Dr The Singh Posted 24 January Share Posted 24 January 2 hours ago, Trav Le Bleu said: Being a swinger with one friend isn't much fun. Better than no friends 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr The Singh Posted 24 January Share Posted 24 January 9 hours ago, Torquay Gunner said: They could both pass for men or women. Thats what makes them exciting 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parafox Posted 24 January Share Posted 24 January 1 minute ago, Dr The Singh said: What do you mean has, im in bed with right now and every monday, wednesdays and thursdays. So you missed the Ipswich game, then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr The Singh Posted 24 January Share Posted 24 January 1 hour ago, Parafox said: So you missed the Ipswich game, then? I went for the thing that had the most action, and the Ipswich game was defo not that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samlcfc Posted 24 January Share Posted 24 January (edited) On 23/01/2024 at 14:23, MPH said: He won't. He's gone on record as saying that he will use the time to prepare his successor to take over. It would take a constitutional amendment to change this and that would require at least 50% of the Democratic vote ( 75% of the total house) and this wont EVER happen I've taken a bit of a step back from politics in recent months, but last time around he didn't seem to stop pushing boundaries once he had the ball rolling. It feels somewhat wild that he's in the position to give it another crack after what appears to be at best reckless behaviour during the 2020 election. Will be interesting to see how that story plays out over time. In some respects, with him moving towards being the Republican nomination, such behaviour is at least not a disqualifying factor for being president amongst enough of the US populace at this point in time. I don't think I'd suggest he could overcome what you have stated, although I do wonder if in the vein of 'preparing a successor', he might endorse someone like his Son or some other qualifying crony. Would it be possible for him to be Vice President beyond 2024? Edited 24 January by samlcfc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parafox Posted 24 January Share Posted 24 January 2 hours ago, Dr The Singh said: I went for the thing that had the most action, and the Ipswich game was defo not that. Well I know what you'll be doing on Saturday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPH Posted 25 January Share Posted 25 January (edited) 28 minutes ago, samlcfc said: I've taken a bit of a step back from politics in recent months, but last time around he didn't seem to stop pushing boundaries once he had the ball rolling. It feels somewhat wild that he's in the position to give it another crack after what appears to be at best reckless behaviour during the 2020 election. Will be interesting to see how that story plays out over time. In some respects, with him moving towards being the Republican nomination, such behaviour is at least not a disqualifying factor for being president amongst enough of the US populace at this point in time. I don't think I'd suggest he could overcome what you have stated, although I do wonder if in the vein of 'preparing a successor', he might endorse someone like his Son or some other qualifying crony. Would it be possible for him to be Vice President beyond 2024? The 12th Amendment, which was ratified in 1804, directs that no one “ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice President of the United States.” The 22nd Amendment states that “[n]o person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice." it does mean a president who has served two terms couldn’t possibly be selected as a running mate. Edited 25 January by MPH 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samlcfc Posted 25 January Share Posted 25 January (edited) 9 minutes ago, MPH said: The 12th Amendment, which was ratified in 1804, directs that no one “ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice President of the United States.” The 22nd Amendment states that “[n]o person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice." it does mean a president who has served two terms couldn’t possibly be selected as a running mate. Thanks! I suppose for now, any potential influence he has beyond this election just provides an interesting discussion for most of us. We seem positioned for a fairly lively 4 years whoever gets the office. Edited 25 January by samlcfc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPH Posted 25 January Share Posted 25 January 7 minutes ago, samlcfc said: Thanks! I suppose for now, any potential influence he has beyond this election just provides an interesting discussion for most of us. We seem positioned for a fairly lively 4 years whoever gets the office. if we can just survive the next 4 years…. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daggers Posted 25 January Share Posted 25 January Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaaaa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon the Hat Posted 25 January Share Posted 25 January 15 minutes ago, Daggers said: Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaaaa Nadine Dorries had a talk show? Must have started after I left. Did she actually resign as an MP yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Daggers Posted 25 January Popular Post Share Posted 25 January Cracking cover design 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zear0 Posted 25 January Share Posted 25 January 6 minutes ago, Daggers said: Cracking cover design More bloody TDS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daggers Posted 25 January Share Posted 25 January So, she didn’t get a stiff sentence and avoided doing hard time 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest David Oldfields Gate Posted 25 January Share Posted 25 January 8 hours ago, Daggers said: Cracking cover design Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Daggers Posted 25 January Popular Post Share Posted 25 January 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bovril Posted 25 January Share Posted 25 January 9 hours ago, Daggers said: Cracking cover design 35 minutes ago, David Oldfields Gate said: The long 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Hankey Posted 25 January Share Posted 25 January 1 hour ago, Daggers said: Haven't we got a 'Fake News' topic on this forum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jattdogg Posted 25 January Share Posted 25 January 2 hours ago, Daggers said: So, she didn’t get a stiff sentence and avoided doing hard time She can stand with her head erect after holding firm to her innocence. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parafox Posted 25 January Share Posted 25 January 2 hours ago, Daggers said: So, she didn’t get a stiff sentence and avoided doing hard time It begs the question as to how her colleagues became suspicious. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trav Le Bleu Posted 25 January Author Share Posted 25 January 5 hours ago, Daggers said: So, she didn’t get a stiff sentence and avoided doing hard time Not sure I swallow that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trav Le Bleu Posted 25 January Author Share Posted 25 January 3 hours ago, Parafox said: It begs the question as to how her colleagues became suspicious. They are upright citizens. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trav Le Bleu Posted 25 January Author Share Posted 25 January Foreign Delivery Driver Saves Man After Explosion in Leicester Probably get deported to Rwanda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wymsey Posted 26 January Share Posted 26 January https://news.sky.com/story/donald-trump-storms-out-of-court-during-closing-arguments-in-damages-trial-13056860 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parafox Posted 26 January Share Posted 26 January (edited) 2 hours ago, Wymsey said: https://news.sky.com/story/donald-trump-storms-out-of-court-during-closing-arguments-in-damages-trial-13056860 I'm not defending this obnoxious human being, but the "storms out of court" is a bit exaggerated, purposely of course. What the court record shows is that "Mr Trump rose and left the courtroom" rather than "storming out" which suggests throwing a tantrum, kicking his chair over and slamming a few doors after shouting expletives at the prosecution. Edited 26 January by Parafox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts