Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Daggers

What grinds my gears...

By Daggers, in General Chat

Recommended Posts

ScouseFox

ScouseFox

Posted
Posted

I have 3 days off over the festive period. Makes me howl when people moan about only having 2 or 3 weeks off. Fvcking howl.

 

i've got christmas day, the 28th and new years day. and we close at 5.30 on xmas eve and boxing day. lucky us  :xmassmile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Asha

Asha

Posted
Posted

Exactly, the original Wealdstone Raider video was brilliant, loved it the first time I saw it.

 

But no, you can't just leave something to be funny on the odd occasion you come back across it. You have to make shit memes, shit remake videos and ****ing music tracks.

 

The worst thing about the WR is that he genuinely believes his own hype lol

 

Imagine having your own catchphrase and being hassled to repeat it on demand... how ****ing old would that get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vicki Vixen

Vicki Vixen

Posted
Posted

I watch quite a few pirated films/TV, not to mention live football streams but I wouldn't try to defend the practice. Programmes/films cost money to make so it's only fair that the makers want their money back and more.

This is true but the money feeds the big companies, not the young aspiring actors or grassroots football, so there's little to feel sympathetic about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Webbo

Webbo

Posted
Posted

This is true but the money feeds the big companies, not the young aspiring actors or grassroots football, so there's little to feel sympathetic about.

If the big companies didn't provide the money there'd be no films for the actors to act in. Successful actors are hardly hard up anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swarles Barkley

Swarles Barkley

Posted
Posted

Just heard that shrien jewani's house has been vandalised after he got acquitted for the murder of his wife. People on facebook now saying karma, got what he deserved, etc etc.

Personally, i think this is wrong. You cannot continue to harass a guy after he has been legally cleared of any wrongdoing. People who think he did it based on what they hear in the MEDIA(and theyre never lie do they?)and not the whole story as told in court have no right to vandalise his house. I personally thought he did it but doesnt give me the right to abuse him for my own opinion

Just to clarify, people are open to the own opinion but when its actually hurting/affecting people its not acceptable

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stadt

Stadt

Posted
Posted

Just heard that shrien jewani's house has been vandalised after he got acquitted for the murder of his wife. People on facebook now saying karma, got what he deserved, etc etc.

Personally, i think this is wrong. You cannot continue to harass a guy after he has been legally cleared of any wrongdoing. People who think he did it based on what they hear in the MEDIA(and theyre never lie do they?)and not the whole story as told in court have no right to vandalise his house. I personally thought he did it but doesnt give me the right to abuse him for my own opinion

Just to clarify, people are open to the own opinion but when its actually hurting/affecting people its not acceptable

Yeah but you paid your money so you have the right

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Strokes

Strokes

Posted
Posted

Just heard that shrien jewani's house has been vandalised after he got acquitted for the murder of his wife. People on facebook now saying karma, got what he deserved, etc etc.

Personally, i think this is wrong. You cannot continue to harass a guy after he has been legally cleared of any wrongdoing. People who think he did it based on what they hear in the MEDIA(and theyre never lie do they?)and not the whole story as told in court have no right to vandalise his house. I personally thought he did it but doesnt give me the right to abuse him for my own opinion

Just to clarify, people are open to the own opinion but when its actually hurting/affecting people its not acceptable

Normally I'd agree but that cúnt is as guilty as puppy sat next to a pile of poo.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest MattP

Guest MattP

Posted
Posted

A group of 12 people after heading evidence and testimony didn't think so. That should have been an end to it.

Vigilantism is hardly ever justified, especially petty shit like this.

What twelve people were they then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
leicsmac

leicsmac

Posted
Posted

What twelve people were they then?

 

I've had an absolute bloody 'mare there. Thought for a moment it was a British jury case due to the misspelling of the name, not the Saffer case.  :xmasunsure:

 

I blame the hangover. :ph34r:

 

Either way I'm not a massive fan of vigilantism, even when the due process can be seen as weak. I've no doubt the people 'convicting' him for this have far less knowledge of the facts than the judge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest MattP

Guest MattP

Posted
Posted

No I do agree with that.

Although it's an absolute abomination this man hasn't had to stand in a court of law and defend the accusations against him.

If justice isn't seen to be done you'll get things likethis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...