foxes_rule1978 Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 Garth Crooks is a nob, we only won cus Shawcross went off, numpty he is an epic idiot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark 'expert' Lawrenson Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 Garth Crooks is a nob, we only won cus Shawcross went off, numpty He will never give us credit, he's a twat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 Garth Crooks is a nob, we only won cus Shawcross went off, numpty He was saying that was the turning point was he not? and to be fair, it was, we got a lot more joy once shawcross had gone off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighPeakFox Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 You beat me to it, churlish and bitter in extreme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr The Singh Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 He was saying that was the turning point was he not? and to be fair, it was, we got a lot more joy once shawcross had gone off.We had 2 excellant chances before he went off, the first 2 goals, I doubt Shawcross could do much. Danny's chance may still may of happened and Vardy would rip Shawcross for pace. Either way, unless you have mystical powers, its very hard to determine fate of a match with the participation of a player. For a so called panel expert, that stank, he made that statement a feature of the result. Not the fact that we were already dominant, and Stoke were shit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 We had 2 excellant chances before he went off, the first 2 goals, I doubt Shawcross could do much. Danny's chance may still may of happened and Vardy would rip Shawcross for pace. Either way, unless you have mystical powers, its very hard to determine fate of a match with the participation of a player. For a so called panel expert, that stank, he made that statement a feature of the result. Not the fact that we were already dominant, and Stoke were shit We were already dominant, but the one who replaced him (name bypasses me, the one whose hair looked like he was wearing one of those jewish caps) was significantly worse than Shawcross, which gave us a big advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr The Singh Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 We were already dominant, but the one who replaced him (name bypasses me, the one whose hair looked like he was wearing one of those jewish caps) was significantly worse than Shawcross, which gave us a big advantage.Name me one major mistake Wilson made??? we brought Leo on for Shitji, so if we had drawn the game, would a anyone go around saying, we didn't win because if it...NO, cus theres another 10 players in the team that contribute. People get injured, shit happens...it still takes skl and talent for city to win, we didnt win because the game was gifted to us by Wilson, we won it, cus we attacked and dominated. For Garth to bring that injury as the main vocal point, and statement, that stank. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HesNotGudjonsonn2 Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 I just read what others say and enjoy the pointless anger. The Stoke fans were even angry at the lighters in the 72 minute. What were they for by the way? Anyway, if you listen to what everyone we beat says then we are going to be the first team ever to win the premier League on pure luck. Lucky us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finnegan Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 Even if we won the league there'd be countless people that will say it's just been a poor season or a weak season and that we're a flash in the pan. I don't really care tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Webbo Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 Didn't Shawcross go off after 20 odd minutes? Ridiculous to say we wouldn't have scored because we hadn't before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 Name me one major mistake Wilson made??? we brought Leo on for Shitji, so if we had drawn the game, would a anyone go around saying, we didn't win because if it...NO, cus theres another 10 players in the team that contribute. People get injured, shit happens...it still takes skl and talent for city to win, we didnt win because the game was gifted to us by Wilson, we won it, cus we attacked and dominated. For Garth to bring that injury as the main vocal point, and statement, that stank. Not so much major mistakes as looking less assured than Shawcross and less comfortable with the ball. No-ones saying that wilson gifted us the game, they're saying that the injury to shawcross was of help to us, which is perfectly fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozwin Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 Think it's a bit insulting to Stoke to say losing one player caused them to lose the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finnaldo Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 Think it's a bit insulting to Stoke to say losing one player caused them to lose the game. Especially when it was a CB with Shaqiri and Bojan at their disposal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr The Singh Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 Not so much major mistakes as looking less assured than Shawcross and less comfortable with the ball. No-ones saying that wilson gifted us the game, they're saying that the injury to shawcross was of help to us, which is perfectly fair.No that's not what Garth said, his statement was clear,he first mildly complimented us, then '..,..however I could not see Leicester scoring until Shawcross went off injured. Leicester then took full advantage....'. That statement is not Leicester played well the injury helped, more so the manner in which said it, it was a tone of great importance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rico Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 http://oatcakefanzine.proboards.com/thread/253166/make-leicester Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajthefox Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 Couple horrible posts in there (as with anywhere) but on the whole very complementary and seem to know their stuff about us. fair play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suffolk fox Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 I just read what others say and enjoy the pointless anger. The Stoke fans were even angry at the lighters in the 72 minute. What were they for by the way? Anyway, if you listen to what everyone we beat says then we are going to be the first team ever to win the premier League on pure luck. Lucky us! Must admit though I too thought the mobile lights were shit don't Watford do that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CityFan 06 Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 Some nice comments in there. Seem to be very knowledgeable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fez of Mahrez Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 On Talksport (feel free to stop reading here), when the Man City game finished, Sam Matterface (or here) said: "Advantage Arsenal in the title race" Imagine that in any other season if the third-placed team drew and the second-placed team were three points off top with a game in hand. Say if it was Arsenal third, Chelsea second and Manchester City top, for example. You'd throw him straight in an asylum. Is the title given to the team finishing second this year? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 On Talksport (feel free to stop reading here), when the Man City game finished, Sam Matterface (or here) said: "Advantage Arsenal in the title race" Imagine that in any other season if the third-placed team drew and the second-placed team were three points off top with a game in hand. Say if it was Arsenal third, Chelsea second and Manchester City top, for example. You'd throw him straight in an asylum. Is the title given to the team finishing second this year? If we finish top, then yes. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxes_rule1978 Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 (edited) On Talksport (feel free to stop reading here), when the Man City game finished, Sam Matterface (or here) said: "Advantage Arsenal in the title race" Imagine that in any other season if the third-placed team drew and the second-placed team were three points off top with a game in hand. Say if it was Arsenal third, Chelsea second and Manchester City top, for example. You'd throw him straight in an asylum. Is the title given to the team finishing second this year? We are contenders... added some good signings and a striker away from being a truly top side.. We are Leivester but I tell you what we are serious about winning the title now Edited 23 January 2016 by foxes_rule1978 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr The Singh Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 On Talksport (feel free to stop reading here), when the Man City game finished, Sam Matterface (or here) said: "Advantage Arsenal in the title race" Imagine that in any other season if the third-placed team drew and the second-placed team were three points off top with a game in hand. Say if it was Arsenal third, Chelsea second and Manchester City top, for example. You'd throw him straight in an asylum. Is the title given to the team finishing second this year? There proper cooonts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Littletoe Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 Some decent Stoke fans on that forum topic which is a massive change. Atleast they are admitting the truth.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 On Talksport (feel free to stop reading here), when the Man City game finished, Sam Matterface (or here) said: "Advantage Arsenal in the title race" Imagine that in any other season if the third-placed team drew and the second-placed team were three points off top with a game in hand. Say if it was Arsenal third, Chelsea second and Manchester City top, for example. You'd throw him straight in an asylum. Is the title given to the team finishing second this year? In fairness with them having a game in hand on us and us having to go there I'd still have them for first, although talking about it as a two horse race is ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
queensguardfox Posted 23 January 2016 Share Posted 23 January 2016 nice to see 90% of Liverpool fans belive we will make top 4...... ours to lose http://forums.liverpoolfc.com/threads/381536-Who-Is-Going-To-Get-In-The-Top-Four-(Opinions) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts