booked for was a shambles. Missed a hand ball in the second half which should’ve been a pen. Then to only add on 4 minutes. After 8 subs and countless time wasting. Embarassing. He hates us. Always has 

Wasn't hand ball.

 

Still a sh!te ref though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Les-TA-Jon said:

1st goal was clearly onside. 
Don’t know where all these pen/handball claims are coming from. 
What/where are the red cards people are claiming? 
 

the things he did get wrong were: not enough yellows for Boro, not enough time added on at the end. 

 

3 minutes ago, Nod.E said:

Wasn't hand ball.

 

Still a sh!te ref though.

Looked like a hand ball from SK4. Haven’t watched back though on tv

Edited by phoneticerror
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kavanaugh is terrible. Spent the second half pointing out to my little boy that he’s the reason he should want to brush his teeth. Imagine getting a yellow card off that stinky mouth. Gross

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nod.E said:

Wasn't hand ball.

 

Still a sh!te ref though.

His arm was outside of his silhouette and moved towards the ball, nearest player was McAteer like two yards away, not sure how you can claim it's not handball when it's not accidental and hits his hand

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...