Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Daggers

Absolute *** of our time Pt.MXXVI

By Daggers, in General Chat

Recommended Posts

Parafox

Parafox

Posted
Posted
On 18/12/2022 at 13:33, Wymsey said:

You need to remember that Jeremy Clarkson gets a bit bitter about a lot of things, in particular when things don't go his way.

 

For example, ask the locals where he has had planning issues at his farm what they think of him..

When he lived on the Isle of Man he was universally hated for his arrogance and belligerence. 

 

Protesting and trying legal action because a PUBLIC footpath and right of way passed near his home. Apparently he didn't like people looking onto his land.

 

My bro who lives there said Clarkson would bomb around in his flash car intimidating others.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Facecloth

Facecloth

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Nalis said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-64086021

 

Rob Burrow's wheelchair accessible van vandalised in Castleford

 

 

 

 

 

Absolute wan kers, what goes through these people's heads....

 

 

Bit of a stretch to label them anything. The extended story states it a deep scratch on the back door, but his dad's tweet tries to insist they were targeted. Could simply be an accident. Still not great actions if it was an accident and the person has left the scene, but to suggest they are ***** and Burrows was targeted is pushing it a bit. Now because of who he is he's inundated with offers to fix it for free, whereas hundred of people, even disabled ones don't get those offers. Cars still drivable, when I first saw the headline I thought the tyres had been slashed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aus Fox

Aus Fox

Posted
Posted
On 24/12/2022 at 05:26, bovril said:

Slightly off topic but I do find it weird that extremely innocuous political chat gets deleted but arguably more controversial stuff stays. Has any explanation ever been given for that other than the mods being touchy right wingers?

Any ideas if any of those touchy right wingers can cut inside onto their left? Asking for a friend

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Lionator

Lionator

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
21 minutes ago, Soup said:

It remains to be seen if there is anything in this. However there's more and more doctors and others in the scientific community that are raising concerns now. 

Yea that famous scientist Matt Le Tissier. If you read the article, Bridgen has been claiming these things without any evidence to support it, just like the grifting scientists who are jumping on the bandwagon. 

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
leicsmac

leicsmac

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
1 hour ago, Lionator said:

Yea that famous scientist Matt Le Tissier. If you read the article, Bridgen has been claiming these things without any evidence to support it, just like the grifting scientists who are jumping on the bandwagon. 

... and such claims would normally be harmless, except in this case and a couple of others they are causing tangible, quantifiable harm.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Soup

Soup

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Lionator said:

Yea that famous scientist Matt Le Tissier. If you read the article, Bridgen has been claiming these things without any evidence to support it, just like the grifting scientists who are jumping on the bandwagon. 

So you're not interested in even looking at any potential risks with mNRA? Seems odd that you'd give free passes to some of the most corrupt companies on the planet. Tbh I'm not that fussed anymore, negative thinking takes up too much time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LiberalFox

LiberalFox

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, leicsmac said:

I'm not going to bring more politics into this, so all I'll say is that the survival of human civilisation really isn't a political issue anyway.

It's a bit of a shame we can't have a moderation policy like banning people for being abusive or consistently derailing topics rather than bans for what a self identified 'I don't do politics' person considers too political when they're after a bit of a power trip. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dunge

Dunge

Posted
Posted
On 28/12/2022 at 12:07, Soup said:

So you're not interested in even looking at any potential risks with mNRA? Seems odd that you'd give free passes to some of the most corrupt companies on the planet. Tbh I'm not that fussed anymore, negative thinking takes up too much time. 

I feel like this has been discussed thousands upon thousands of times, but it comes down to this: Any heart risk (short term or long term) from having a vaccination is less than the heart risk from getting Covid unvaccinated - which is as good as inevitable given that deniers would not be careful about Covid by your very nature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Soup

Soup

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Dunge said:

I feel like this has been discussed thousands upon thousands of times, but it comes down to this: Any heart risk (short term or long term) from having a vaccination is less than the heart risk from getting Covid unvaccinated - which is as good as inevitable given that deniers would not be careful about Covid by your very nature.

Ok cool I'm ok with that view. It's not mine, but hey-ho 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
Dunge

Dunge

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
3 minutes ago, Soup said:

Ok cool I'm ok with that view. It's not mine, but hey-ho 

What’s frustrating about this statement is that it’s my view in the same way that it’s also my view that an isosceles triangle is a type of triangle. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
taupe

taupe

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Dunge said:

as good as inevitable given that deniers would not be careful about Covid by your very nature.

That to me reads rather sweeping, presumptuous and a tad patronising. Hopefully I've read it wrongly. Suffice to say, I don't assume all those that chose to not have the vaccinations were 'deniers' nor lax in other precautions. 

 

But you do at least acknowledge some risk from the vaccine. To me, it's obvious. There are side effects with all medications, some more severe than others. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paninistickers

Paninistickers

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Dunge said:

I feel like this has been discussed thousands upon thousands of times, but it comes down to this: Any heart risk (short term or long term) from having a vaccination is less than the heart risk from getting Covid unvaccinated - which is as good as inevitable given that deniers would not be careful about Covid by your very nature.

Not true. Anyone healthy and/or relatively young had a close to zero chance of dying of Covid. The whole hoo-ha, as you well know, was coercing healthy, zero risk people to take 'vaccines' (a vaccine, I may add, that u like measles or smallpox or TB, didn't actually prevent you from getting the illness) for the greater good of society. Not for individual safety. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dunge

Dunge

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, taupe said:

That to me reads rather sweeping, presumptuous and a tad patronising. Hopefully I've read it wrongly. Suffice to say, I don't assume all those that chose to not have the vaccinations were 'deniers' nor lax in other precautions. 

 

But you do at least acknowledge some risk from the vaccine. To me, it's obvious. There are side effects with all medications, some more severe than others. 

It is patronising, you’re reading it right. I find it very difficult not to be patronising toward people who choose to ignore the science on this in favour of plopping themselves and then knuckling down because of some pseudo nonsense from a Facebook feed. Literally so much has been discussed on this, openly, freely and reasonably. It’s almost at levels of flat Earthery to me now.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Soup

Soup

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Dunge said:

What’s frustrating about this statement is that it’s my view in the same way that it’s also my view that an isosceles triangle is a type of triangle. 

Don't be frustrated man, people are different and will always look at things differently. I don't happen to trust these companies pushing these drugs, that's all. If you do then fine. Take it easy and good night 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...