Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Trav Le Bleu

Also In The News - part 3

By Trav Le Bleu, in General Chat

Recommended Posts

Daggers

Daggers

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, StanSP said:

20240624_142944.thumb.jpg.3ae4bf30ca4f8c04d4fff00f2a69dd16.jpg

 

20240624_142936.thumb.jpg.d058616cb3cb9e752166163af45fceb9.jpg

 

20240624_142912.thumb.jpg.04e25b6e096900df0de6e4f1e9e3de3d.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

For shame that you didn’t include the potential mountain-top based shark attack, my particular favourite.

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
foxy boxing

foxy boxing

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Wymsey said:

It might just be me that feels that Lucy Letby may well not have killed any baby at all; and just that Consultants etc. are blaming her for care failings?..

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0dddgn9leyo

 

How do you explain the scribbled notes found at her home with the words "am I evil" on them and other evidence!.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Dunge

Dunge

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
18 minutes ago, Wymsey said:

It might just be me that feels that Lucy Letby may well not have killed any baby at all; and just that Consultants etc. are blaming her for care failings?..

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0dddgn9leyo

 

The most compelling thing that she didn’t do it is that she doesn’t look the sort.

 

The most compelling thing that she did do it is all the evidence.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
FoxesDeb

FoxesDeb

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Wymsey said:

It might just be me that feels that Lucy Letby may well not have killed any baby at all; and just that Consultants etc. are blaming her for care failings?..

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0dddgn9leyo

 

 

Put everything together it definitely points towards her, but the fact there is no 'actual' evidence, at least that I remember, means there is still room for doubt, and is one of the main reasons I don't agree with the death penalty. 

 

Without any actual proof she may well be innocent, it seems unlikely, but it's possible. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Daggers

Daggers

Posted
Posted

"I killed them on purpose because I'm not good enough"

 

"I am a horrible evil person"

 

"I am evil I did this"

 

To be fair, I can see how those words written in her own hand could be taken more than one way.

 

 

letby_note.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
FoxesDeb

FoxesDeb

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, Daggers said:

"I killed them on purpose because I'm not good enough"

 

"I am a horrible evil person"

 

"I am evil I did this"

 

To be fair, I can see how those words written in her own hand could be taken more than one way.

 

 

letby_note.jpeg

That note also says 'I haven't done anything wrong'

 

Or are we just choosing which bits to believe?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Daggers

Daggers

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, FoxesDeb said:

That note also says 'I haven't done anything wrong'

 

Or are we just choosing which bits to believe?

I don't know, are you? I can't speak for anyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FoxesDeb

FoxesDeb

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Daggers said:

I don't know, are you? I can't speak for anyone else.

We as in the British public, her peers who convicted her on circumstantial evidence, the note being a key part of said evidence.

 

If your post meant anything other than sarcasm that people might not think the sentences you have picked out to be the truth, I'll be very surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Daggers

Daggers

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, FoxesDeb said:

We as in the British public, her peers who convicted her on circumstantial evidence, the note being a key part of said evidence.

 

If your post meant anything other than sarcasm that people might not think the sentences you have picked out to be the truth, I'll be very surprised.

The jury debated the evidence and found her guilty BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT.

 

Until anyone ponies up new evidence to the contrary, I'm not entertaining notions that she might be innocent anymore than I'm considering there is extraterrestrial life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Trav Le Bleu

Trav Le Bleu

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 hours ago, FoxesDeb said:

 

Put everything together it definitely points towards her, but the fact there is no 'actual' evidence, at least that I remember, means there is still room for doubt, and is one of the main reasons I don't agree with the death penalty. 

 

Without any actual proof she may well be innocent, it seems unlikely, but it's possible. 

Yeah, it's not impossible that all these things were happening on her watch and she saw that connection and started blaming herself.

 

Maybe someone who was more to blame psychologically manipulated her and convinced her it was her fault.

 

Maybe it was just plain incompetence that she couldn't bring herself to admit to publicly, but harboured deep self-loathing at her cowardice to admit it (which would be manslaughter?)

 

All highly unlikely, but not impossible. So you're quite right about the death sentence, which can never be rescinded.

 

I've sat on a couple of juries (coroners and criminal) and on one (don't expect any details) there was one guy in the jury who from the get go was full on torch and pitchfork lynch mob, despite 11 other people deciding that any evidence was tenuous at best and the prosecution made very little sense, and yet he remained so through the whole trial.

 

Which has always made me very aware how differently people can see stuff.

 

 

Oh, and btw ... the lynch mob guy wasn't me lol

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Daggers

Daggers

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Trav Le Bleu said:

Yeah, it's not impossible that all these things were happening on her watch and she saw that connection and started blaming herself.

 

Maybe someone who was more to blame psychologically manipulated her and convinced her it was her fault.

 

Maybe it was just plain incompetence that she couldn't bring herself to admit to publicly, but harboured deep self-loathing at her cowardice to admit it (which would be manslaughter?)

 

All highly unlikely, but not impossible. So you're quite right about the death sentence, which can never be rescinded.

 

I've sat on a couple of juries (coroners and criminal) and on one (don't expect any details) there was one guy in the jury who from the get go was full on torch and pitchfork lynch mob, despite 11 other people deciding that any evidence was tenuous at best and the prosecution made very little sense, and yet he remained so through the whole trial.

 

Which has always made me very aware how differently people can see stuff.

 

 

Oh, and btw ... the lynch mob guy wasn't me lol

 

I still say we should have returned a guilty verdict and recommended death by tickling. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...