Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Ric Flair

Stefano Sensi

Recommended Posts

Reading more into this, seems to be that Inter want a mandatory future fee after the loan, and we want optional based on us getting promoted.

 

Sensi will be on big wages for a championship side, so is prudent of us to insist on the option.

 

Hope we have a simple loan for someone else in the background if this doesn't happen.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be that Inter started dicking around trying to amend the deal last minute and whilst we were negotiating that, started sounding out alternatives and stumbled on something better. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally think Inter are taking the royal P*ss.

 

Sensi is someone they aren’t using and is on 80K a week there. His contract expires in the summer and he has been plagued with Injury issues while being in Milan. 
 

Quite frankly they are lucky to be getting Transfer fees offered for him.

 

If it’s true they want a loan fee AS WELL AS another fee upon promotion (despite him being out of contract and them not receiving ANY other concrete offers) then that really is unreal.

 

We give them 500K-1m and they save 1.5m in wages on top of that. That, for a player who isn’t featuring is a very good offer.

 

They are playing on our desperation following the weird exit of Cesare. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Pita said:

If the rumour figure of £2 mill for sensi are true and we can’t afford him Leicester must be in very big trouble. 

We've just lost something silly like 2/3 of our revenue due to relegation.

Edited by Beechey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Pita said:

If the rumour figure of £2 mill for sensi are true and we can’t afford him Leicester must be in very big trouble. 


Personally, I wouldn’t want to be paying £2 million for someone who can’t get a game at the club he’s at, has a suspect injury record, is on a high wage and is out of contract in the summer.

 

And I’d certainly be even less willing to do that if the selling club had held onto him for a couple more weeks, taking him all the way to Dubai and back just to sit on the bench.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Scotch said:

Could be that Inter started dicking around trying to amend the deal last minute and whilst we were negotiating that, started sounding out alternatives and stumbled on something better. 

It’s the hope that kills you

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we have these theories (with these chances of being true).  Am I missing anything?

 

- LCFC too skint to make deal happen without moving unsaleable deadwood (45% probability)

- Inter taking the piss demanding a sell-on on a player out of contract (40%)

- Rudkin still wasted after a 3 day blinder in Thailand (4.99%)

- LCFC sharpening the deal to take advantage of Inter’s weak position (0.01%)

Edited by KingsX
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...