AjcW Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August 2 minutes ago, moore_94 said: 21 + 6 and 10% was requested. We've sent 23 + 2 and 15% I guess that's getting accepted given it's likely better than what they asked for in both the long and short run 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bluearmyfox28 Posted 27 August Popular Post Share Posted 27 August 3 minutes ago, moore_94 said: So they wanted €21m + €6m euros as well as 10% sell on…. We’ve offered €23m + €2m with 15% sell on…. Rudkin refuses to accept a deal without it being his negotiation! 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silva Fox Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August 1 minute ago, AjcW said: 21 + 6 and 10% was requested. We've sent 23 + 2 and 15% I guess that's getting accepted given it's likely better than what they asked for in both the long and short run Rudkin: The cheque-book that keeps on giving! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Earle Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August 2 minutes ago, moore_94 said: He said this morning that Genk countered with €20m + €6m So why have we offered €23m + €2m + 15% sell on Seems worse no? There’s incompetence and there’s Leicester City incompetence… Or the journalist is talking out of his backside? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moore_94 Posted 27 August Author Share Posted 27 August 2 minutes ago, AjcW said: 21 + 6 and 10% was requested. We've sent 23 + 2 and 15% I guess that's getting accepted given it's likely better than what they asked for in both the long and short run HLN (who I think are the more reliable ones) have said Genk countered with €21m + €6m + 10% sell on Which I think would still be better than what we have offered? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluearmyfox28 Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August 2 minutes ago, moore_94 said: He said this morning that Genk countered with €20m + €6m So why have we offered €23m + €2m + 15% sell on Seems worse no? They wanted 10% sell on as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moore_94 Posted 27 August Author Share Posted 27 August (edited) 1 minute ago, Bluearmyfox28 said: They wanted 10% sell on as well. I don’t think Tavolieri mentioned about a sell on did he? That was HLN Edited 27 August by moore_94 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AjcW Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August 1 minute ago, moore_94 said: HLN (who I think are the more reliable ones) have said Genk countered with €21m + €6m + 10% sell on Which I think would still be better than what we have offered? We've gone back and offered more cash up front and a bigger chunk of a... lets say £70m future deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JimJams Posted 27 August Popular Post Share Posted 27 August You're all just looking at numbers. Forgetting that the addons they've requested might not be the ones we're requesting. Their 6mill addons might be for playing 38 games. Ours might be for winning the balon d'or. It's not necessarily as black n white as you're making out. 7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moore_94 Posted 27 August Author Share Posted 27 August Just now, AjcW said: We've gone back and offered more cash up front and a bigger chunk of a... lets say £70m future deal. Depending on what the sell ons are of course, surely in our situation we would a lower upfront fee? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanSP Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August 7 minutes ago, moore_94 said: He said this morning that Genk countered with €20m + €6m So why have we offered €23m + €2m + 15% sell on Seems worse no? Further incentive for a bigger chunk of money if he sells big in 2-3 yrs time. It's not that bad a counter to be fair. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluearmyfox28 Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August (edited) 9 minutes ago, AjcW said: 21 + 6 and 10% was requested. We've sent 23 + 2 and 15% I guess that's getting accepted given it's likely better than what they asked for in both the long and short run If a future sale of £50m happened, their terms would cost us £32m if add ons and sell on clause is all met. Our terms it would cost us £32.5m, classic Rudkin. Edited 27 August by Bluearmyfox28 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanSP Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August 2 minutes ago, JimJams said: You're all just looking at numbers. Forgetting that the addons they've requested might not be the ones we're requesting. Their 6mill addons might be for playing 38 games. Ours might be for winning the balon d'or. It's not necessarily as black n white as you're making out. Knowing Rudkin it'd be 'winning the Champions League in 24/25 season' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AjcW Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August 2 minutes ago, moore_94 said: Depending on what the sell ons are of course, surely in our situation we would a lower upfront fee? I don't think you're grasping that i'm agreeing with you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moore_94 Posted 27 August Author Share Posted 27 August Just now, AjcW said: I don't think you're grasping that i'm agreeing with you Yeah just noticed, my bad 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AjcW Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August Just now, moore_94 said: Yeah just noticed, my bad Get back to twitter, you might miss something arguing with the mirror 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lambert09 Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August 10 minutes ago, moore_94 said: He said this morning that Genk countered with €20m + €6m So why have we offered €23m + €2m + 15% sell on Seems worse no? and they only wanted 10% sell on…. Rudkinomics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pliskin Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August Obviously not taking any chances after several failed bids elsewhere. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluearmyfox28 Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August 1 minute ago, Pliskin said: Obviously not taking any chances after several failed bids elsewhere. It was their terms? How could they refuse their own conditions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Finnegan Posted 27 August Popular Post Share Posted 27 August Jesus ****ing Christ would you all stop. I love kicking Rudkin as much as anyone else but Tav doesn't literally know the exact amount down to the penny that's being offered back and forth, does he? 14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimJams Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August 1 minute ago, Bluearmyfox28 said: It was their terms? How could they refuse their own conditions? The addon conditions could be very different. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluearmyfox28 Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August I mean it’s the difference of like 500k if he sells for £50m one day… it’s barely anything, just strange to negotiate especially if we are paying more up front. All I can think of is their add on clauses were way to easily achievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st albans fox Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August Clearly no one on twitter actually knows any actual detail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lambert09 Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August 22 minutes ago, moore_94 said: Depending on what the sell ons are of course, surely in our situation we would a lower upfront fee? there’s only so much you can kick a can down the road… maybe we are realising the problem we have next season with the outgoing commitments? If that was a very achievable 5m … appearances for example, then maybe 5m in the books in the championship would not be ideal if we could just pay 3m to guarantee it now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakemoore Posted 27 August Share Posted 27 August 34 minutes ago, AjcW said: 21 + 6 and 10% was requested. We've sent 23 + 2 and 15% I guess that's getting accepted given it's likely better than what they asked for in both the long and short run We don’t know what was asked for. Don’t believe everything you read. There’s SO much bollox on X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Posted by FrankieADZ,
Latest News
Recommended by Finnegan
27 reactions
Go to this post