KentyLCFC Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 ****ING HELL. CHELSEA ****ING RENT BOYS. SHAGGING VITESSE UP THE TWATING ARSEHOLE AGAIN. RUSSIAN SYNDICATE BASTARDS. Yes i am mad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Flair Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 Funny really... good source in the summer says we have about £10m to spend and we spend about £10m. Good source says we have around £6m to spend in January and everyone acts like he's an idiot who doesn't know what he's talking about. Some random agent says "what if" we spend £40m and it's gospel. We may only spend £6 million but the fact we bid £8 million for this Croat suggests a bit more and we aren't going to only sign 1 player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilo Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 He'll never be seen again if he goes to play for that lot. Poor, poor decision. This must be why his agent said we were the better choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpjfox Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 confusing and conflicting reports, certainly seems a quality striker and would be a elcome addition either permanent or loan. Choosing Chelsea over us is a "no brainer" until you consider game time and previous Chelsea signings that they seem to send away and never return. If we can agree a permanent contract with wage reduction clause etc he could be an awesome signing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ttfn Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 He'll never be seen again if he goes to play for that lot. Poor, poor decision. This must be why his agent said we were the better choice. It wasn't his agent was it? I read it as "an agent" which is why I couldn't understand why people were getting excited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmeh Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 He'll never be seen again if he goes to play for that lot. Poor, poor decision. This must be why his agent said we were the better choice. That's a ridiculous statement. So lukaku was never seen again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ttfn Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 That's a ridiculous statement. So lukaku was never seen again? Lukaku was loaned to 2 other Premier League clubs and never really broke into the Chelsea side. I am struggling to understand what the benefit to Chelsea is of sending him to a different country and a different culture to the UK when by all accounts there is a club 100 miles up the road desperate to take the player for 6 months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilo Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 That's a ridiculous statement. So lukaku was never seen again? What ttfn said. Calm down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmeh Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 Lukaku was loaned to 2 other Premier League clubs and never really broke into the Chelsea side. I am struggling to understand what the benefit to Chelsea is of sending him to a different country and a different culture to the UK when by all accounts there is a club 100 miles up the road desperate to take the player for 6 months. Because chelsea have an agreement with vitesse to loan them a certain amount of players. They probably guarantee him to start every game aswell which we obviously wouldn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilo Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 Think we can close this one soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmeh Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 He would be shite anyway. The league he has been playing in is worse than the championship Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmeh Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 And his current clubs stadium capacity is 10,000. Says it all. Look how amazing jelavic was at rangers but shite in England. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanSP Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 And his current clubs stadium capacity is 10,000. Says it all. Look how amazing jelavic was at rangers but shite in England. So what lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmeh Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 So what lol Well he plays for a small club in an awful league. It just proves the level hes been playing at Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theessexfox Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 Hate Vitesse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warbo666 Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 Apparently Manchester City and Chelsea interested in signing Wilfried Bony.... (http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/30639686) ... If we were to get Kramaric, then WB to Chelsea could potentially pave the way for it.... Also, El Shaarawy for a reported £11.5mil?! If we want to splash the cash, an Italy international, still only 22, Left wing/forward wouldn't be a bad shout!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanSP Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 Apparently Manchester City and Chelsea interested in signing Wilfried Bony.... (http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/30639686) ... If we were to get Kramaric, then WB to Chelsea could potentially pave the way for it.... Also, El Shaarawy for a reported £11.5mil?! If we want to splash the cash, an Italy international, still only 22, Left wing/forward wouldn't be a bad shout!! We're not getting Kramaric. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmeh Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 Abramovich is good pals with vitesse' owner apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KFS Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 Who the fvck are Vitesse? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KFS Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 Just seen that they've got Josh Mceachran on loan. Says it all, the lads had more clubs than hot dinners. This is bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MHC Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 The reason Chelsea will sign this player instead of us is not because they are a bigger club but because we are tight fisted c#nts when it comes to wages. We are in no position to negotiate the lowest wage possible, we should have just offered him five times as much as he asked for and a 25% wage rise if we stay up with a relegation release clause of the amount we bought him for in case we go down, that way we wouldn't make a loss on him. Guarantee we would sign him instead of Chelsea then. Being tight with wages and transfer bids is going to get us relegated! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilo Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 Who the fvck are Vitesse? Mid table Dutch outfit sandwiched between Utrecht and Heerenveen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanSP Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 The reason Chelsea will sign this player instead of us is not because they are a bigger club but because we are tight fisted c#nts when it comes to wages. We are in no position to negotiate the lowest wage possible, we should have just offered him five times as much as he asked for and a 25% wage rise if we stay up with a relegation release clause of the amount we bought him for in case we go down, that way we wouldn't make a loss on him. Guarantee we would sign him instead of Chelsea then. Being tight with wages and transfer bids is going to get us relegated! I wonder what computer game you play lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmeh Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 The reason Chelsea will sign this player instead of us is not because they are a bigger club but because we are tight fisted c#nts when it comes to wages. We are in no position to negotiate the lowest wage possible, we should have just offered him five times as much as he asked for and a 25% wage rise if we stay up with a relegation release clause of the amount we bought him for in case we go down, that way we wouldn't make a loss on him. Guarantee we would sign him instead of Chelsea then. Being tight with wages and transfer bids is going to get us relegated! Yeah okay. Why don't you think for a second what you would do if you were him and not a Leicester supporter. Join the team that is first in the premiership with the best manager in the world. Live in london and train with the likes of cesc fabregas, Diego costa and eden hazard. Or join the team who is bottom of the league, live in Leicester and play with super davey nugent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kopfkino Posted 31 December 2014 Share Posted 31 December 2014 Thought Steve Walsh's Chelsea connections would get us the loan here. If Chelsea sign Bony then that's already a nail in Kramaric's coffin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.