Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Nolucklcfc

Oliver Skipp - confirmed official

Recommended Posts

Just now, South Shire Fox said:

Why? I wouldnt of thought Brighton would loan him to us to sit on our bench when he played almost 30 times for them last season

He will get more game time here than at Brighton I reckon, but not first choice. Could be wrong! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cincinnati Fox said:

What the **** are we doing.

just insane

25 million. For a defensive midfielder. ****ing run by clowns

 

not to say skipp

might be ok but our financial management is ridiculous.

 

25 mil on skipp is just ****ing ridiculous 

 

levy must by laughing his head off. 
 

Rudkin and Susan get out of our club. And top thanks but you have no bollocks. Just sell up 

its only 4 or 5 m this year, so it shouldn`t stop us signing a striker hopefully

 

I don`t get the problem with the fee, as he is young, English and we are buying from one of those clubs so its not a surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, moore_94 said:

Looks like Southampton are paying a reported lower fee for Mateus Fernandes from Sporting who is also 3 years younger than Skipp

 

image.png.d5c57531ac1fa2528e35432154541ffc.png

 

 

Edit: nevermind, misread the heading 

Edited by FoxesWalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

its only 4 or 5 m this year, so it shouldn`t stop us signing a striker hopefully

 

I don`t get the problem with the fee, as he is young, English and we are buying from one of those clubs so its not a surprise.

Not a chance we get more than 25 million for him when we need to move him on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Chocolate Teapot
1 minute ago, StanSP said:

Where are Roma or Hoffenheim when you need them to hijack a deal lol

 

He only wants Leicester.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the transfer fees and basically we've traded Maddison for a starting midfield duo of Skipp and Winks.

 

On paper, Maddison is easily worth more than their combined value.

 

But for where we are as a club, that duo are more use to us than Maddison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Couldn't afford £23m to buy Carvalho despite Liverpool oweing us £5-10m for Nyoni but can pay £20m + add ons for Skipp. Make it make sense Leicester.

Literally nothing this club does makes any sense anymore, pointless trying to work it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Couldn't afford £23m to buy Carvalho despite Liverpool oweing us £5-10m for Nyoni but can pay £20m + add ons for Skipp. Make it make sense Leicester.

Share the frustration Ric but we don’t know that we were interested in Carvalho. You may argue we should have been but that’s another matter. 
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Steve Earle said:

Share the frustration Ric but we don’t know that we were interested in Carvalho. You may argue we should have been but that’s another matter. 
 

It was reported by multiple sources we were interested but it was too expensive to do for us....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Steve Earle said:

Share the frustration Ric but we don’t know that we were interested in Carvalho. You may argue we should have been but that’s another matter. 
 

Would there have been a big wage difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, KingsX said:

Look at the transfer fees and basically we've traded Maddison for a starting midfield duo of Skipp and Winks.

 

On paper, Maddison is easily worth more than their combined value.

 

But for where we are as a club, that duo are more use to us than Maddison.


yes I do get this tbf, Maddison was no use nor ornament when we were scrapping for relegation and was a passenger. Skipp and Winks are an asset when trying to not concede. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Couldn't afford £23m to buy Carvalho despite Liverpool oweing us £5-10m for Nyoni but can pay £20m + add ons for Skipp. Make it make sense Leicester.

Carvalho went for like £35m didn't he?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Couldn't afford £23m to buy Carvalho despite Liverpool oweing us £5-10m for Nyoni but can pay £20m + add ons for Skipp. Make it make sense Leicester.

But that not true is it? Tribunal hasn't happened and we will do well to get a million up front and we my be lucky to get 4m or 5m with lots of add ons.

 

Do you consider Carvalho wasn't interested?

Edited by coolhandfox
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...