Pliskin Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May The stall is likely down to Chelsea trying to low ball us. Susan we know drives a hard bargain, so we won’t budge until they pay what we want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chelmofox Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May Just now, Pliskin said: The stall is likely down to Chelsea trying to low ball us. Susan we know drives a hard bargain, so we won’t budge until they pay what we want. Funny if they are trying. Chelsea’s tactic is to get everything announced asap and get heads turned early (see Fofana or that shit one they paid 100m from Brighton). We should definitely dig our heels in here as the6 are asset stripping the playing staff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxinsocks Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May Just now, Chelmofox said: Funny if they are trying. Chelsea’s tactic is to get everything announced asap and get heads turned early (see Fofana or that shit one they paid 100m from Brighton). We should definitely dig our heels in here as the6 are asset stripping the playing staff. I presume that until deal is done then enzo is reminded of his duty of care to lcfc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chelmofox Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May Just now, foxinsocks said: I presume that until deal is done then enzo is reminded of his duty of care to lcfc Yeah. I'm sure that any thoughts of 'duty of care' has gone on the 'give any f4*ks pile' already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxinsocks Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May Just now, Chelmofox said: Yeah. I'm sure that any thoughts of 'duty of care' has gone on the 'give any f4*ks pile' already. Let's take him on a trip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pliskin Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May (edited) 8 minutes ago, Chelmofox said: Funny if they are trying. Chelsea’s tactic is to get everything announced asap and get heads turned early (see Fofana or that shit one they paid 100m from Brighton). We should definitely dig our heels in here as the6 are asset stripping the playing staff. It will be the backroom staff that will stall it. We cant let them pay £10m to strip our entire backroom staff. So I imagine Susan will be tightening the vice to ensure we get maximum £££. I’m sure all is which will aid FFP. People think the FFP and PRS issues will weaken us, they won’t, they will probably make us more ruthless with deals, especially outgoing! Edited 30 May by Pliskin 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HybridFox Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May Compensation is peanuts for them compared to what they waste on squad players. Every right we should hold out although hopefully not to the extent it lasts all summer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nolucklcfc Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May Got to be today. The Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy G Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May The more this drags on the more money we will be extracting from Chelsea. It's good news if anything, negative PR for Chelsea the more it drags on and neutral for us, with a financial upside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Falling Foxes Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May All the players in recent years, now the manager and back room staff. Perhaps even more players....... They are really making us pay for Hazard's goal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post goose2010 Posted 30 May Popular Post Share Posted 30 May 3 minutes ago, Free Falling Foxes said: All the players in recent years, now the manager and back room staff. Perhaps even more players....... They are really making us pay for Hazard's goal. To be fair only Kante worked out for them. Drinkwater, chillwell and Fofana haven't exactly pushed on, not like you could sell either for a profit. We have took them for close to 200m and it's not improved them in the long run. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Falling Foxes Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May 1 minute ago, goose2010 said: To be fair only Kante worked out for them. Drinkwater, chillwell and Fofana haven't exactly pushed on, not like you could sell either for a profit. We have took them for close to 200m and it's not improved them in the long run. My point was flippant. However, those players were outstanding for us so Chelsea taking them did affect us and helped prevent our continued upsetting of the top six. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Lesta2014 Posted 30 May Popular Post Share Posted 30 May 12 minutes ago, goose2010 said: To be fair only Kante worked out for them. Drinkwater, chillwell and Fofana haven't exactly pushed on, not like you could sell either for a profit. We have took them for close to 200m and it's not improved them in the long run. Worryingly that 200m hasn’t improved us in the long run either. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Sol thewall Bamba Posted 30 May Popular Post Share Posted 30 May 26 minutes ago, Free Falling Foxes said: All the players in recent years, now the manager and back room staff. Perhaps even more players....... They are really making us pay for Hazard's goal. Chelsea didn't win us the league 👍 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indierich06 Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May To be fair, let it drag on, start the search and negotiations for his replacement in the background. He's definitely going, they just need to agree on a fee - we should rinse them for as much as we can. No reason it stops us from doing what we need to do. Although I suppose this is Leicester we're talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox92 Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May Just read Chelsea have to sell first. Cant wait for his moaning in January when they can't sign anyone. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death by Football Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May I’d love to think that Rudkin is working magic in the background to bring in a replacement immediately Enzo walks out the door. I’d love to think that… 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urban fox Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May Chelsea will of course try to low ball us. They are in psr trouble themselves so will be trying to string any payments out until after june Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozvaldo Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May Imagine if Susan plays ****-off hard ball, wanting the £10m + whatever we want for the rest of the coaching staff up front... to the point where Chelsea can't make it happen within the PSR parameters, and he ends up staying. Scenes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Itsthejoeker Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May 1 hour ago, Chelmofox said: Yeah. I'm sure that any thoughts of 'duty of care' has gone on the 'give any f4*ks pile' already. They’ve been in there since the Preston game tbf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian__marshall Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May 9 hours ago, Happy Fox said: Cheers Enzo https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-13473425/Enzo-Marescas-eight-man-backroom-staff-Chelsea-including-ex-Blues-goalkeeper-No-2-new-set-piece-coach-lured-Premier-League-rival.html I take it that the delay is due to Boehly negotiating with Top how much compensation they need to pay for Rudkin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitchandro Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May 53 minutes ago, Free Falling Foxes said: My point was flippant. However, those players were outstanding for us so Chelsea taking them did affect us and helped prevent our continued upsetting of the top six. Chilwell was an average defender and couldn’t even pass forwards, we knew we were rinsing them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmayne7 Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May 52 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said: Chelsea didn't win us the league 👍 Such an annoying narrative. We were miles clear at that point so even if they hadn't drawn with Spurs, it was still well within our control. In that interview with Kasper, I'm sure Gary L called Hazard a Leicester legend or something like that. If anything, he denied us the joy of winning it ourselves. Though I suppose that means we wouldn't have had that incredible day at KP for everyone who was there, but selfishly, I was on my own when we won the league and wasn't with my old man so didn't get to share the same joy as others, not living anywhere near Leicester 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
volpeazzurro Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May 55 minutes ago, ozvaldo said: Imagine if Susan plays ****-off hard ball, wanting the £10m + whatever we want for the rest of the coaching staff up front... to the point where Chelsea can't make it happen within the PSR parameters, and he ends up staying. Scenes. I think the whole saga is totally made up because there's not a hint of anything happening on the club site and they always keep us informed! 🤔 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityfanlee23 Posted 30 May Share Posted 30 May (edited) This being dragged out doesn’t really affect us unless it goes on right into pre season. I feel like we will likely have to wait until the points deductions are announced before we get the manager we want. I can’t see a serious manager like Potter taking us on without knowing what deductions we are facing. Unless it’s a young manager like Corberan who would be willing to go down with us and build a project in the Championship I think we need to hold our lines. Edited 30 May by cityfanlee23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts