Popular Post pkonline Posted 28 May Popular Post Share Posted 28 May Giving a relatively unproven manager 5 years just shows how incompetent Chelsea are! 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st albans fox Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May (edited) 11 minutes ago, Chelmofox said: 5 years pay when he gets sacked. Crazy deal, but fair play to his team for negotiating. Even if you get top 4 at Chelsea you get the sack. No way the ever see a 5 year deal out! Saw that he’s only earning £100k/week he’ll be by far the lowest earning big six coach the length of the deal gives him some security for when he’s discarded and gives Chelsea the ability to increase his remuneration if he performs well. It’s an indicator that they want the project with him to work and it’s long term but it doesn’t commit Chelsea to paying a fortune if/when he gets sacked. clubs v rarely end up paying off a manager’s contract unless they never take a new job. (Unless you’re Lcfc ) Edited 28 May by st albans fox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RowlattsFox Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May It's not completely out of the question that he goes to Chelsea and does well. In an ideal world he has some great ideas and better players make it work. I've enjoyed Fatawu, Mavididi and KDH but he's not got the likes of Palmer to work with. Don't think they really have the Winks role covered, Enzo would wish they still had Jorginho for that role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woody1962 Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May What's everyone's thoughts on the bookies choices? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goose2010 Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May Just now, Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot said: 5 year deal, Christ. So what is the thinking behind that? They’re going to back him come hell or high water over the next few years, even if they have a few stinkers of a season? Doesn’t seem Chelsea’s M.O. When was the last time they offered a manager a 5 year deal? They havent. Ever! not even with some of their greats. Maybe we have dodged a bullet as i imagine we would have tried to match his offer in some form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
when_you're_smiling Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May Hopefully the compensation includes one of their hotels so we can avoid PSR. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxes_rule1978 Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May 2 minutes ago, Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot said: 5 year deal, Christ. So what is the thinking behind that? They’re going to back him come hell or high water over the next few years, even if they have a few stinkers of a season? Doesn’t seem Chelsea’s M.O. When was the last time they offered a manager a 5 year deal? No chance they actually let a manager have time and grow the team. Chelsea are about instant success… if you are t getting that you are out. Sometimes you could have done a good job there and still get sacked. It’s a poison chalice, and potter hasn’t found it easy since getting the chop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the draper Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May Not sad at all Good luck to him To be honest I like many others wanted him gone when he was destroying our run in He isn't a manager for a relegation scrap and that's what we need now David Moyes will do for me 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HankMarvin Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May 12 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said: People get less time for involuntary manslaughter 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARTY_FOX Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May I'm just shocked they didn't go for the best manager in the league and poach farke tbh. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozleicester Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May Chelsea in 2028 are going to be compltely broke... theyve got longer loans/costs than my mortgage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May 1 minute ago, foxes_rule1978 said: No chance they actually let a manager have time and grow the team. Chelsea are about instant success… if you are t getting that you are out. Sometimes you could have done a good job there and still get sacked. It’s a poison chalice, and potter hasn’t found it easy since getting the chop That’s why I’m trying to work out what makes sense with the 5 year deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxes_rule1978 Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May 2 minutes ago, Woody1962 said: What's everyone's thoughts on the bookies choices? Those options aren’t looking too bad at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SecretPro Posted 28 May Author Share Posted 28 May 3 minutes ago, Woody1962 said: What's everyone's thoughts on the bookies choices? Not a bad list tbf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post StriderHiryu Posted 28 May Popular Post Share Posted 28 May 1 minute ago, ARTY_FOX said: I'm just shocked they didn't go for the best manager in the league and poach farke tbh. Not making this up, but I saw a Leeds fan channel bemoaning that Cheslea were interested in McKenna and Maresca but NOT interested in THEIR manager. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chelmofox Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May 3 minutes ago, Woody1962 said: What's everyone's thoughts on the bookies choices? 1st one please. Skip 3, 4, 5. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HankMarvin Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May 4 minutes ago, st albans fox said: Saw that he’s only earning £100k/week he’ll be by far the lowest earning big six coach the length of the deal gives him some security for when he’s discarded and gives Chelsea the ability to increase his remuneration if he performs well. It’s an indicator that they want the project with him to work and it’s long term but it doesn’t commit Chelsea to paying a fortune if/when he gets sacked. clubs v rarely end up paying off a manager’s contract unless they never take a new job. (Unless you’re Lcfc ) If you were his agent why would you agree to be paid lower than the last 3 Chelsea managers and the same as Sean Dyche? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StriderHiryu Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May 1 minute ago, Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot said: That’s why I’m trying to work out what makes sense with the 5 year deal? MAYBE it's so they can divide the wages over a longer period of time. They are Amortisation FC after all. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claridge Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May Can't believe we can get money for the one trick pony, Great squad last year and nearly ****ed it up. Delighted he is going Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fazzyfox Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May Asking Chelsea to show respect . The club that encourage under contract players to phone in to their clubs sick and meet them for talks instead of training. The club who turned up for a Cup Final against us in Chavy shell suits as if they were hanging out at a shopping centre for the afternoon. The club who targeted Ricardo's knee in order to provoke a ruck close enough to the bench to get to substitute Amartey (who OK was a little disrespectful to them a few days earlier). The club who cynically took out De-Bruyne in the Champions League Final, the club who....................................................etc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElusiveEd Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May Hands up, who's second result check next season, after our own, is going to be the Chelsea one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lad1966 Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May Good luck to him. He’s a good manager when his teams are playing well. He struggles with changing outcomes of games, where things aren’t going to plan. We just need to look at the use of substitutions. Granted he will better player and a larger squad to play with, but i don’t see him taking a calculated/ necessary risk to win a game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trooky Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May Just now, fazzyfox said: Asking Chelsea to show respect . The club that encourage under contract players to phone in to their clubs sick and meet them for talks instead of training. The club who turned up for a Cup Final against us in Chavy shell suits as if they were hanging out at a shopping centre for the afternoon. The club who targeted Ricardo's knee in order to provoke a ruck close enough to the bench to get to substitute Amartey (who OK was a little disrespectful to them a few days earlier). The club who cynically took out De-Bruyne in the Champions League Final, the club who....................................................etc Vile club with absolutely no class 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitchandro Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May 47 minutes ago, MPH said: They'll qualify for the champions league and so many people will have egg on their faces. remember this post and feel free to remind me about it if im wrong. Not sure why people would have egg in their faces. Villa finished 4th this season so he’s not got to beat a lot. If he does well at Chelsea it doesn’t change the fact that he’d struggle to implement his style of football with inferior players relative to the division. I’m not confident he’d have kept us up, but having better players does tend to make you look a better manager. Still, he did the job here and I’ve nothing against him. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goose2010 Posted 28 May Share Posted 28 May 6 minutes ago, foxes_rule1978 said: Those options aren’t looking too bad at all thought the same, wouldn't mind any of them to be honest. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts