Premier League 2024/25

[UniFox21]

5 minutes ago, Lionator said:

I wonder if this was part of the problem with Rodgers? And it could be where a lot of the delusions came from within the squad? Being a good psychological manager is good until it needs freshening up after a couple of years and Brendan proved that he couldn’t do that and/or the board threw him under the bus with regard to new players. 

Yeah definitely, when it's going well it can be a brilliant model 

But as we saw, when it gets stale it can be very tough to fix 

[beastfootballx]

2 POINT DEDUCTIONS!

[foxes_rule1978]

3 minutes ago, beastfootballx said:

2 POINT DEDUCTIONS!

Can they do that, giving we were in the championship? I understand one for our PL campaign but not the championship season

[Wymsey]

Is the damage done in the accounts to warrant such punishment that bad, compared to other clubs?..

[FoyleFox]

33 minutes ago, FOXSE said:

We are not in the relegation zone, and we have a game in hand on most teams below us. We will be fine!

Thanks Madders

[st albans fox]

4 minutes ago, foxes_rule1978 said:

Can they do that, giving we were in the championship? I understand one for our PL campaign but not the championship season

Depends 

[st albans fox]

I see Toney now likely to move somewhere ….

[coolhandfox]

Not a chance the PL deducted points for a championship offence.

 

 

[Corky]

21 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Not a chance the PL deducted points for a championship offence.

 

 

As seen with Sheffield United

[FoyleFox]

23 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Not a chance the PL deducted points for a championship offence.

 

 

They'll find a way for us

[fox_up_north]

I reckon 8 points. They'll want to show other clubs "don't even think about trying to compete"

[CosbehFox]

25 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Not a chance the PL deducted points for a championship offence.

 

 

Forest? Their FFP allowance was reduced due to their 2 years in the Championship and 1 yr in the PL? 

[coolhandfox]

30 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

Forest? Their FFP allowance was reduced due to their 2 years in the Championship and 1 yr in the PL? 

Nope.

 

Their actually PSR offence was committed in the PL season, the championship years are included in the calculation as years -3 and - 2 but they went over the limit in year -1.

 

It that makes sense.

 

 

Edited 18 August by coolhandfox

[FrankieADZ]

dont wonder about Brentford, know its the first game but they look a lil poor

 

Palace on the other hand, they look decent

[beastfootballx]

Eze what a goal!

[FrankieADZ]

1 minute ago, FrankieADZ said:

dont wonder about Brentford, know its the first game but they look a lil poor

 

Palace on the other hand, they look decent

and like that Brentford score,

right whacking 100 quid on a spurs win tomorrow, we might win

[Ian Nacho]

Didnt see a lot wrong with that. 

[whoareyaaa]

palace was all over them 

[KingsX]

Just now, Ian Nacho said:

Didnt see a lot wrong with that. 

 

Must have blown the whistle before the ball was struck?  Bad decision by the referee rather than VAR.

[Leicester_Loyal]

5 minutes ago, KingsX said:

 

Must have blown the whistle before the ball was struck?  Bad decision by the referee rather than VAR.

He blew it after the ball was struck, but before it hit the net I think. Definitely after the ball was struck.

[st albans fox]

1 hour ago, coolhandfox said:

Not a chance the PL deducted points for a championship offence.

It’s a three year rolling total - I think it’s irrelevant that year 3 was in the champ 

48 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

Forest? Their FFP allowance was reduced due to their 2 years in the Championship and 1 yr in the PL? 

Exactly 

19 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Nope.

 

Their actually PSR offence was committed in the PL season, the championship years are included in the calculation as years -3 and - 2 but they went over the limit in year -1.

 

It that makes sense.

 

 

They didn’t break three year rolling psr in the championship - that occurred end of their first year in PL. 

[st albans fox]

2 minutes ago, Leicester_Loyal said:

He blew it after the ball was struck, but before it hit the net I think. Definitely after the ball was struck.

Sort of Irrelevant if the var doesn’t think was a clear error to give the foul against hughes 

 

 

Edited 18 August by st albans fox

[Leicester_Loyal]

5 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

Sort of Irrelevant if the var doesn’t think was a clear error to give the foul against hughes 

 

 

Surely it's relevant as if he hadn't blown the whistle so early, the goal may have been allowed with VAR getting involved?

[Super_horns]

Ref blew too early apparently.

 

The answer to Eze's disallowed goal from the Premier League Match Centre on X.

They said: "The referee awards a free-kick to Brentford a foul by Hughes on Collins. The whistle was blown before the ball entered the goal, so VAR cannot intervene and the referee’s call stands."

[beastfootballx]

5 minutes ago, Super_horns said:

Ref blew too early apparently.

 

The answer to Eze's disallowed goal from the Premier League Match Centre on X.

They said: "The referee awards a free-kick to Brentford a foul by Hughes on Collins. The whistle was blown before the ball entered the goal, so VAR cannot intervene and the referee’s call stands."

Why did the referee blow? Looked a perfectly good goal to me