Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Foxes96

Other Teams Transfers - Summer 2024

By Foxes96, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

DJ Barry Hammond

DJ Barry Hammond

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, CloudFox said:

This seems like such a strange move. Sideways at best, surely?


5 year deal for the player, that takes him to 33/34.
 

And if you don’t sign someone for £30 million without a comparably expensive weekly wage so, it’s a retirement deal that can’t really be refused by Andersen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lambert09

Lambert09

Posted
Posted

Broja to ipswich in a strange deal. Obligation in place but broja hasn’t agreed the deal, so if they stay up he can still say no to them, or them just low ball him to get out of it. 
 

Daft from chelsea really. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dmayne7

dmayne7

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Lambert09 said:

Broja to ipswich in a strange deal. Obligation in place but broja hasn’t agreed the deal, so if they stay up he can still say no to them, or them just low ball him to get out of it. 
 

Daft from chelsea really. 

So it won't actually be an obligation, rather an option to buy. But journalists are reporting that as an obligation; can't beat football journalists for their intelligence lol

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
shen

shen

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CloudFox said:

This seems like such a strange move. Sideways at best, surely?

Payrise and sign-on I presume. But yes, difficult to argue otherwise.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
fkas

fkas

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, shen said:

Payrise and sign-on I presume. But yes, difficult to argue otherwise.

Signing on fee, pay rise, security of a long term contract and won't have to move house, change the kids school etc. No life admin required. Still playing Premiership football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Phenom

Phenom

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Lambert09 said:

Broja to ipswich in a strange deal. Obligation in place but broja hasn’t agreed the deal, so if they stay up he can still say no to them, or them just low ball him to get out of it. 
 

Daft from chelsea really. 

Where did you hear that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Super_horns

Super_horns

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, dmayne7 said:

So it won't actually be an obligation, rather an option to buy. But journalists are reporting that as an obligation; can't beat football journalists for their intelligence lol

Must be a clause or two in it saying if he is rubbish but they stay up Ipswich don't have to sign him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MGLCFC

MGLCFC

Posted
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Super_horns said:

Must be a clause or two in it saying if he is rubbish but they stay up Ipswich don't have to sign him?

Wouldn't that mean the deal would just be an option to buy - similar to what most Italian clubs choose, then don't bother pursuing it or try to knock down the transfer fee? 

Edited by MGLCFC
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pmcla26

pmcla26

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, FrankieADZ said:

if this stop ayew moving then im all for it

Palace are going to be crap this season, Guehi and Anderson will both need replacing and surely means Eze will push for a move late in the window now. 

 

Olise, Guehi, Anderson and Eze all in one window. Wow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Super_horns

Super_horns

Posted
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, MGLCFC said:

Wouldn't that mean the deal would just be an option to buy - similar to what most Italian clubs choose, then don't bother pursuing it or try to knock down the transfer fee? 

Yes guess so.

 

Maybe the media have it wrong.

 

22 minutes ago, pmcla26 said:

Palace are going to be crap this season, Guehi and Anderson will both need replacing and surely means Eze will push for a move late in the window now. 

 

Olise, Guehi, Anderson and Eze all in one window. Wow. 

Been linked with a few but you'd think they would want to to be certain of getting them first.

 

Ipswich got 3 players on loan now - presume one will have to miss out in the match day squad as you are only allowed 2 apparently.

 

They are:
- Premier League clubs may not register more than two players on loan at any one time.
- The maximum number of loans registrable in the same season is four, and, under no circumstances, shall more than one be from the same club at any one time.
- Premier League clubs cannot loan to another Premier League club a player they have acquired in the same transfer window.
- A Premier League club may loan not more than one of its goalkeepers to another Premier League club.

Edited by Super_horns
Link to comment
Share on other sites
-sodapop

-sodapop

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, fox_favourite said:

Screenshot_20240821-085342.png

 

Football is truly broken 

The crazy thing is, as far as I can tell this is so that Atletico Madrid has the money to sign Gallagher; which because he's homegrown makes this deal worthwhile for them balancing their books. Disgusting club, I really wish nothing but the worst for them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
goose2010

goose2010

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, fox_favourite said:

Screenshot_20240821-085342.png

 

Football is truly broken 

Saw a stat today that they have 191 years of contracts and their books within the playing squad. The second in that list is Spurs on 97! 

 

It is utterly ridiculous

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MGLCFC

MGLCFC

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, goose2010 said:

Saw a stat today that they have 191 years of contracts and their books within the playing squad. The second in that list is Spurs on 97! 

 

That will probably equate to over £1 billion in wages - How do they get away with it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FrankieADZ

FrankieADZ

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, pmcla26 said:

Palace are going to be crap this season, Guehi and Anderson will both need replacing and surely means Eze will push for a move late in the window now. 

 

Olise, Guehi, Anderson and Eze all in one window. Wow. 

yes and no, i dont think Newcastle will pay over £70mil for Guehi and Eze's release clause fee has now passed, i cant imagine anyone paying over £70mil each for them too

Link to comment
Share on other sites
slymunn

slymunn

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, FrankieADZ said:

yes and no, i dont think Newcastle will pay over £70mil for Guehi and Eze's release clause fee has now passed, i cant imagine anyone paying over £70mil each for them too

Man City may pay 70mil for Eze, using the Alvarez money. They was linked with him at the end of last week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Samilktray

Samilktray

Posted
Posted
Just now, StanSP said:

I can't fathom Andersen moving to Fulham. 

 

And where do Fulham get their money from? 3 big signings - ESR, Andersen and Berge. 

The bloke who owns them is the guy who owns the wrestling or something, must be fairly wealthy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...